Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 1
14 January 2016
Shire of Esperance
Ordinary Council
An Agenda Briefing Session of the Shire of Esperance will be held at Council Chambers on 19 January 2015 commencing at 1pm to brief Council on the matters set out in the attached agenda.
An Ordinary Council meeting of the Shire of Esperance will be held at Council Chambers on 27 January 2016 commencing at 4pm to consider the matters set out in the attached agenda.
W M (Matthew) Scott
Chief Executive Officer
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 2
DISCLAIMER
No responsibility whatsoever is implied or accepted by the Shire of Esperance for any act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council or Committee meetings. The Shire of Esperance disclaims any liability for any loss whatsoever and howsoever caused arising out of reliance by any person or legal entity on any such act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council or Committee meetings. Any person or legal entity who acts or fails to act in reliance upon any statement, act or omission made in a Council or Committee meeting does so at that person’s or legal entity’s own risk.
In particular and without derogating in any way from the broad disclaimer above, in any discussion regarding any planning application or application for a licence, any statement or intimation of approval made by a member or officer of the Shire of Esperance during the course of any meeting is not intended to be and is not to be taken as notice of approval from the Shire of Esperance. The Shire of Esperance warns that anyone who has any application lodged with the Shire of Esperance must obtain and should only rely on written confirmation of the outcome of the application, and any conditions attaching to the decision made by the Shire of Esperance in respect of the application.
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Council is committed to a code of conduct and all decisions are based on an honest assessment of the issue, ethical decision-making and personal integrity. Councillors and staff adhere to the statutory requirements to declare financial, proximity and impartiality interests and once declared follow the legislation as required.
ATTACHMENTS
Please be advised that in order to save printing and paper costs, all attachments referenced in this paper are available in the original Agenda document for this meeting.
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 3
Agenda Briefing ¨ Ordinary Council Meeting ¨ Both Meetings ¨
Name of Person Declaring the Interest:
Position:
Date
of Meeting:
This form is provided to enable members and officers to disclose an Interest in the matter in accordance with the regulations of Section 5.65, 5.70 and 5.71 of the Local Government Act and Local Government (Administration) Regulation 34C.
Interest Disclosed
Nature of Interest:
Type of Interest: Financial Proximity Impartiality
|
|||
Interest Disclosed
Nature of Interest:
Type of Interest: Financial Proximity Impartiality
|
|||
Interest Disclosed
Nature of Interest:
Type of Interest: Financial Proximity Impartiality
|
Signature: Date:
Office Use Only:
Officer Date |
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 4
A member who has a Financial Interest in any matter to be discussed at a Council or Committee Meeting, which will be attended by the member, must disclose the nature of the interest:
a) In a written notice given to the Chief Executive Officers before the Meeting or;
b) At the Meeting, immediately before the matter is discussed.
A member, who makes a disclosure in respect to an interest, must not:
c) Preside at the part of the Meeting, relation to the matter or;
d) Participate in, or be present during any discussion or decision-making procedure relative to the matter, unless to the extent that the disclosing member is allowed to do so under Section 5.68 or Section 5.69 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Notes on Financial Interest (For your Guidance)
The following notes are a basic guide for Councillors when they are considering whether they have a Financial Interest in a matter.
1. A Financial Interest requiring disclosure occurs when a Council decision might advantageously or detrimentally affect the Councillor or a person closely associated with the Councillor and is capable of being measured in money terms. There are expectations in the Local Government Act 1995 but they should not be relied on without advice, unless the situation is very clear.
2. If a Councillor is a member of an Association (which is a Body Corporate) with not less than 10 members i.e sporting, social, religious ect, and the Councillor is not a holder of office of profit or a guarantor, and has not leased land to or from the club, i.e, if the Councillor is an ordinary member of the Association, the Councillor has a common and not a financial interest in any matter to that Association.
3. If an interest is shared in common with a significant number of electors and ratepayers, then the obligation to disclose that interest does not arise. Each case need to be considered.
4. If in doubt declare.
5. As stated in (b) above, if written notice disclosing the interest has not been given to the Chief Executive Officer before the meeting, then it must be given when the matter arises in the Agenda, and immediately before the matter is discussed.
6. Ordinarily the disclosing Councillor must leave the meeting room before discussion commences. The only exceptions are:
6.1 Where the Councillor discloses the extent of the interest, and Council carries a motion under s.5.68(1)(b)(ii) of the Local Government Act; or
6.2 Where the Minister allows the Councillor to participate under s.5.69(3) of the Local Government Act, with or without conditions.
Interests Affecting Proximity
1) For the purposes of this subdivision, a person has a proximity interest in a matter if the matter concerns;
a) a proposed change to a planning scheme affecting land that adjoins the person’s land;
b) a proposed change to the zoning or use of land that adjoins the person’s land; or
c) a proposed development (as defined in section 5.63(5)) of land that adjoins the person’s land.
2) In this section, land (the proposal land) adjoins a person’s land if;
a) The proposal land, not being a thoroughfare, has a common boundary with the person’s land;
b) The proposal land, or any part of it, is directly across a thoroughfare from, the person’s land; or
c) The proposal land is that part of a thoroughfare that has a common boundary with the person’s land.
3) In this section a reference to a person’s land is a reference to any land owned by the person or in which the person has any estate or interest.
Interests Affecting Impartiality
Definition: An interest that would give rise to a reasonable belief that the impartiality of the person having the interest would be adversely affected, but does not include an interest as referred to in Section 5.60 of the ‘Act’.
A member who has an Interest Affecting Impartiality in any matter to be discussed at a Council or Committee Meeting, which will be attended by the member, must disclose the nature of the interest;
a) In a written notice given to the Chief Executive Officers before the Meeting or;
b) At the Meeting, immediately before the matter is discussed.
Impact of an Impartiality Closure
There are very different outcomes resulting from disclosing an interest affecting impartiality compared to that of a financial interest. With the declaration of a financial interest, an elected member leaves the room and does not vote.
With the declaration of this new type of interest, the elected member stays in the room, participates in the debate and votes. In effect then, following disclosure of an interest affecting impartiality, the member’s involvement in the Meeting continues as if no interest existed.
THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. APOLOGIES & NOTIFICATION OF GRANTED LEAVE OF ABSENCE
4. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PERSON PRESIDING WITHOUT DISCUSSION
6. DECLARATION OF MEMBERS INTERESTS
6.1 Declarations of Financial Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60a
6.2 Declarations of Proximity Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60b
6.3 Declarations of Impartiality Interests – Admin Regulations Section 34c
8. PUBLIC ADDRESSES / DEPUTATIONS
11. DELEGATES’ REPORTS WITHOUT DISCUSSION
12. MATTERS REQUIRING A DETERMINATION OF COUNCIL
12.1 External Services - Statutory Division
12.1.1 Local Planning Scheme No. 23 - Amendment No. 20
12.1.2 Adoption of Revised Local Planning Policy - Outbuildings
12.1.4 Proposed Road Closure - Portion of Road Reserve adjoining Lot 606 Doak Place, Castletown
12.1.5 Proposed Road Closure - Landfill Road, Bandy Creek
12.2 External Services - Commercial Division
12.3 External Service - Community Division
12.4.1 2015 Asset Management Strategy
12.4.2 General Asset Management Plan
12.4.3 Asset Management Plan - Stormwater Drainage 2015
12.5.1 Debt Write-Off - Debtor # 3883
12.5.2 Financial Services Report - December 2015
12.6.1 Information Bulletin - January 2016
13.1 Minutes of the Audit Committee
14. Motions of which Notice has been Given
15. MEMBERS QUESTIONS WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE
16. URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY DECISION
17. MATTERS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS
17.1 Tender 09-15 Construction of Depot Administration Building
17.2 RFQ 13-15 Replacement of a Grader
17.3 RFQ 17-15 Replacement of a Prime Mover
17.4 RFQ 18-15 Replacement of an End Tipper
17.5 RFQ 20-15 Replacement of a Light Truck
17.6 RFQ 29-15 Replacement of a Low Loader
17.7 Sale of Vacant Land - 6 Adelaide Close
17.8 Proposed Lease - Lot 47 Shark Lake Road Monjingup - Shark Lake Industrial Park
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 9
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
AGENDA
Ordinary
Council Meeting
TO BE HELD IN Council Chambers ON 27 January 2016
COMMENCING AT 4pm
1. OFFICIAL OPENING
2. ATTENDANCE
Members
Cr V Brown President Rural Ward
Cr N Bowman Deputy President Rural Ward
Cr J Parsons Town Ward
Cr P Griffiths Town Ward
Cr K Hall Town Ward
Cr L McIntyre Town Ward
Cr R Padgurskis Town Ward
Cr B Stewart, JP Town Ward
Cr B Parker Rural Ward
Shire Officers
Mr W M (Matthew) Scott Chief Executive Officer
Mr S Burge Director Corporate Resources
Mr G Harris Director Asset Management
Mr T Sargent Director External Services
Mrs H Hall Executive Assistant
Miss S Fitzgerald Administration Officer
Members of the Public & Press
3. APOLOGIES & NOTIFICATION OF GRANTED LEAVE OF ABSENCE
4. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PERSON PRESIDING WITHOUT DISCUSSION
6. DECLARATION OF MEMBERS INTERESTS
6.1 Declarations of Financial Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60a
6.2 Declarations of Proximity Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60b
6.3 Declarations of Impartiality Interests – Admin Regulations Section 34c
7. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
8. PUBLIC ADDRESSES / DEPUTATIONS
9. Petitions
10. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
11. DELEGATES’ REPORTS WITHOUT DISCUSSION
12. MATTERS REQUIRING A DETERMINATION OF COUNCIL
12.1 External Services - Statutory Division
Local Planning Scheme No. 23 - Amendment No. 20
Author/s |
Richard Hindley |
Executive Manager - Statutory Division |
Authorisor/s |
Terry Sargent |
Director External Services |
File Ref: D15/31341
Applicant
Internal
Location/Address
Various
Executive Summary
For Council to consider initiating Amendment No. 20 to Local Planning Scheme No. 23 to introduce controls for second-hand dwellings into the Scheme by incorporating new clauses.
Recommendation in Brief
That Council initiate Amendment No. 20 to Local Planning Scheme No. 23.
Background
Notice of Final Approval of the Shire of Esperance Local Planning Scheme No. 23 (‘the Scheme’) was published in the Government Gazette on 19 February 2010.
The introduction of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 changed the exemptions that apply to development. One of these changes was to exempt second-hand (or relocated) dwellings from planning approval as they fall under the definition of a dwelling.
The Department of Planning has advised that this approach has now been amended and that Scheme controls can be put in place to control this form of development.
Officer’s Comment
This amendment allows development control for second-hand dwellings to be reintroduced into the Scheme. This control was previously provided through a local planning policy.
With the introduction of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 a second-hand dwelling was considered to be a form of dwelling and thus exempt from development approval when all applicable R-Code standards have been met.
This resulted in a response from a number of local governments as well as planners in the private sector objecting to the exemption of this form of development. Lobbying of the Department of Planning based on the potential amenity issues related to this form of development has resulted in the Department foreshadowing the introduction of the capacity to regulate this land use.
To give development control a scheme amendment is required to insert the land use definition of ‘second-hand dwelling’ and to determine the permissibility of the use through the zoning table.
A full copy of the amendment documentation is attached (See Attachment A).
Consultation
A 42 day advertising period applies for amendment which will commence upon receipt of comments from the EPA.
Financial Implications
Nil
Statutory Implications
Planning and Development Act 2005
Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015
Local Planning Scheme No. 23
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Facilitate and guide high quality and efficient building and development across the Shire
A community with high quality and efficient buildings and development
a. |
Local Planning Scheme No. 23 - Amendment No. 20 |
|
That Council, pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005: 1. Initiate Local Planning Scheme No. 23 – Amendment No. 20 2. Amend Local Planning Scheme No. 23 by: I. Inserting ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ as a use into Table No. 1 – Zoning and Land Use Table as a ‘D’ use within the Residential, Country Town, Rural Residential, Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture General zones, and as an ‘X’ use within all other zones. II. Amending the Scheme by inserting the following clause into Part 5: 5.24 Second-hand Dwelling Requirements 5.24.1 Notwithstanding any other requirement of the Scheme, all Second-hand dwellings require the planning approval of the local government. 5.24.2 Where a Second-hand dwelling use is proposed it shall comply with the following: a) A building that has a roof or wall sheeting or any other material such as sound proofing or insulation, that contains asbestos, is not permitted to be relocated until those materials containing asbestos are removed and disposed of in the appropriate manner, prior to transportation. b) All asbestos roofs are to be removed prior to relocation irrespective of condition. c) Within the residential zone, if 50% or more of the existing dwellings within ten (10) lots on either side and on both sides of the road of a subject site have external walls of brick, then the dwelling to be located on the site is to be substantially brick veneered. If a corner site is involved, the calculation will be based on the longer street. If an upgrading of external building materials is necessary, the proposed treatment must be fully detailed on the application. d) If a brick veneer condition is not imposed, then the void area between the floor and natural ground levels is to be enclosed with brickwork, battens or other suitable materials. e) Regardless of external wall materials, all roofs over the main portion of the dwelling are to have a pitch of 10º or greater. 5.24.3 When considering an application for planning approval for a second-hand dwelling, the local government may impose conditions concerning: a) The external appearance and material finishes, the screening of sub-floor spaces, the addition to or modification to the existing dwelling and the time frame imposed to complete specified work and connect the dwelling or building to lot services; b) The provision of landscaping and/or screening of the building and/or site; and c) The provision of a bond or bank guarantee in favour of the Local Government as surety for the completion of the building to a standard of presentation acceptable to the Local Government within a specified time. 5.24.4 Where the provision of a bond or bank guarantee is required, the Local Government shall refund the payment upon satisfactory completion of the necessary works. III. Inserting the definition of ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ into Schedule 1 as: means a dwelling that has been in a different location, and has been dismantled and transported to another location, but does not include a new modular or transportable dwelling; 3. Under Regulation 35(2)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 determine that Amendment No. 20 is a standard amendment as under Regulation 34 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 it is not a complex or basic amendment. 4. Refer Amendment No. 20 to the EPA under Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 14
![]() |
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO. 23
AMENDMENT NO. 20
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005
RESOLUTION DECIDING TO AMEND A LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO. 23
AMENDMENT NO. 20
Resolved that the local government, in pursuance of Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act, 2005 amend the above local planning scheme by;
1. Inserting ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ as a use into Table No. 1 – Zoning and Land Use Table as a ‘D’ use within the Residential, Country Town, Rural Residential, Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture General zones, and as an ‘X’ use within all other zones.
2. Amending the Scheme by inserting the following clause into Part 5:
5.24 Second-hand Dwelling Requirements
5.24.1 Notwithstanding any other requirement of the Scheme, all Second-hand dwellings require the planning approval of the local government.
5.24.2 Where a Second-hand dwelling use is proposed it shall comply with the following:
a) A building that has a roof or wall sheeting or any other material such as sound proofing or insulation, that contains asbestos, is not permitted to be relocated until those materials containing asbestos are removed and disposed of in the appropriate manner, prior to transportation.
b) All asbestos roofs are to be removed prior to relocation irrespective of condition.
c) Within the residential zone, if 50% or more of the existing dwellings within ten (10) lots on either side and on both sides of the road of a subject site have external walls of brick, then the dwelling to be located on the site is to be substantially brick veneered. If a corner site is involved, the calculation will be based on the longer street. If an upgrading of external building materials is necessary, the proposed treatment must be fully detailed on the application.
d) If a brick veneer condition is not imposed, then the void area between the floor and natural ground levels is to be enclosed with brickwork, battens or other suitable materials.
e) Regardless of external wall materials, all roofs over the main portion of the dwelling are to have a pitch of 10º or greater.
5.24.3 When considering an application for planning approval for a second-hand dwelling, the local government may impose conditions concerning:
a) The external appearance and material finishes, the screening of sub-floor spaces, the addition to or modification to the existing dwelling and the time frame imposed to complete specified work and connect the dwelling or building to lot services;
b) The provision of landscaping and/or screening of the building and/or site; and
c) The provision of a bond or bank guarantee in favour of the Local Government as surety for the completion of the building to a standard of presentation acceptable to the Local Government within a specified time.
5.24.4 Where the provision of a bond or bank guarantee is required, the Local Government shall refund the payment upon satisfactory completion of the necessary works.
3. Inserting the definition of ‘‘Second-hand Dwelling’ into Schedule 1 as: means a dwelling that has been in a different location, and has been dismantled and transported to another location, but does not include a new modular or transportable dwelling;
Dated this…………….day of………………2016
………………………….………..
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 17
PROPOSAL TO AMEND A LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME
LOCAL GOVERNMENT |
|
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE |
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME |
|
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO. 23 |
|
|
|
TYPE OF SCHEME |
|
DISTRICT SCHEME |
|
|
|
SERIAL NO. OF AMENDMENT |
|
20 |
|
|
|
PROPOSAL |
|
1. Inserting ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ as a use into Table No. 1 – Zoning and Land Use Table as a ‘D’ use within the Residential, Country Town, Rural Residential, Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture General zones, and as an ‘X’ use within all other zones. 2. Amending the Scheme by inserting the following clause into Part 5: 5.24 Second-hand Dwelling Requirements
5.24.1 Notwithstanding any other requirement of the Scheme, all Second-hand dwellings require the planning approval of the local government.
5.24.2 Where a Second-hand dwelling use is proposed it shall comply with the following:
a) A building that has a roof or wall sheeting or any other material such as sound proofing or insulation, that contains asbestos, is not permitted to be relocated until those materials containing asbestos are removed and disposed of in the appropriate manner, prior to transportation. b) All asbestos roofs are to be removed prior to relocation irrespective of condition. c) Within the residential zone, if 50% or more of the existing dwellings within ten (10) lots on either side and on both sides of the road of a subject site have external walls of brick, then the dwelling to be located on the site is to be substantially brick veneered. If a corner site is involved, the calculation will be based on the longer street. If an upgrading of external building materials is necessary, the proposed treatment must be fully detailed on the application. d) If a brick veneer condition is not imposed, then the void area between the floor and natural ground levels is to be enclosed with brickwork, battens or other suitable materials. e) Regardless of external wall materials, all roofs over the main portion of the dwelling are to have a pitch of 10º or greater.
5.24.3 When considering an application for planning approval for a second-hand dwelling, the local government may impose conditions concerning:
a) The external appearance and material finishes, the screening of sub-floor spaces, the addition to or modification to the existing dwelling and the time frame imposed to complete specified work and connect the dwelling or building to lot services; b) The provision of landscaping and/or screening of the building and/or site; and c) The provision of a bond or bank guarantee in favour of the Local Government as surety for the completion of the building to a standard of presentation acceptable to the Local Government within a specified time.
5.24.4 Where the provision of a bond or bank guarantee is required, the Local Government shall refund the payment upon satisfactory completion of the necessary works.
3. Inserting the definition of ‘‘Second-hand Dwelling’ into Schedule 1 as: means a dwelling that has been in a different location, and has been dismantled and transported to another location, but does not include a new modular or transportable dwelling;
|
SCHEME AMENDMENT REPORT
1. INTRODUCTION
Notice of Final Approval of the Shire of Esperance Local Planning Scheme No. 23 (“the Scheme’) was published in the Government Gazette on 19 February 2010.
The introduction of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 changed the exemptions that apply to development. One of these changes was to exempt second hand or relocated dwellings from planning approval as the fall under the definition of a dwelling.
The Department of Planning has advised that this approach has now been amended and that Scheme controls can be put in place to control this form of development.
2 AMENDMENT PROPOSALS
Local Planning Scheme No. 23 does not contain a use class for a second-hand dwelling. To give development control a scheme amendment is required to insert the land use definition and determining the permissibility of the use through the zoning table.
2.1. Inserting ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ into the Land Use Table
It is proposed that ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ added to the Land Use Table as a ‘D’ or Discretionary Use within the Residential, Country Town, Rural Residential, Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture General zones, and as an ‘X’ use within all other zones.
This provision specifies what zones the land use is permitted in.
2.2. Inserting development standard for ‘Second-hand Dwelling’
The Shire currently has a Local Planning Policy dealing with second hand transportable dwellings. The following provisions are based on this policy but are structured to be consistent with the new regulations.
5.24 Second-hand Dwelling Requirements
5.24.1 Where a Second-hand dwelling use is proposed it shall comply with the following:
a) A building that has a roof or wall sheeting or any other material such as sound proofing or insulation, that contains asbestos, is not permitted to be relocated until those materials containing asbestos are removed and disposed of in the appropriate manner, prior to transportation.
b) All asbestos roofs are to be removed prior to relocation irrespective of condition.
c) Within the residential zone, if 50% or more of the existing dwellings within ten (10) lots on either side and on both sides of the road of a subject site have external walls of brick, then the dwelling to be located on the site is to be substantially brick veneered. If a corner site is involved, the calculation will be based on the longer street. If an upgrading of external building materials is necessary, the proposed treatment must be fully detailed on the application.
d) If a brick veneer condition is not imposed, then the void area between the floor and natural ground levels is to be enclosed with brickwork, battens or other suitable materials.
e) Regardless of external wall materials, all roofs over the main portion of the dwelling are to have a pitch of 10º or greater.
5.24.2 When considering an application for planning approval for a second-hand dwelling, the local government may impose conditions concerning:
a) The external appearance and material finishes, the screening of sub-floor spaces, the addition to or modification to the existing dwelling and the time frame imposed to complete specified work and connect the dwelling or building to lot services;
b) The provision of landscaping and/or screening of the building and/or site; and
c) The provision of a bond or bank guarantee in favour of the Local Government as surety for the completion of the building to a standard of presentation acceptable to the Local Government within a specified time.
5.24.3 Where the provision of a bond or bank guarantee is required, the Local Government shall refund the payment upon satisfactory completion of the necessary works.
The insertion of this clause into Local Planning Scheme No. 23 will ensure that second-hand dwellings are considered as a class of development within the Scheme and provide the parameters by which it will be assessed.
2.3. Inserting a definition for ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ into Schedule 1.
The following definition will also be added to Schedule 1 – Dictionary of Defined Words and Expressions for ‘‘Second-hand Dwelling’ to read as follows: means a dwelling that has been in a different location, and has been dismantled and transported to another location, but does not include a new modular or transportable dwelling;
3. LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY
The proposed amendments are consistent with the Local Planning Strategy.
4. CONCLUSION
This amendment assists in maintaining the currency of the Scheme provisions in relation to development control for the use of’ Second-hand Dwelling’.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO. 23
AMENDMENT NO. 20
The Esperance Shire Council under and by virtue of the power conferred upon it in that behalf by the Planning and Development Act, 2005, hereby amends the above local planning scheme by:
1. Inserting ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ as a use into Table No. 1 – Zoning and Land Use Table as a ‘D’ use within the Residential, Country Town, Rural Residential, Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture General zones, and as an ‘X’ use within all other zones.
2. Amending the Scheme by inserting the following clause into Part 5:
5.24 Second-hand Dwelling Requirements
5.24.1 Notwithstanding any other requirement of the Scheme, all Second-hand dwellings require the planning approval of the local government.
5.24.2 Where a Second-hand dwelling use is proposed it shall comply with the following:
a) A building that has a roof or wall sheeting or any other material such as sound proofing or insulation, that contains asbestos, is not permitted to be relocated until those materials containing asbestos are removed and disposed of in the appropriate manner, prior to transportation.
b) All asbestos roofs are to be removed prior to relocation irrespective of condition.
c) Within the residential zone, if 50% or more of the existing dwellings within ten (10) lots on either side and on both sides of the road of a subject site have external walls of brick, then the dwelling to be located on the site is to be substantially brick veneered. If a corner site is involved, the calculation will be based on the longer street. If an upgrading of external building materials is necessary, the proposed treatment must be fully detailed on the application.
d) If a brick veneer condition is not imposed, then the void area between the floor and natural ground levels is to be enclosed with brickwork, battens or other suitable materials.
e) Regardless of external wall materials, all roofs over the main portion of the dwelling are to have a pitch of 10º or greater.
5.24.3 When considering an application for planning approval for a second-hand dwelling, the local government may impose conditions concerning:
a) The external appearance and material finishes, the screening of sub-floor spaces, the addition to or modification to the existing dwelling and the time frame imposed to complete specified work and connect the dwelling or building to lot services;
b) The provision of landscaping and/or screening of the building and/or site; and
c) The provision of a bond or bank guarantee in favour of the Local Government as surety for the completion of the building to a standard of presentation acceptable to the Local Government within a specified time.
5.24.4 Where the provision of a bond or bank guarantee is required, the Local Government shall refund the payment upon satisfactory completion of the necessary works.
3. Inserting the definition of ‘Second-hand Dwelling’ into Schedule 1 as: means a dwelling that has been in a different location, and has been dismantled and transported to another location, but does not include a new modular or transportable dwelling;
a)
ADOPTION
Adopted by resolution of the Council of the Shire of Esperance at the Ordinary Meeting of the Council held on the ___ day of____________ 2016.
................................................
PRESIDENT
................................................
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FINAL APPROVAL
Adopted by Resolution of the local government of the Shire of Esperance at the meeting of the local government held on the ___ day of _________ 20__, and pursuant to that Resolution the Seal of the Municipality was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
................................................
PRESIDENT
................................................
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
RECOMMENDED/SUBMITTED FOR FINAL APPROVAL
................................................
DELEGATED UNDER S.16 OF THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2005
Date...........................................
FINAL APPROVAL GRANTED
................................................
MINISTER FOR PLANNING
Date...........................................
27 January 2016 Page 25
Adoption of Revised Local Planning Policy - Outbuildings
Author/s |
Richard Hindley |
Executive Manager - Statutory Division |
Authorisor/s |
Terry Sargent |
Director External Services |
File Ref: D15/31658
Applicant
Internal
Location/Address
Shire of Esperance
Executive Summary
For Council to proceed with the Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings with one modification under Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2).
Recommendation in Brief
That Council:
1. Resolve in accordance with Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2) to proceed with the Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings with one modification as per Attachment A being;
· In the definition of outbuilding replace the words ‘attached carport’ with ‘carport attached to an enclosed non-habitable structure that is detached from any dwelling.’
2. Under Clause 7.3.2 of State Planning Policy 3.1 Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) seek approval from the Western Australian Planning Commission for the Local Planning Policy – Outbuildings to be a variation to the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes; and
3. Rescind the Council Policy entitled ‘Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings’.
Background
The Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings was originally adopted under Town Planning Scheme No. 22 in August 2008 and was reviewed and made consistent with Local Planning Scheme No. 23 in May 2010. Since this time a large number of applications have been received and a number of outbuildings have exceeded the policy standard in the ‘Residential Zone’.
Council’s currently adopted Outbuildings Local Planning Policy outline permitted development with the approval of the Local Government. In the case of this policy the policy standards can be exceeded where the neighbours do not object to the development.
Council considered a revised policy at its October Ordinary Council Meeting where it was resolved (O1015-015):
That Council
1. Adopt the Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings (Attachment A) as a Council Policy, and;
2. Amend the Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings as per Attachment A in accordance with Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2).
3. Acknowledge that this policy cannot be applied retrospectively
This policy has been prepared to provide a consistent and easily identifiable approach to dealing with compliance matters and seeks to ensure there is transparency in all dealings.
Officer’s Comment
The proposed standard for Outbuildings in the Residential and Future Residential Zones are:
|
Area |
Wall Height |
Ridge Height |
Policy Standard |
· 10% of site area where lot 1000m2 or less; · 100m2 where lot is greater than 1000m2. |
3.6m |
4.2m |
Maximum Variation |
25% |
10% |
10% |
The increased wall height will accommodate a roller door being installed that will allow a caravan or other vehicle to enter the Outbuilding with sufficient clearance.
A clarification has been made to reference the Residential Design Codes in addition to the Scheme as the majority of Residential setbacks are contained in the Residential Design Codes.
It is also proposed that an Outbuilding will not be approved until such time as a Dwelling is substantially commenced on the lot.
Development complying with the Policy Standard would be approved without referral to adjoining landowners.
In the case of this policy any development that is above the Policy Standard will be referred to adjoining landowners for comment. If the variation is within the percentage shown and there are no objections an Outbuilding in the Residential zone would be approved under Delegated Authority.
If an objection is received (that is not considered frivolous or vexatious by the Chief Executive Officer, or cannot be resolved by negotiation) the matter will be referred to Council for consideration.
A number of changes are made in other areas of the policy and these are as follows:
· The definition of an outbuilding has been changed to align it more closely with the R-Codes with the addition of a reference to attached carports. Related to this change of definition a new definition for Enclosed has been added to the Policy.
· The permitted development clause has been modified to reflect the impact of the Clause 61 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2).
· The Maximum Variation provision has been included in the Rural Residential Zone table and the current variation provision has been relocated into this section.
· Reference to the Rural Unsettled zone have been deleted as the zone only applies to vacant crown land and no applications have been lodged in this area since the gazettal of Scheme No.23.
· It is also proposed to reduce the lot size (from 40ha to 20ha) where Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture-General lots are subject to the development requirements for Rural Residential Lots.
· Under the approval process statements have been included that define when applications will be considered under delegated authority and where matters will be referred to Council for determination.
Although no submissions were received on review of the policy one minor modification is required to clarify what constitutes an outbuilding. The current definition of an outbuilding contains the line:
For the purposes of this policy an Outbuilding is also taken to include any attached carport.
The referencing of any attached carport bay may be subject to misinterpretation to include any attached carport to a dwelling which is exempt from this policy. The revised wording will be:
For the purposes of this policy an Outbuilding is also taken to include any carport attached to an enclosed non-habitable structure that is detached from any dwelling.
Consultation
This policy was advertised under Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. At the close of advertising no submissions had been received.
Once Council has adopted the policy it will be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission under Clause 7.3.2 of State Planning Policy 3.1 Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) to seek approval as it is a variation to the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes.
Financial Implications
Nil
Asset Management Implications
Nil
Statutory Implications
Division 2 of Part 2 of the deemed provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2)
Planning and Development Act 2005
Local Government Act 1995 s.2.7(2)(b)
Policy Implications
This item relates to policy development.
Local Planning Policies are guidelines used to assist the local government in making decisions under the Local Planning Scheme and may address land use as well as development requirements. Although Local Planning Policies are not part of the Local Planning Scheme they must be consistent with, and cannot vary, the intent of the Local Planning Scheme provisions. In considering an application for Planning Approval, the local government must have due regard to a Local Planning Policy as required under Clauses 3(5) and 67 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2.
The Council policy that was adopted (this policy) as an interim measure can now be rescinded.
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Facilitate and guide high quality and efficient building and development across the Shire
A community with high quality and efficient buildings and development
a. |
Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings |
|
That Council: 1. Resolve in accordance with Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2) to proceed with the Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings with one modification as per Attachment A being; · In the definition of outbuilding replace the words ‘attached carport’ with ‘carport attached to an enclosed non-habitable structure that is detached from any dwelling.’ 2. Under Clause 7.3.2 of State Planning Policy 3.1 Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) seek approval from the Western Australian Planning Commission for the Local Planning Policy – Outbuildings to be a variation to the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes; and 3. Rescind the Council Policy entitled ‘Local Planning Policy: Outbuildings’. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 29
Policy Name: |
LOCAL PLANNING POLICY: OUTBUILDINGS |
Objective: |
To provide a framework for the approval of outbuildings in the Shire of Esperance. |
Key Words: |
Outbuilding; Outbuildings |
Statutory Compliance: |
· Local Planning Scheme No. 23 · Residential Design Codes |
Policy Aims:
To achieve a balance between providing for the various legitimate needs of residents for outbuildings and minimising any adverse impacts that such outbuildings may have on neighbours, a street, a neighbourhood, locality or the Shire as a whole.
Policy Provisions:
Definitions
Outbuilding: An enclosed non-habitable structure that is detached from any dwelling.
For the purposes of this policy an Outbuilding is also taken to include any carport attached to an enclosed non-habitable structure that is detached from any dwelling.
Enclosed: An area bound on three or more sides by a permanent wall and covered in a water impermeable material.
Reflective Materials: any of the following:
· Zincalume® or similar product
· Any shiny metallic finish; and
· White coloured metallic materials.
Farm Building: a building of a permanent nature, other than a building used or intended to be used for residential purposes, that is on land used for agricultural purposes:
(a) for storage of agricultural products and produce; and/or
(b) for the maintenance of farm machinery used by the occupier of the site;
but does not include Agriculture – Intensive, Industry – Rural, Industry – Service.
Cumulative Total Floor Area: the relevant ‘size’ development requirements as provided for in this Local Planning Policy.
Policy Application Area
Shire of Esperance
Application Information
Where a Planning Application is required to be obtained (refer exempt provisions below), the following information is required to be submitted to enable an assessment of the outbuilding to be undertaken:
· Completed ‘Application for Planning Approval’ form;
· Payment of application fee in accordance with Council’s Fees & Charges Schedule;
· Three (3) copies of the following:
o Site plan (to scale) showing the proposed location of the outbuilding on the land in relation to the lot boundaries and any existing or proposed development on-site (including car parking areas, landscaping areas, effluent disposal areas etc).
o Floor plan(s) (to scale) of the proposed outbuilding.
o Elevations (to scale) of the proposed outbuilding.
o Details on vehicular access arrangements to the outbuilding (if applicable).
o Details on the wall and roof materials to be used, including a colour schedule.
· Accompanying letter detailing the need for the outbuilding, particularly if proposing to exceed the ‘size’ development requirement provisions of this policy.
Exempt Provisions
As per the Permitted Development Policy adopted as a Local Planning Policy under Local Planning Scheme No. 23 and Clause 61 of the Deemed Provisions (set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2), planning approval is not required to be obtained for:
· farm buildings in the Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture-General Zones setback no less than 20 metres from any side boundary and 100 metres from any highway;
· residential outbuildings not exceeding 10% of site area or 60m2 whichever is less with a maximum wall height of 2.5 metres and a ridge height of no more than 4.2 metres, provided that setbacks and cumulative total floor area are in accordance with Scheme requirements.
The above exemption only applies if the subject site is not located within a Special Control Area (excluding Special Control Area 8B where the structure is less than 15 metres in height) as shown on the Local Planning Scheme No. 23 Scheme Maps.
Development Requirements
Ø Outbuildings in Residential and Future Residential Zones
Objective |
The objective of these development requirements is to achieve a balance between: · Providing for the legitimate garaging, storage and other domestic needs of people living in residential areas; and · Minimising the adverse impacts outbuildings may have on the amenity (e.g. peace and quiet), appearance and character of residential neighbourhoods, and on neighbours. |
Permitted Uses of Outbuildings
|
· Must be for legitimate residential purposes. · Use of outbuildings for commercial/business uses is not permitted except where planning approval has been granted for a home based business. · Use of outbuildings for human habitation is not permitted. · An Outbuilding will not be approved until such time as a Dwelling is substantially commenced on the lot. |
Setbacks |
As per provisions of Local Planning Scheme No. 23 and the Residential Design Codes; |
Size |
· Maximum area of outbuilding(s) per lot: o 10% of site area where lot 1000m2 or less; o 100m2 where lot is greater than 1000m2. · Maximum wall height – 3.6 metres · Maximum ridge height – 4.2 metres |
Maximum Variation |
· 25% for Site Area · 10% for Wall or Ridge Height |
Consultation |
Where an application for an outbuilding does not comply with the site and setback provisions referenced above, the application is to be referred to the affected adjoining landowners for comment in accordance with the consultation provisions of the Residential Design Codes. |
Applications for outbuildings that do not comply with the above development requirements will be assessed on a case by case basis and may be permitted subject to the following matters being taken into account in the assessment process:
· Demonstration that the larger size is required to satisfy specific domestic needs;
· The outbuilding will not reduce the amount of open space required by Table 1 of the Residential Design Codes;
· The outbuilding being sited behind the front setback line for the dwelling;
· Use of non-reflective materials on the outbuilding and/or adequate screening from the road and neighbouring properties being provided; and
· Comments from the affected adjoining landowner’s.
If the Maximum Variation is exceeded the matter will be referred to Council with an officers recommendation to refuse the application.
Ø Outbuildings in Rural-Residential Zone
Objective |
The objective of these development requirements is to achieve a balance between: · Providing for the legitimate garaging, storage and other domestic needs of people living in rural-residential areas; and · Minimising the adverse impacts outbuildings may have on the amenity (e.g. peace and quiet), appearance and character of the rural residential area. |
Permitted Uses of Outbuildings
|
· Must be for legitimate residential purposes. · Use of outbuildings for commercial/business uses is not permitted except where planning approval has been granted for a home based business. · Use of outbuildings for human habitation is not permitted unless in accordance with Council’s Temporary Accommodation Policy (subject to a separate application). |
Setbacks |
As per provisions of Local Planning Scheme No. 23 |
Size |
· Maximum area of outbuilding(s) per lot - 200m2. · Maximum wall height – 4.5 metres · Maximum ridge height – 6.0 metres |
Maximum Variation |
· 25% for Site Area · 10% for Wall or Ridge Height · Where buildings of a greater area or height are normally required for a purpose permitted under the Scheme (as may be required for a greenhouse or other sheltered crops in a market garden), the maximum area of outbuildings is not to exceed 25% of the site area or wall height of 6.0 metres. |
Consultation |
Where an application for an outbuilding does not comply with the site and setback provisions referenced above, the application is to be referred to the affected adjoining landowners for comment in accordance with the consultation provisions of the Residential Design Codes. |
Applications for outbuildings that do not comply with the above development requirements will be assessed on a case by case basis and may be permitted subject to the following matters being taken into account in the assessment process:
· Demonstration that the larger size is required to satisfy specific domestic needs;
· The outbuilding being sited behind the front setback line for the dwelling;
· Use of non-reflective materials on the outbuilding and/or adequate screening from the road and neighbouring properties being provided; and
· Comments from the affected adjoining landowner’s.
Ø Outbuildings in Rural Smallholdings and Agriculture-General Zones
· For those ‘Rural Smallholdings’ and ‘Agriculture-General’ zoned lots with a lot area less than 20 hectares, the development requirements for “Rural-Residential” zoned lots apply.
· For those ‘Rural Smallholdings’ and ‘Agriculture-General’ zoned lots with a lot area 20 hectares or greater, the following development requirements apply.
Objective |
The objective of these development requirements is to achieve a balance between: · Providing for the legitimate garaging, storage and other domestic needs of people living in rural areas; and · Minimising the adverse impacts outbuildings may have on the amenity, appearance, character and purpose of the rural area. |
Permitted Uses of Outbuildings
|
· Must be for legitimate residential purposes. · Use of outbuildings for commercial/business uses is not permitted except where planning approval has been granted for a home based business. · Use of outbuildings for human habitation is not permitted unless in accordance with Council’s Temporary Accommodation Policy (subject to a separate application). |
Setbacks |
As per provisions of Local Planning Scheme No. 23 |
Consultation |
Where an application for an outbuilding does not comply with the setback provisions referenced above, the application is to be referred to the affected adjoining landowners for comment in accordance with the consultation provisions of the Residential Design Codes. |
Approval Process
After due assessment of the planning application having regard to the provisions of:
· this Local Planning Policy;
· any other relevant Local Planning Policy or Council policy;
· Local Planning Scheme No. 23;
· Residential Design Codes; and
· any other relevant considerations;
Where a proposed outbuilding exceeds the Maximum Area for an outbuilding by more than 25% in the Residential and Future Residential Zones the application will be referred to Council for determination with a recommendation for refusal.
Where a proposed outbuilding exceeds the Maximum Height (wall or ridge) for an outbuilding by more than 10% in the Residential and Future Residential Zones the application will be referred to Council for determination with a recommendation for refusal.
Should the application be considered appropriate by Planning Services, be within the Maximum Variation (where specified) AND unfavourable comments are not received from the affected adjoining landowners, the application will be considered under Delegated Authority (i.e. does not need to be referred to Council for determination).
Should unfavourable comment be received from the affected adjoining landowners (that is not considered frivolous or vexatious by the Chief Executive Officer, or cannot be resolved by negotiation), the planning application is to be referred to Council for determination.
After due assessment of the planning application, should the recommendation be for refusal (regardless of the comments from the affected adjoining landowner’s), the planning application would be referred to Council for determination.
27 January 2016 Page 35
Proposed Modifications to Outline Development Plan - Lot 25 Keenan Road, Lot 770 Spencer Road, and Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road, Pink Lake
Author/s |
Peter Wilks |
Town Planning Officer |
Authorisor/s |
Terry Sargent |
Director External Services |
File Ref: D16/268
Applicant
Ayton Baesjou Planning on behalf of P J Paxton and Eleven Mile Beach Estate Pty Ltd
Location/Address
Lot 25 Keenan Road, Lot 770 Spencer Road and Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road.
Executive Summary
For Council to note the modifications proposed by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to the proposed Outline Development Plan (ODP) for Lot 25 Keenan Road, Lot 770 Spencer Road and Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road and refer the ODP to the WAPC for final approval.
Recommendation in Brief
That Council resolve to note the modifications proposed by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to the proposed Outline Development Plan (ODP) for Lot 25 Keenan Road, Lot 770 Spencer Road and Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road and refer the ODP to the WAPC for final approval.
Background
Further to the previous Council item of 25 November 2014, where Council granted final approval to the proposed Outline Development Plan (ODP) for Lot 25 Keenan Road, Lot 770 Spencer Road, and Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road, Pink Lake, the Western Australia Planning Commission (WAPC) resolved to grant final approval to the ODP subject to a number of modifications being made to the document and as a matter of course has requested that the Shire of Esperance formally adopt the modifications.
Officer’s Comment
All modifications requested by the WAPC (see Attachment E) have been applied to the documentation by the applicant (see Attachments A through D). The modified documentation requires the approval of Council prior to being resubmitted to the WAPC as per Clause 8.2 of the Structure Plan Framework of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and Clause 22 (1)(b) and Clause 38 (1)(b) of Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
The requested and actioned modifications can be summarised as follows:
ODP Plan
· Align the plan to State Policies in particular State Planning Policy 3.7 – Planning in Bush Fire Prone Areas, State Planning Policy 4.1 – State Industrial Buffer Policy , Department of Health Guidelines and EPA guidelines; and
· Modify Lot 9002 to have a minimum lot size of 2ha consistent with the Priority 2 Water Reserve consistent with the Scheme.
Report
· Make consistent with the new Structure Planning Framework;
· Make the report consistent with the ODP Plan changes; and
· Make the report consistent with Local Planning Scheme No. 23.
The above list heuristically describes the changes and a full list of modifications is contained in Attachment E.
All modifications are in accordance with current State Policy, the Local Planning Strategy and Local Planning Scheme No. 23, and as such Shire officers see no reason not to adopt the proposed modifications.
Consultation
No further advertising or consultation is required as a result of the proposed modifications.
Financial Implications
Fees of $7,100.00 were received as part of the application.
Asset Management Implications
The proposed modifications will result in an increase in the number of water supply tanks for bushfire fighting purposes from 4 to 10 at a rate of 1 per 25 lots.
All water tanks will be vested in the Shire of Esperance.
Should the proposal reach the development stage, the Shire of Esperance will be responsible for the on-going maintenance of all roads within the development.
tatutory Implications
The statutory implications associated with this item are:
· Planning and Development Act 2005
· Town Planning Regulations 1967
· Local Planning Scheme No. 23
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012-2022
Economic
3.8 Facilitate and guide high quality and efficient building and development across the Shire.
Local Planning Strategy
Precinct 24 – Pink Lake West
Strategies:
· Manage low key development of the precinct to ensure that land use is compatible with land capability and suitability recognising the considerable environmental constraints.
· Ensure best practice subdivision design that recognises and addresses the environmental constraints and minimises the need for land clearing.
· Encourage the development of a low key, day to day needs local commercial facility.
Actions:
Ø An Outline Development Plan (ODP) will be required for superblocks within the precinct, prior to any further subdivision with the following issues being addressed.
i. Measures to protect the Lake Warden Catchment Recovery Area.
ii. Direct impacts to Pink Lake are buffered by vegetated Reserves 24511 and 2064, which are gazetted for ‘conservation of flora and fauna’.
iii. Mosaic of ‘high’ capability (flats and swales) and ‘fair’ to ‘low’ capability land (dune ridges).
iv. Areas identified as having valuable vegetation and/or high fire risk will be required to be excluded from subdivision or development and suitably protected, as their preservation is important to prevent soil erosion and maintain habitat.
v. Areas are susceptible to wind erosion and dune remobilisation if vegetation cover is removed.
vi. The possible presence of basic raw materials (sand, clay, gravel, limestone and hard rock) is to be addressed and every effort should be made to extract significant deposits prior to subdivision. Developers will be encouraged to use suitable material extracted from the site, within the roads of the subdivision. A rehabilitation plan will be required to be submitted and implemented prior to the final clearance of the subdivision being granted. Small-scale extraction operations associated with the construction of a subdivision may be supported if the development of the area is staged. Commercial scale operations adjacent to staged subdivisions will not be supported.
vii. Site-specific hydrogeological and nutrient balance investigations may be required for any larger-scale developments to establish the relationship between groundwater and Pink Lake, and to address any associated risk to its nutrient and biological status.
viii. Pink Lake may be considered for listing under the Ramsar Convention.
ix. Fire management plan is to be prepared in associated with subdivision design; recommended works (including strategic fire breaks and water tanks) of the plan are to be constructed concurrently with the construction of the lots, with site specific fire management plans being prepared for each individual house at the time a building license is applied for.
x. Adherence to Department of Water – Water Source Protection Plan for protection of public water supply in relation to licensing requirements, land use activities, lot sizes and septic tank setback distances from well heads.
xi. Land uses that cannot be serviced by a Council approved on-site effluent disposal system will not be permitted.
xii. Development proponents to ensure that prospective purchasers are aware that abstraction of groundwater for rural-residential development is likely to be limited to 1,200m3 per lot per year and may require a license.
xiii. Dwelling and outbuildings are to be located within pockets of better capability land rather than on sensitive dune ridges; building exclusion zones are to be identified on the plan of subdivision.
xiv. Roads to be constructed/upgraded, including gazetted access roads, in accordance with Council’s adopted standards.
xv. No extensive or intensive agricultural pursuits or potentially inappropriate land uses will be permitted within the precinct without referral to the Department of Environment and Conservation.
Ø Due to the topography and environmental issues within the precinct, lot sizes will vary to accommodate good subdivision design.
Ø Lot sizes within the precinct in the range of 1ha – 4 ha.
Ø An outlined development plan is to be prepared with lots ranging from 1ha to 4ha, although larger lots may be appropriate in some areas.
Ø Any outline development plan is to be referred to the Department of Environment and Conservation and the EPA service unit.
Ø The ‘no subdivision area’ as illustrated on the Strategy Map may be utilised as a building exclusion zone.
Ø Provision for a low scale daily needs local commercial facility should be incorporated into the Scheme through an amendment to the scheme’s additional use schedule, upon a suitable site being identified.
Environmental Considerations
The proposed Outline Development Plan has had regard to the environmental and sustainability issues of the proposal.
a. |
Outline Development Plan - Under Separate Cover |
|
b. |
Appendix A - Under Separate Cover |
|
c. |
Appendix B - Under Separate Cover |
|
d. |
Appendix C - Under Separate Cover |
|
e. |
List of modifications requested by WAPC |
|
That Council note the modifications and adopt the modified Outline Development Plan for Lot 25 Keenan Road, Lot 770 Spencer Road and Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road, Pink Lake as per Clause 8.2 of the Structure Plan Framework of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and Clause 22 (1)(b) and Clause 38 (1)(b) of Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
000
Street, Suburb, Western Australia Postcode Telephone (08) 9xxx xxxx Facsimile (08) 9xxx xxxx
Email: xxx@xxxxx.xx.xxx.xx webaddress.xxx.xx.xxx.xx
Our
ref: SPN/0687
Enquiries: Johanna Dowsett (65519191)
Delma Baesjou
Ayton Baesjou Planning
59 Peels Place
ALBANY WA 6330
Transmission via electronic mail to: delma@aytonbaesjou.com.au
Dear Ms. Baesjou
Shire of Esperance
Structure Plan Number - ESPE/2015/1
STRUCTURE PLAN MODIFICATION AND RESUBMISSION
Thank you for application for Outline Development Plan for Lots 25, 770 and 9002 Pink Lake West, Shire of Esperance (the "Structure Plan") requesting final endorsement of the Western Australian Planning Commission.
The WAPC has resolved to give its final endorsement to the Structure Plan following modifications being undertaken by Ayton Baesjou Planning, as the person who prepared the Structure Plan, in accordance with those outlined in the attached Schedule of Modifications.
Following these modifications being undertaken and the Shire of Esperance, formally adopting this modified Structure Plan, please lodge the modifications to the WAPC for its final endorsement.
Please include the Structure Plan Number ESPE/2015/1 on the cover page of the document, and an endorsement page in the same format as the Structure Plan Framework, Appendix 2.
Should you have any queries, please contact the assigned planning officer listed above.
Once the modifications are completed please submit a digital electronic version of the documents to the Western Australian Planning Commission for final determination.
Yours sincerely,
Tim Hillyard
Secretary
Western Australian Planning Commission
10.11.2015
cc: Richard Hindley and Peter Wilks, Shire of Esperance
via email - peter.wilks@esperance.wa.gov.au and richard.hindley@esperance.wa.gov.au
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 40
The Western Australian Planning Commission requires the following modifications -
No. |
Section |
Modification |
Reason |
|
ODP - Plan, Version April 2015 |
||||
1. |
Development Requirements Text Box |
Fifth paragraph. Water supply: Delete 250m2 and replace with 565m2 minimum roof collection area and state that this figure is without any bore water supplementing water supply of the individual lots. |
To accord with the Rural Planning Guidelines and the WAPC Rainfall Calculator. Unless proponent provides sustainable alternative option in accordance with point 1 of letter. |
|
2. |
Development Requirements Text Box |
After sixth paragraph, new paragraph: Insert - "Lots with ATUs will require 3 monthly maintenance by an authorised person, and the maintenance reports provided to the Local Government under the Department of Health's 'Code of Practice for the Design Manufacture Installation and Operation of ATUs Serving Single Dwellings". And insert - "Keeping of livestock is precluded on all of the lots". |
To ensure that local government, future subdividers and prospective purchasers are aware of their ongoing responsibilities as it relates to ATUs, in accordance with Department of Health requirements. |
|
3. |
Vegetation Text Box |
Delete current text and replace with - Modify: "50% of the vegetation is to be retained across the site in accordance with the Shire of Esperance Local Planning Strategy objectives for the precinct. The significant ridgelines function as green corridors and are to remain vegetated to protect from erosion of ridges. Clearing of vegetation is precluded from development exclusion areas. Development on remaining vegetated lots is to occur off the ridgelines to protect vegetation and to avoid the need for clearing of ridgelines as a result of fire protection measures for buildings. The pattern of subdivision of vegetated lots with ridgelines may be subject to change depending on detailed planning and design at that stage and compliance with avoiding development on ridgelines and minimising clearing for bushfire management. A local development plan will be required for the identified lots" |
Current text statements do not align with the Strategy requirement for 50% vegetation retention.
To align the statements with the Local Planning Strategy objective on Plan 2. |
|
4. |
P2 text box |
Include additional dot point - "2ha minimum lot size" and provide a dot point for "ATUs required". |
To align with Scheme requirements and Department of Health advice in cl.6.8. |
|
5. |
Basic Raw Materials |
Identify the quarry on the lot for future planning/assessment purposes. Include wording in report regarding the staging of development and proposals for the quarry. |
To comply with Basic Raw Materials and Buffer policies, and EPA Guidance Statement 3. |
|
6. |
Significant Views (yellow text box) |
Identify lots for further local development planning and notate on plan that the final design and layout of these lots will be subject to demonstrating to the capacity of the lots to accommodate the intended development and fire management requirements, particularly clearing and setbacks while avoiding development and clearing of ridgelines. |
To ensure that the intended lots are capable of development while avoiidng clearing vegetation on ridgelines subject to erosion and ensuring balanced environmental and fire maangement outcomes are achieved as per the Strategy objectives and SPP3.7's objective 5.4 "Achieve a responsible and balanced approach between bushfire risk management measures and landscape amenity and biodiversity conservation objectives". |
|
7. |
Bushfire Safety Text Box |
Include additional sentence at the end: "A Bushfire Management Plan has been prepared for the ODP which prescribes building protection zones and hazard separation zones for the lots." |
To indicate the preparation of the bushfire management plan, as well as the AS3959 and assessment conducted. |
|
8. |
Lot 9002 |
Redesign to reflect a 2ha minimum lot size. Cul-de-sacs and battle-axe lots should be avoided where possible. |
To comply with P2 (SCA 4) requirements for a 2ha minimum in the scheme. Access design revisions in accordance with draft SPP3.7, appendix 4. |
|
9. |
Water tank sites |
Identify additional sites for communal water tanks. Water tanks are to be provided on 1 tank per 25 lot basis or part thereof. Approximate lot yield is 250 lots which equates to 10 communal tank sites that need to be identified and developed with subdivision. Only 4 sites provided on present plan. |
In accordance with draft SPP 3.7 guidelines appendix 4, E4 50000L tank required per 25 lots or part thereof. |
|
10. |
Spencer Road |
Landscaping to be provided along Spencer Road to provide buffering between development and Pink Lake. |
Buffering and visual impact. |
|
11. |
Quarry |
Identify the quarry on the subject lots and include a notation that "a rehabilitation plan will be required prior to subdivision". |
To accord with SPP 4.1 Industrial Buffer Policy, and guidance available from SPP2.4 Basic Raw Materials and EPA Guidance Statement No. 3, and the ELPS Precinct 24, issue vi. |
|
12. |
Staging |
Indicate on the ODP or within the ODP report the proposed staging of lots for development. |
For information and to guide future subdivisions and provision of infrastructure. |
|
ODP Report |
||||
13. |
Terminology |
Include sentence within Executive Summary stating "This Outline Development Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Shire of Esperance Local Planning Strategy requirements. The term Outline Development Plan is the same as a 'Structure Plan' within contemporary planning terminology." |
To reflect contemporary planning terminology. |
|
14. |
Structure |
Include before the contents page: · WAPC Endorsement Page (after cover page and before contents page · Table of Amendments · Executive Summary And then provide contents page onwards of the report. |
In accordance with Structure Plan Framework. |
|
15. |
Executive Summary |
Insert executive summary as per above, and include the relevant portions from the 'structure plan summary table' from the Structure Plan Framework, with all relevant information for the proposal. |
In accordance with Structure Plan Framework |
|
16. |
Insert a 'Part One - Implementation' Section |
'Part One - Implementation' to provide the following information: · ODP Plan · Description of the ODP area · Operation - date that the ODP comes into effect · Staging plan - details of which areas will be subdivided and which infrastructure will be provided in each stage · Subdivision and development requirements - details outlined below. · Additional information - table of any additional information required prior to subdivision (i.e. quarry rehabilitation plan). |
In accordance with Structure Plan Framework |
|
17. |
Part One - Subdivision and Development Requirements |
Outline the subdivision and development requirements for the next stages of development and planning. These include - · Notifications on title regarding the absence of water and sewer, and the need for ATUs and their ongoing management on the relevant lots; · The need to refer future subdivision proposals to DoW and advise of the likely groundwater abstraction requirements to provide for indoor and outdoor use for their information; · Proof of ongoing sustainable water supply to the lots; · The need for late winter/ early spring on site investigations to determine the water levels of the lots to inform the preferred type and location of waste water disposal methods; · Demonstrate that individual lots are capable of accommodating future buildings and fire management requirements without requiring broad scale clearing of vegetation or development on sensitive ridgelines; · Notifications on title advising prospective purchasers of fire management plan and AS3959 construction standards; · Advice to prospective purchasers regarding restrictions on horses and stock on the lots; · 50m development exclusion area along Spencer Road and landscape screening to provide a buffer to Pink Lake; · A rehabilitation plan for the quarry will be required prior to subdivision of the quarry lot and / or adjacent areas. |
|
|
18. |
Use existing ODP Report as 'Part Two - Explanatory Report' |
'Part Two - Explanatory Report' to provide the existing information p.2-28 of the ODP Report.
|
In accordance with Structure Plan Framework |
|
19. |
Appendices |
Provide a cover page for each technical report stating the appendix number and report title. Include the list of technical appendices and their appendice number within the contents page. |
For clarity/useability and in accordance with Structure Plan Preparation Framework |
|
20. |
Introduction |
Second paragraph, edit text as follows: "The subject land is within Precinct 24 Pink Lake West of the Shire of Esperance Local Planning Strategy (ELPS). The proposal is in accordance with the ELPS, and is consistent with decisions by the Council for the Shire of Esperance and the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)..." |
Grammar, and consistency with terminology later in the document. |
|
21. |
Section 3.1, last paragraph |
Start first sentence with "Lot 9002 in the southern portion..." After first sentence include additional information: "The objectives within SCA 4 are to: a) provide a basis for the protection of public drinking water resources (PDWSA) through the control of land use or development, which has the potential to prejudice the quality of water supplies for public use; b) identify land that has been designated as groundwater reserves and surface catchment areas that supply public drinking water; c) ensure that any land use does not detrimentally impact on a public drinking water source; d) implement Scheme controls that are designed to mitigate any adverse effects on a public drinking water source. Clause 6.8.4(c)(i) of LPS 23 also requires a 2ha minimum lot size within Rural Residential zones in P2 areas." |
For clarity and consistency with 6.8 of LPS 23. |
|
22. |
3.2, ELPS |
Local Planning Strategy, include additional aim from the ELPS within dot points: "Protect amenity and enhance the quality of urban, rural and coastal environments." |
To cover all relevant points. |
|
23. |
3.2 |
Third paragraph relating to Part 6.5 Rural Living. Delete point 'D' text. |
Point D relates to consideration of proposals to rezone land to Rural Living. The subject lots are already zoned Rural Residential. |
|
24. |
3.2 |
After paragraph providing 6.5 ELPS details include additional paragraph as follows: "Parts 6.12.3 Biodiversity, 6.12.4 Fire Risk and Management and 6.12.5 Basic Raw Materials also provides relevant actions and objectives for the ODP area. These include, retention of vegetation on site, ensuring that issues of dune stability and erosion are considered when it is proposed to clear vegetation to minimise fire risk, and the need for a management plan for the extraction and rehabilitation of basic raw material sites prior to the subdivision. |
To reflect the other Strategy aims and objectives relevant to the site. |
|
25. |
3.2, ELPS |
Paragraph before table, change '25' issues to '15'. |
Typo |
|
26. |
3.2 Table |
vi - include additional sentence in ODP response "buffer and requirement for rehabilitation plan pre-subdivision of this stage is shown on ODP plan and in Part One Implementation". |
To meet ELPS requirements, and reflect prior modifications. |
|
27. |
3.2 Table |
Xiv - requires further work. |
Road networks and upgrading requires further information. Insert proponent information provided in 30 April 2015, Attachment C. |
|
28. |
3.2 Table |
Xv - delete existing ODP response and replace with "LPS 23 prohibits extensive and intensive agricultural uses in the Rural Residential zone. As no livestock is permitted on the lots existing discretionary 'A' uses of stables, rural pursuit, and animal establishment will also not be possible on the lots". |
To recognise that no livestock can proceed on the lots, and recognise those discretionary uses within the scheme which may conflict with this restriction. Reflects 'development requirements' text box modification on ODP Plan above. |
|
29. |
3.2, Actions Table |
Point 4, ODP response, change text to "ODP referred to the Department of Parks and Wildlife (previously Department of Environment and Conservation, and EPA prior to finalisation". Change 'achieved' column from ongoing to 'yes'. |
To reflect status after advertising. |
|
30. |
3.2, Actions Table |
Point 6, ODP response, change text to "Indicative site for corner store notated on ODP, however any proposal for this use will require a scheme amendment prior to proceeding". |
To note LPS 23 permissibility's. |
|
31. |
3.2, ELPS Plan 2 Table |
Point 1, ODP response. Update text with final lot sizes and averages once modifications completed. |
To reflect prior modifications above, and points 3, 5 and 6 of letter. |
|
32. |
3.2, ELPS Plan 2 Table |
Point 3, 50% of vegetation to be retained according to the ELPS. No quality of vegetation percentage provided in ELPS. Update ODP response with the amount of vegetation to be retained on site. |
To demonstrate compliance. |
|
33. |
5.1, Public Drinking Water Source Areas |
Third paragraph, include as last sentence "The WAPC's State Planning Policy 2.7 Public Drinking Water Source Policy and provides the land use planning policy within the Priority 2 area." |
To reference WAPC policy also. |
|
34. |
5.1, p.17 |
Delete first two paragraphs on WQPN 54 and LPS 23 zoning. Replace text, as follows: "The Rural Residential zone within LPS 23 does not set a minimum lot size, while the ELPS Precinct 24 specifically states 1 to 4ha. However, the SCA 4 sets a lot size of 2ha minimum within P2 Public Drinking Water Source Areas (PDWSA). SCA 4 also includes reference to the Department of Water's Water Quality Protection Note (WQPN) providing for additional conditions to be placed on lots in P2 areas, such as precluding livestock." |
To reflect LPS 23 requirements and clarify policy positions. |
|
35. |
5.1, p.17 |
Third paragraph, update the amount of lot numbers within lot 9002, and update the lot area to approximately 80ha. |
To reflect prior modifications. |
|
36. |
5.1, p.17 |
Delete fourth paragraph as policy requirements are outlined above. |
To reflect prior modifications. |
|
37. |
5.1, p.18 |
Second last paragraph - typo - 'constraints' |
Typo |
|
38. |
5.2, Wetland and Groundwater Buffers, p.18 |
Edits needed - Water Management Strategy is 'District Water Management Strategy' and the acronym should be DWMS throughout paragraphs 2 and 3. Paragraph one include '(ATUs)' after 'nutrient absorbing wastewater treatment systems'. |
Edits |
|
39. |
5.2, p/18 |
Include reference to SPP 2.9 Water Resources and outlined compliance. |
To give WAPC policy due regard. |
|
40. |
5.3, Vegetation Retention |
Rewrite section- Identify - how much vegetation is on site and how much is to be cleared, to demonstrate compliance with the local planning strategy 50% retention requirement. Include statements regarding the location of development away from ridgelines to protect from clearing and erosion of these areas. Identify that the final lot layout and design for some of the vegetated lots with ridgelines may be subject to change subject to further planning and design at subdivision stage to account for the natural features on site. |
Clarifications needed, relates back to prior modifications above, and points 3, 5 and 6 of letter. |
|
41. |
5.4, Cultural Heritage |
Italicise the Aboriginal Heritage Act1972 |
Editorial |
|
42. |
5.5, Access and Linkages |
Include information provided by proponent in April 2015, attachment C. |
To reflect additional information provided. The Shire will be able to place conditions regarding road requirements at subdivision stage. |
|
43. |
5.6, Water Supply |
Include as first sentence "A reticulated water supply is not available to the proposed lots". Remainder of section requires review to include the minimum roof collection size requirement and state that this figure is without any bore water supplementing water supply of the individual lots. |
To reflect prior modifications and the need for ongoing sustainable water supply. |
|
44. |
5.7, Waste Water |
Include as first sentence "A reticulated sewerage supply is not available to the proposed lots". Include sentence outlining the ongoing management requirements for ATUs in accordance with the Department of Health's Code of Practice for the Design, Manufacture, Installation and Operation of ATUs Serving Single Dwellings. |
For clarity. |
|
45. |
5.8, Fire Safety |
Update paragraphs 5 - include requirement for 50,000L communal tanks to be provided 1 per 25 lots or part therefor in accordance with the draft SPP3.7 guidelines. Paragraph 6 - note that the final subdivision design and development will need to account for the fire management requirements, including clearing of vegetation, to demonstrate acceptability of on-the-ground proposals at that detailed stage. |
To reflect prior modifications. |
|
46. |
New Section - 5.9 |
Threatened Ecological Communities - include text regarding TECs information from the Land Capability consultant, DPaW, and the EPBC Act requirements. |
To reflect DPaW advice, EPBC Act requirements. |
|
47. |
6.1, Response to Site Characteristics |
Update lot ranges (minimum and maximum) and averages within this section. |
To exclude Lots 1-9, and reflect prior modifications above. |
|
48. |
6.1 |
Second paragraph, update road reserve statements. |
To reflect prior modifications. |
|
49. |
6.1 |
Paragraph three, replace first sentence with "Precinct 24 of the ELPS provides a range of lot sizes from 1 to 4ha. LPS 23 requires a minimum 2ha within Lot 9002 P2 area. The ODP provides.... Delete last sentence. |
To reflect prior modifications. |
|
50. |
6.2, Staging |
Provide a likely indication of the staging proposed across the site. |
No staging identified at present. |
|
51. |
7, Population Growth |
Delete existing information. Replace text with - "WA Tomorrow provides the population and demographic estimates for the State. Population in the Shire of Esperance at the 2011 Census was 13,880 persons. WA Tomorrow provides for a range of growth scenarios of which the predicted growth for the Shire of Esperance is 340 (low growth scenario) and 1740 additional persons (high growth scenario) in 2026. 107 rural residential/special residential lots were created in the Shire of Esperance in the decade up to December 2014. While 527 lots were created for residential purposes over this period (17% of all lots were therefore rural residential/special residential over this period). This represents an average of 11 rural residential lots created per year, with the most lots created being 25 in 2007. Based on the historical rate and high scenario projected populations for the Shire of Esperance it is estimated that approximately 10 lots per year may be developed within the ODP area over the next 10 years." |
Information is currently very general and does not provide figures to demonstrate demand or population in the Shire area. Information provided reflects WA Tomorrow and Urban Development Program Data available from Department of Planning. |
|
27 January 2016 Page 50
Proposed Road Closure - Portion of Road Reserve adjoining Lot 606 Doak Place, Castletown
Author/s |
Peter Wilks |
Town Planning Officer |
Authorisor/s |
Terry Sargent |
Director External Services |
File Ref: D16/357
Applicant
G M Graham
Location/Address
Unconstructed Portion of Stable Road adjoining Lot 606 Doak Place, Castletown
Executive Summary
For Council to grant final approval to the closure of an unconstructed portion of the road reserve for Stable Road, where it adjoins Lot 606 Doak Place, Castletown.
Recommendation in Brief
That Council:
1. Request the Minister of Lands to close the road reserve known as a portion of Stable Road under Section 58 (1) of the Land Administration Act 1997.
2. Advise the Minister of Lands that in accordance with Section 56 (4) of the Land Administration Act 1997 that the Shire recognises that it is liable to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation in an amount equal to the amount of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Minister in considering and granting the request.
3. Requires all costs associated with the road closure process in regard to title adjustments and new titles to be met by the applicant.
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 25th August 2015, Council resolved (O0815-005):
That Council initiate the road closure process for the unconstructed portion of the road reserve for Stable Road, where it adjoins Lot 606 Doak Place, Castletown, in accordance with Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997.
Subsequent to this resolution, the proposed Road Closure was advertised from 9 October 2015 to 27 November 2015. Nine (9) submissions were received at the end of the advertising period, eight (8) of which came from government and servicing agencies and one (1) from a landowner in proximity to the proposal. No submissions objected to the proposal.
Officer’s Comment
From a planning and engineering perspective, the closure of the road is appropriate as it is unconstructed. The portion of road reserve that is proposed to be closed will be amalgamated into Lot 606 Doak Place, Castletown, to allow for all structures associated with Lot 606 to be located within the legal boundaries of the property.
Should Council wish to proceed with the closure a formal request will be lodged with the Minister for Lands under Section 58(1) of the Land Administration Act 1997 to close the road portion and amalgamate the portion of road reserve into adjoining Lot 606.
Consultation
The road closure process operates under Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997, which requires a minimum 35 day public comment/referral period to all affected landowners and government agencies are to be consulted.
Advertising was undertaken between 9 October 2015 to 27 November 2015. A notice was also placed in the Esperance Express on 16 October 2015.
Nine (9) submissions were received at the end of the advertising period, eight (8) of which came from government and servicing agencies and one (1) from a landowner in proximity to the proposal. No submissions objected to the proposal.
Financial Implications
Once the proposal has been formally adopted by Council, all costs associated with the road closure process in regard to title adjustments and new titles are to be met by the applicant. Furthermore, at this stage the Applicant will need to indemnify the Minister of all costs and charges in association with the closure. Should the Department of Lands insist on closing a larger area of the road reserve in such a way that it affects multiple landowners, the costs for title adjustments and new titles will need to be met by the applicable affected landowners.
An application fee of $700 applies to this application.
Asset Management Implications
This application has been referred to Asset Management, they have identified that there are no plans for the construction of this section of Stable Road, as such it is not seen that the proposal has any asset management implications.
Statutory Implications
Local Government Act 1995
Land Administration Act 1997
Policy Implications
Engineering Policy ENG 006: Permanent Road Closures
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Facilitate and guide high quality and efficient building and development across the Shire
A community with high quality and efficient buildings and development
a. |
Plans of proposed Road Closure |
|
b. |
Schedule of Submissions |
|
That Council: 1. Request the Minister of Lands to close the road reserve known as a portion of Stable Road under Section 58 (1) of the Land Administration Act 1997. 2. Advise the Minister of Lands that in accordance with Section 56 (4) of the Land Administration Act 1997 that the Shire recognises that it is liable to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation in an amount equal to the amount of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Minister in considering and granting the request. 3. Requires all costs associated with the road closure process in regard to title adjustments and new titles to be met by the applicant. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
27 January 2016 Page 58
Proposed Road Closure - Landfill Road, Bandy Creek
Author/s |
Peter Wilks |
Town Planning Officer |
Authorisor/s |
Terry Sargent |
Director External Services |
File Ref: D16/398
Applicant
Internal (Statutory Division)
Location/Address
Landfill Road, Bandy Creek
Executive Summary
For Council to grant final approval to the closure of Landfill Road, Bandy Creek.
Recommendation in Brief
That Council:
1. Request the Minister of Lands to close the road reserve known as Landfill Road under Section 58 (1) of the Land Administration Act 1997.
2. Advise the Minister of Lands that in accordance with Section 56 (4) of the Land Administration Act 1997 that the Shire recognises that it is liable to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation in an amount equal to the amount of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Minister in considering and granting the request.
3. Requires all costs associated with the road closure process in regard to title adjustments and new titles to be met by the Shire of Esperance.
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 25th August 2015, Council resolved (O0915-013):
That Council initiate the road closure process for Landfill Road, Bandy Creek, in accordance with Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997.
Subsequent to this resolution, the proposed Road Closure was advertised from 9 October 2015 to 27 November 2015. Nine (9) submissions were received at the end of the advertising period, all of which were from servicing agencies and government departments. No submissions objected to the proposal.
Officer’s Comment
From a planning and engineering perspective, the closure of the road is appropriate as Landfill Road is for all intents and purposes an internal access road for the landfill site and includes areas of the site occupied by existing buildings.
Should Council wish to proceed with the closure a formal request will be lodged with the Minister for Lands under Section 58(1) of the Land Administration Act 1997 to close the road portion and amalgamate the portion of road reserve into adjoining Lot 5 Wylie Bay Road (Landfill Site).
Consultation
The road closure process operates under Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997, which requires a minimum 35 day public comment/referral period to all affected landowners and government agencies are to be consulted.
Advertising was undertaken between 9 October 2015 to 27 November 2015. A notice was also placed in the Esperance Express on 16 October 2015.
Nine (9) submissions were received at the end of the advertising period, all of which were from servicing agencies and government departments. No submissions objected to the proposal.
Financial Implications
Once the proposal has been formally adopted by Council, all costs associated with the road closure process in regard to title adjustments and new titles are to be met by the Shire of Esperance. Furthermore, at this stage the Shire of Esperance will need to indemnify the Minister of all costs and charges in association with the closure.
Asset Management Implications
Landfill Road will be incorporated into Lot 5 Wylie Bay Road (Wylie Bay Landfill Site) and as such will not be a public road.
The closure will also include the boom gate and the portion of the Recycling Shed currently built in the road reserve.
Statutory Implications
Local Government Act 1995
Land Administration Act 1997
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Facilitate and guide high quality and efficient building and development across the Shire
A community with high quality and efficient buildings and development
a. |
Plan of proposed Road Closure |
|
b. |
Schedule of Submissions |
|
That Council: 1. Request the Minister of Lands to close the road reserve known as Landfill Road under Section 58 (1) of the Land Administration Act 1997. 2. Advise the Minister of Lands that in accordance with Section 56 (4) of the Land Administration Act 1997 that the Shire recognises that it is liable to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation in an amount equal to the amount of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Minister in considering and granting the request. 3. Requires all costs associated with the road closure process in regard to title adjustments and new titles to be met by the Shire of Esperance. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
27 January 2016 Page 65
12.2 External Services - Commercial Division
12.3 External Service - Community Division
2015 Asset Management Strategy
Author/s |
Bill Parry |
Asset Management Coordinator |
Authorisor/s |
Mathew Walker |
Acting Director Asset Management |
File Ref: D15/31898
Applicant
Asset Management
Location/Address
Shire of Esperance
Executive Summary
To allow Council to consider the 2015 Asset Management Strategy
Recommendation in Brief
That Council adopts the 2015 Asset Management Strategy
Background
Previous Asset Management planning documents adopted by Council included the “Asset Management Strategy 2012 to 2014” and the “Infrastructure Asset Management Plan 2013”. A recent review of the Asset Management Planning process (following diagram) requires that these documents be updated and replaced by the “2015 Asset Management Strategy” and the “Asset Management Plan Summary” (in progress).
The 2015 Asset Management Strategy is a key informing document to the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework legislated in late 2011 and is a dynamic document outlining a clear course of action in applying and supporting the Shire’s Asset Management Policy.
Officer’s Comment
The objective of the Asset Management Strategy is to develop structured actions and resources which enable Council to manage and develop its asset management practices in line with Strategic Plans, Policies, Legislative requirements, community expectations and national guidelines.
The 2015 Asset Management Strategy outlines:
- The current position with respect to Asset Management practice
- Future needs with respect to Asset Management practice
- The current maturity level of Asset Management practice with regard to the nationally recognised levels of competency
- An Improvement and Action Plan on how Council intends to achieve future needs.
- A performance monitoring process
The following chart identifies where the Asset Management Strategy sits in relation to the current Asset Management Planning process.
The National Assessment Framework incorporates evaluation of asset management practices and progress toward achieving core asset management maturity status.
The elements of the framework and a comparison of Council’s current estimated core maturity levels are identified in the following chart.
A summary level view of asset valuations provides a snapshot of rounded values by asset class. A detailed summary including valuations, quantities, performance ratios and data confidence levels will be contained in the “AMP Summary” document.
Asset Class |
Description |
Replacement Cost |
Fair Value (Depreciated Value) |
Annual Depreciation Expense |
Transport |
Roads Kerbs Bridges Culverts Footpaths
|
$415,000,000 |
$312,500,000 |
$9,200,000 |
Buildings |
Buildings for which the Shire has operational, maintenance and renewal responsibilities.
|
$60,929,000 |
$31,626,000 |
$1,224,000 |
Open Space |
Parks & Reserves Sporting grounds Playgrounds Coastal Irrigation Supply Cemetery
|
$46,300,000 |
$17,900,000 |
$1,400,000 |
Drainage |
Pits Pipes Sumps
|
$20,105,000 |
$16,434,000 |
$177,000 |
Fleet |
Major Plant Minor Plant Miscellaneous plant
|
$12,973,000 |
$8,270,000 |
$1,208,000 |
Commercial |
Airport Waste Management Caravan Park
|
$15,830,000 |
$10,219,000 |
$429,000 |
|
Total |
$571,137,000 |
$396,949,000 |
$13,638,000 |
The Improvement Opportunities and Action Plan detailed in Appendix A outlines the areas of opportunity and details the actions required to implement them. Appendix B summarises the identified actions and priorities.
Consultation
The 2015 Asset Management Strategy has been developed in consultation with senior Asset Management staff.
Financial Implications
Nil
Asset Management Implications
The 2015 Asset Management Strategy is a key guiding document in the progressive development of asset management practices and the achievement of national core maturity status.
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Maintain the Shire’s robust asset management practices and maintenance programs
Assets which meet the expectations of the community
a. |
2015 Asset Management Strategy - Under Separate Cover |
|
That Council adopt the 2015 Asset Management Strategy. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 70
General Asset Management Plan
Author/s |
Bill Parry |
Asset Management Coordinator |
Authorisor/s |
Mathew Walker |
Acting Director Asset Management |
File Ref: D15/31899
Applicant
Internal
Location/Address
Shire of Esperance
Executive Summary
To allow Council to consider the General Asset Management Plan
Recommendation in Brief
That Council adopts the General Asset Management Plan as a separate reference document to accompany all infrastructure Asset Management Plans developed in the future.
Background
The “National Asset Management Strategy” (NAMS) system of Asset Management was adopted by Council in 2011, since then all Asset Management Plans have been produced using their prescribed templates.
Officer’s Comment
The current Asset Management Plan (AMP) template includes content that is common to all AMP’s and it is this content that is represented in the proposed General Asset Management Plan. Removing this general reference material will assist in making AMP’s developed in the future a more practical and concise document.
The content of the document will remain linked to the NAMS systems and processes and will be subject to review where significant variations or improvements to the document by NAMS are identified.
Consultation
The General Asset Management Plan and subsequent changes to all future AMP’s have been reviewed by senior Asset Management staff.
Asset Management Implications
The General Asset Management Plan should be read in conjunction with all future AMP’s.
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Maintain the Shire’s robust asset management practices and maintenance programs
Assets which meet the expectations of the community
a. |
2015 General Asset Management Plan - Under Separate Cover |
|
That Council adopt the General Asset Management Plan Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
Asset Management Plan - Stormwater Drainage 2015
Author/s |
Bill Parry |
Asset Management Coordinator |
Authorisor/s |
Mathew Walker |
Acting Director Asset Management |
File Ref: D15/22906
Applicant
Internal
Location/Address
Shire of Esperance
Executive Summary
To allow Council to consider the Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan 2015
Recommendation in Brief
That Council accepts the Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan 2015
Background
The first cut Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan was developed in September 2011 and was based on assumptions and estimates which produced a plan with low confidence and identified several areas for improvement. In 2014, a network survey was undertaken by staff which produced detailed asset data and mapping. This data has been combined with current valuations developed to meet Fair Value accounting requirements in 2015 to produce an AMP with high confidence. Future improvements still include inspection and condition grading of the network but due to the long life of the assets, relatively young age and absence of failures it is not expected for another 10 years.
Officer’s Comment
Assets covered by this plan:
The Stormwater Drainage Network consists of the following assets:
Category |
Quantity |
Replacement Value |
Depreciated Replacement Value |
Annual Depreciation Value |
Sumps |
46 |
$ 2,423,945 |
$ 2,424,000 |
$0 |
Pits |
2,528 |
$ 7,413,680 |
$5,786,528 |
$74,136 |
Pipes |
69.3 km |
$ 9,875,044 |
$7,992,430 |
$98,750 |
Subsurface Network |
40 Pits / 3.5km of Pipe |
$ 392,425 |
$231,531 |
$3,924 |
Total |
|
$20,105,095 |
$16,434,435 |
$176,811 |
Key assumptions used in this plan include:
- Asset condition – drainage network component inspection is a specialised process and given the relatively young age and absence of component failures, condition assessment is based on age and the estimated rate of asset deterioration.
- Asset Useful Life – Drainage network components are a long life asset, the useful life has been estimated at 100 years.
- Date of construction – Dates of construction have been identified using historical records and consulting with experienced shire staff.
Projected Expenditure:
No asset renewals have been identified in this 10 year planning period; correspondingly there is no reported renewal gap.
Asset Condition
Condition grading has been estimated using a deterioration curve based on useful life and age. The following charts indicate current network condition and the estimated condition in 10 years without additional maintenance or renewal budgets. Projections indicate only a minor deterioration in overall condition.
Improvements for future revisions of this AMP include:
- Establish an ongoing process for capture of maintenance records against assets
- Establish an ongoing process for capturing asset data and mapping
- Develop asset hierarchy for inclusion in future maintenance and renewal plans
- Review the need and timing of asset condition inspections
Consultation
This AMP has been developed and reviewed by senior Asset Management staff.
Financial Implications
There are no projected renewals and therefore the financial implications arising from this planning period relate only to budgeted Operation, Maintenance and Upgrade expenditures. A re-valuation of Stormwater Drainage assets has been completed to meet Fair Value accounting requirements in June 2015.
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Economic
Maintain the Shire’s robust asset management practices and maintenance programs
Assets which meet the expectations of the community
a. |
2015 Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan - Under Separate Cover |
|
That Council accept the 2015 Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
27 January 2016 Page 74
Debt Write-Off - Debtor # 3883
Author/s |
Beth O'Callaghan |
Manager Financial Services |
Authorisor/s |
Shane Burge |
Director Corporate Resources |
File Ref: D16/230
Applicant
Corporate Resources
Location/Address
Internal
Executive Summary
For Council to consider writing off outstanding debt of $1,292.50 (Inc GST) for Surefire Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee for the Zakostelsky Family Trust (Debtor No. 4445).
Recommendation in Brief
That Council writes off outstanding debt of $1,292.50 (Inc GST) for Surefire Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee for the Zakostelsky Family Trust (Debtor No. 4445).
Background
In September 2014 Council resolved:
“That Council accept the surrender of lease on Car Hire Desk # 4 at Esperance Airport Terminal from Surefire Enterprises Pty Ltd trading as Jetty Car Hire and accepts $1,292.50 (Inc GST), being the rent for the first year of the agreement as mitigation of the Shire’s loss”.
The outstanding debt was pursued internally initially then referred to AMPAC Debt Recovery Pty Ltd (AMPAC). AMPAC received no response to messages and demands from Surefire, despite having up to date contact details. Legal action proved to be unsuccessful.
During December 2015, WA Insolvency Solutions contacted the Shire to advise they had taken over administration of Surefire Enterprises Pty Ltd. The Shire was advised it was highly unlikely the outstanding invoice would be paid.
Officer’s Comment
Based on WA Insolvency Solutions’ advice it is no longer viable to pursue the outstanding debt.
Consultation
AMPAC Debt Recovery Pty Ltd
WA Insolvency Solutions
Financial Implications
The financial implications arising from this report would be an expense of $1,175 (Exc GST). There is currently a budget for write-offs and debt collection expenses in Financial Services for $10,000. At time of writing this report only $1,500 had been expended.
Asset Management Implications
Nil
Statutory Implications
Local Government Act (1995) Section 6.12 General Financial Provisions
Policy Implications
CORP013: Debt Collection – The objective of this policy is that the Shire of Esperance will actively pursue all outstanding rates and sundry debtors.
The recommended course of action is in line with pursuing all available options to recover the outstanding debt.
Strategic Implications
Strategic Community Plan 2012 - 2022
Civic Leadership
4.5 Be innovative in the management of Shire operations, services, staff and resources to create a resilient and financially stable Shire
Corporate Business Plan 2013/2014 – 2016/2017
4.5.15 Manage Financial Services
Environmental Considerations
Nil
Nil
That Council writes off outstanding debt of $1,292.50 (Inc GST) for Surefire Enterprises Pty Ltd as trustee for the Zakostelsky Family Trust (Debtor No. 4445). Voting Requirement Absolute Majority |
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 76
Financial Services Report - December 2015
Author/s |
Beth O'Callaghan |
Manager Financial Services |
Authorisor/s |
Shane Burge |
Director Corporate Resources |
File Ref: D16/1456
a. |
Monthly Financial Report - December 2015 |
|
That the report entitled Monthly Financial Management Report (incorporating the Statement of Financial Activity) for the month of December as attached be received. Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
27 January 2016 Page 130
Information Bulletin - January 2016
Author/s |
Sarah Fitzgerald |
Administation Officer |
Authorisor/s |
Matthew Scott |
Chief Executive Officer |
File Ref: D16/1460
a. |
Information Bulletin - January 2016 |
|
b. |
Condolences - Esperance Bushfire Disaster - Member for Mandurah |
|
c. |
Thank You - Support and Handling of Esperance Fires |
|
d. |
Letter of Appreciation - Visit To Esperance - Governor of Western Australian |
|
e. |
Thank You - Donation of Achievement Award - Esperance Primary School |
|
f. |
Letter of Appreciation - Support for passengers of the Pacific Eden |
|
g. |
Register - Delegations Discharge – Corporate Resources |
|
H |
Minutes - GVROC Council Meeting - 27 November 2015 |
|
Interplan Report - December 2015 - Under Separate Cover |
|
That Council accept the Information Bulletin for January 2016 including; 1. Condolences - Esperance Bushfire Disaster - Member for Mandurah 2. Thank You - Support and Handling of Esperance Fires 3. Letter of Appreciation - Visit To Esperance - Governor of Western Australian 4. Thank You - Donation of Achievement Award - Esperance Primary School 5. Letter of Appreciation - Support for passengers of the Pacific Eden 6. Register - Delegations Discharge – Corporate Resources 7. Minutes - GVROC Council Meeting - 27 November 2015 8. Interplan Report - December 2015
Voting Requirement Simple Majority |
Ordinary Council: Agenda
27 January 2016 Page 131
Shire of Esperance
INFORMATION BULLETIN
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
27 January 2016
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
Index
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
1 Asset Management
1.1 Grading Report 4
2 Statutory Division 5
Building Applications Approved from 1 December 2015 to 31 December 2015 |
Building Licences |
Cost $ Excluding Land |
Floor Area Sq.M |
No of Buildings |
Main Material of Floor |
Roof Covering |
Materials of External Walls |
Type of Building |
Situation of Building |
Reg No |
Builder Name & Address |
Licence Number |
Name & Address of Owner |
Type of Work |
Approval Date |
Alterations |
Occupancy Permit ‑ Classes 2‑9 |
09/12/2015 |
15242 |
J M Daunt Lot 71 Dunkley Circuit PINK LAKE WA 6450 |
The Esplanade ESPERANCE |
Lot: 921 Pln: 191740 |
S1020 |
464.0 |
1 |
New Building |
Office Building |
16/12/2015 |
15269 |
Dixon Construction 71 The Esplanade ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
Brazier Street CHADWICK |
Lot: 15 P/D: 65554/LS1 L/N: 2853 |
Other |
Steel |
Timber |
61.0 |
2 |
Alterations |
Occupancy Permit ‑ Classes 2‑9 |
24/12/2015 |
15824 |
M T Withers 3 North Road CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
87 Norseman Road CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 51 D: 38934 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
437.0 |
1 |
Refurbishment |
Occupancy Permit ‑ Classes 2‑9 |
11/12/2015 |
16127 |
Sime Building Company Pty Ltd 52 The Esplanade ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
63 Dempster Street ESPERANCE |
Lot: 8 D: 60687 |
10158 |
Brick, double |
Steel |
Concrete |
220.0 |
1 |
New Building |
Patio |
16/12/2015 |
16223 |
R J Gellard 27 Walmsley Street CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
|
27 Walmsley Street CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 709 D: 52120 |
Steel |
46.0 |
1 |
15,000.00 |
Alterations |
Patio |
01/12/2015 |
16244 |
Jollygood Enterprises Pty Ltd 10 Scholey Street SINCLAIR WA 6450 |
105 Burton Road CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 108 Pln: 1376 |
11528 |
Steel |
Other |
35.0 |
1 |
9,899.00 |
New Building |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
01/12/2015 |
16251 |
Glen Echo Pty Ltd 4 Hill Street CHADWICK WA 6450 |
30 Woody Avenue CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 1026 Pln: 400374 |
9556 |
Timber |
Steel |
Concrete |
179.0 |
1 |
247,800.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
07/12/2015 |
16256 |
MT Sheds (WA) Pty Ltd 3 North Road CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
Barook Road PINK LAKE |
Lot: 49 D: 100121 |
S1044 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
180.0 |
1 |
20,000.00 |
Alterations |
Industrial Building |
07/12/2015 |
16257 |
M C Henley 27 Gull Street ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
4 Scanlon Street CHADWICK |
Lot: 83 Pln: 10893 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
69.0 |
1 |
20,000.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
15/12/2015 |
16258 |
S L Hall 3/3 Irene Street CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
Fisheries Road MERIVALE |
S/L: 21 S/P: 60076 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
380.0 |
1 |
50,000.00 |
New Building |
Office Building |
11/12/2015 |
16259 |
Vermey Building Company 25 Butler Street CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
33 McDonald Road CHADWICK |
Lot: 17 Pln: 73198 |
10647 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
35.0 |
1 |
10,000.00 |
Alterations |
Retail Building |
10/12/2015 |
16260 |
FDC Construction & Fitout (WA) Pty Ltd 45 Ventnor Avenue WEST PERTH WA 6005 |
1 Forrest Street ESPERANCE |
Lot: 508 D: 71396 |
100621 |
900,000.00 |
Alterations |
Patio |
16/12/2015 |
16261 |
K L Lear 97 Goldfields Road CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
7 Sherwood Place SINCLAIR |
Lot: 82 Pln: 9425 |
Not Specified |
Steel |
Concrete |
12.0 |
1 |
8,000.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
22.0 |
1 |
10,000.00 |
New Building |
Patio |
07/12/2015 |
16262 |
H M Mannix 44 Hockey Place WEST BEACH WA 6450 |
44 Hockey Place WEST BEACH |
Lot: 860 Pln: 190984 |
Timber |
Steel |
Timber |
15.0 |
1 |
5,000.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
10/12/2015 |
16263 |
Wrinkly Tin & Cladding Company Pty Ltd 3 Corry Street ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
61 Thistle Avenue BANDY CREEK |
Lot: 224 Pln: 64773 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
30.0 |
1 |
9,800.00 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Building Applications Approved from 1 December 2015 to 31 December 2015 |
Building Licences |
Cost $ Excluding Land |
Floor Area Sq.M |
No of Buildings |
Main Material of Floor |
Roof Covering |
Materials of External Walls |
Type of Building |
Situation of Building |
Reg No |
Builder Name & Address |
Licence Number |
Name & Address of Owner |
Type of Work |
Approval Date |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
04/12/2015 |
16268 |
J M Hastings 10 Eyre Street ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
23 Anderson Street GIBSON |
Lot: 33 Pln: 167575 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
30.0 |
1 |
7,000.00 |
New Building |
Carport |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
23.0 |
1 |
3,000.00 |
Alterations |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
5.0 |
1 |
10,000.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
16/12/2015 |
16270 |
R W Franceschi 27 Emily Street ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
21 Baleine Drive CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 986 Pln: 52175 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
84.0 |
1 |
18,000.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
14/12/2015 |
16272 |
T L Greig Lot 24 Barook Road PINK LAKE WA 6450 |
Barook Road PINK LAKE |
Lot: 24 Pln: 52171 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
48.0 |
1 |
10,000.00 |
New Building |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
10/12/2015 |
16274 |
Maguire (WA) Pty Ltd 22B Andrew Street ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
21 Waterlily Way CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 1067 Pln: 400374 |
13090 |
Brick, veneer |
Steel |
Concrete |
321.0 |
1 |
405,097.00 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
36.0 |
1 |
New Building |
Garage/Shed |
11/12/2015 |
16275 |
M G Williams PO BOX 210 Ravensthorpe WA 6346 |
|
Mississippi Bend PINK LAKE |
Lot: 513 Pln: 54667 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
200.0 |
1 |
35,000.00 |
New Building |
Patio |
23/12/2015 |
16278 |
A B Willoughby 32 Magnolia Crescent CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
32 Magnolia Crescent CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 267 Pln: 11084 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
80.0 |
1 |
6,000.00 |
New Building |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
14/12/2015 |
16280 |
Maguire (WA) Pty Ltd 22B Andrew Street ESPERANCE WA 6450 |
48 Woody Avenue CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 763 Pln: 400374 |
13090 |
Timber |
Steel |
Concrete |
380.0 |
1 |
572,682.00 |
Alterations |
Retail Building |
15/12/2015 |
16282 |
FGS Contracting Esperance 6450 |
69A Dempster Street ESPERANCE |
Lot: 3 D: 23488 |
101335 |
1 |
5,000.00 |
New Building |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
17/12/2015 |
16283 |
Ryan Dixon PTY LTD T/A Dixon Construction The Esplanade Esperance WA 6450 |
84 Walmsley Street BANDY CREEK |
Lot: 280 Pln: 69443 |
14605 |
Brick, veneer |
Steel |
Concrete |
278.0 |
1 |
317,318.00 |
New Building |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
18/12/2015 |
16286 |
K J Norton 5 Kiwi Close CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
18 Baleine Drive CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 850 Pln: 49174 |
9566 |
Timber |
Steel |
Concrete |
263.0 |
1 |
350,000.00 |
$3,044,596.00 |
25 |
Total number of Building Licences: |
Building Approval Certificates (Unauthorised Structures) |
Cost $ Excluding Land |
Floor Area Sq.M |
No of Buildings |
Main Material of Floor |
Roof Covering |
Materials of External Walls |
Type of Building |
Situation of Building |
Reg No |
Builder Name & Address |
Licence Number |
Name & Address of Owner |
Type of Work |
Approval Date |
Alterations |
Patio |
08/12/2015 |
16253 |
Wells Building Designers & Consultants 29 Amelia Circuit WEST BEACH WA 6450 |
Barook Road PINK LAKE |
Lot: 10 Pln: 52171 |
1 |
15,000.00 |
Alterations |
Garage/Shed |
09/12/2015 |
16267 |
J A Niikkula 13 Travers Avenue NULSEN WA 6450 |
13 Travers Avenue NULSEN |
Lot: 39 Pln: 9200 |
Steel |
Steel |
Concrete |
32.0 |
1 |
5,000.00 |
Page 2 of 3 |
Building Applications Approved from 1 December 2015 to 31 December 2015 |
Building Approval Certificates (Unauthorised Structures) |
Cost $ Excluding Land |
Floor Area Sq.M |
No of Buildings |
Main Material of Floor |
Roof Covering |
Materials of External Walls |
Type of Building |
Situation of Building |
Reg No |
Builder Name & Address |
Licence Number |
Name & Address of Owner |
Type of Work |
Approval Date |
Alterations |
Patio |
09/12/2015 |
16271 |
T J Harvey 3 North Road CASTLETOWN WA 6450 |
3 North Road CASTLETOWN |
Lot: 165 Pln: 9826 |
Other |
Concrete |
52.0 |
1 |
3,000.00 |
Alterations |
Dwelling ‑ Single |
08/12/2015 |
16273 |
R P Zakostelsky 28 Bailey Street TRIGG WA 6029 |
81 Twilight Beach Road WEST BEACH |
Lot: 112 D: 62871 |
Steel |
1 |
20,000.00 |
New Building |
Carport |
11/12/2015 |
16277 |
K M Waters 31 Sims Street SINCLAIR WA 6450 |
31 Sims Street SINCLAIR |
Lot: 53 Pln: 2260 |
Not Specified |
Not Specified |
Not Specified |
1 |
9,000.00 |
New Building |
Patio |
Not Specified |
Not Specified |
Not Specified |
1 |
10,000.00 |
$62,000.00 |
5 |
Total number of Building Approval Certificates (Unauthorised Structures): |
Total number of Licences/Certificates Reported: |
30 |
$3,106,596.00 |
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, the particulars given in this return are a true and complete record of proposed building operations known to this local authority. |
Signature ........................................... Date ........................................... (Manager Building Services) |
Page 3 of 3 |
27 January 2016 Page 151
GVROC Council Meeting
Friday 27 November 2015
In-Person Meeting
Councillors Conference Room, City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
MINUTES
CONTENTS
1. OPENING AND WELCOME
2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST
3. RECORD OF ATTENDANCE, APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE
3.1 Attendance
3.2 Apologies
4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ELECTION OF STATE COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE
4.1 Delegates and Deputy Delegates to Zone
4.2 Election of WA Local Government Association State Council Representative and Deputy State Council Representative
5. Election of Chair and Deputy Chair to the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils
5.1 Election of Chair and Deputy Chair to the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils
6. Election of Chair and Deputy Chair to the Goldfields Esperance Regional Collaborative Group
6.1 Appointment of Chair and Deputy Chair to the Goldfields Esperance Regional Collaborative Group
7. GUEST SPEAKERS/PRESENTATIONS
7.1 Ms Mandi Warry Former Manager Goldfields Tourism Network Association –Update on the Goldfields Exhibits at the 2015 Royal Show (Attachment)
8. MINUTES OF MEETINGS
8.1 Minutes of a Meeting of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC) Council held Thursday 8 October 2015 (Attachment)
8.2 Minutes of a Meeting of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC) Council held Friday 6 November 2015 (Attachment)
8.3 Business Arising from a Meetings of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC) - November 2015 Status Report
8.4 Matters for Noting
9. GVROC FINANCE
9.1 Financial Statements for period ending 31 October 2015 and Accounts for Payment (Attachment)
10. GOLDFIELDS RECORDS STORAGE FACILITY - FINANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
10.1 Financial Statement for the Period ending 31 August 2015
11. GVROC BUSINESS
11.1 Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint – Submission from the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (Attachment)
11.2 Increase in the Emergency Services Levy
11.3 Southern Rangelands Workshop in Geraldton on Thursday 29 October 2015
11.4 GVROC Meeting with the Director General Department of Mines and Petroleum, Mr Richard Sellers on Thursday 8 October 2015
11.5 GERCG Implementation (Asset Management) Project
11.6 Training for Country Councillors - Phase 3
11.7 Elected Members Training – Local Government Finance
11.8 Census of Local Government Councillors (Attachment)
11.9 Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015
11.10 Meeting with the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal
11.11 Proposed Re-establishment of the WA Police Livestock Squad
12. WESTERN AUSTRALIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION (WALGA) BUSINESS
12.1 State Councillor / Goldfields Esperance Zone President’s Report
12.3 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Matters for Decision
12.4 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Matters for Noting/Information
12.5 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Organisational Reports (Attachments)
12.6 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Policy Forum Reports
12.7 WALGA President’s Report (Attachment)
13. Agency Reports
13.1 Department of Local Government and Communities
14. LATE ITEMS as notified, introduced by decision of the Meeting
14.1 Traineeships
15. FUTURE MEETINGS/FUNCTIONS
16. CLOSURE OF MEETING
Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC)
An in-person meeting of the GVROC Council held Friday 27 November 2015, commencing at 9.11am
MINUTES
1. OPENING AND WELCOME
Cr Cullen opened the meeting at 9.11am, welcoming all in attendance. He also extended GVROC’s sympathy to those effected by the recent Esperance fires, noting that Member Councils would assist the Shire of Esperance where possible.
Pursuant to the Code of Conduct, Councillors and CEOs must declare to the Chairman any potential conflict of interest they may have in a matter before the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils as soon as they become aware of it. Councillors, CEOs and Deputies may be directly or indirectly associated with some recommendations of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils. If you are affected by these recommendations, please excuse yourself from the meeting and do not participate in deliberations.
Cr Mal Cullen (Chair) President, Shire of Coolgardie
Cr Tracey Rathbone Deputy President Shire of Coolgardie
Mr Paul Webb CEO, Shire of Coolgardie
Cr Jacquie Best President Shire of Dundas
Mr Doug Stead CEO Shire of Dundas
Cr Victoria Brown President, Shire of Esperance (entered the meeting via teleconference
at approximately 9.30am)
Cr Basil Parker Councillor, Shire of Esperance (entered the meeting via teleconference
at approximately 9.30am)
Mr Matthew Scott CEO, Shire of Esperance entered the meeting via teleconference
at approximately 9.30am)
Mayor John Bowler Mayor, City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
Cr Suzie Williams Councillor, City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
Mr Rob Radosevich A/CEO, City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
Cr Patrick Hill President, Shire of Laverton
Cr Shaneane Weldon Deputy President, Shire of Laverton
Mr Steve Deckert CEO, Shire of Laverton
Cr Peter Craig President Shire of Leonora
Mr Jim Epis CEO, Shire of Leonora
Cr Jill Dwyer President, Shire of Menzies
Cr Jamie Mazza Councillor, Shire of Menzies
Mr Pascoe Durtanovich A/CEO, Shire of Menzies
Cr Keith Dunlop President, shire of Ravensthorpe
Cr Ian Goldfinch Councillor, Shire of Ravensthorpe
Mr Ian Finch CEO, Shire of Ravensthorpe
Cr Jim Quadrio President Shire of Wiluna
Cr Graeme Harris Deputy President, Shire of Wiluna
Mr Dean Taylor A/CEO Shire of Wiluna
Ms Helen Westcott, Joint Executive Officer
Cr Beverley Stewart, Shire of Esperance
Shire Ngaanyatjarraku
Mr Bruce Wittber, Joint Executive Officer
Ms Mandi Warry (entered the meeting at 10.30am)
Mr Gary Angel, Principal Strategy Officer, Strategy, Research and Initiatives, Department of Local Government and Communities (entered the meeting at approximately 9.30am)
Ms Joanne Burges, Regional Cooperation Manager WALGA (entered the meeting at approximately 9.30am)
4.1 Delegates and Deputy Delegates to Zone
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer/Returning Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 23 November 2015
Attachments: Nil
Following the biennial local government elections Member Councils are to appoint delegates and deputy delegate(s) to the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Council (GVROC) and the Goldfields Esperance Country Zone (GECZ).
At the time of writing the agenda Member Councils had advised their delegates and deputy delegates as follows:
Delegates to GVROC
Council |
Delegates |
Deputy Delegates |
Shire of Coolgardie |
TBA |
TBA |
Shire of Dundas |
TBA |
TBA |
Shire of Esperance |
Cr Victoria Brown Cr Beverly Stewart |
Cr Basil Parker |
City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder |
Mayor John Bowler Cr Suzie Williams |
Cr Laurie Ayers |
Shire of Laverton |
TBA |
TBA |
Shire of Leonora |
Cr Peter Craig Mr Jim Epis |
Cr Matt Taylor Ms Tanya Browning |
Shire of Menzies |
Cr Jill Dwyer Cr Jamie Mazza |
Cr Keith Made CEO |
Shire of Ngaanyatjarraku |
TBA |
TBA |
Shire of Ravensthorpe |
Cr Keith Dunlop Cr Ian Goldfinch |
TBA |
Shire of Wiluna |
TBA |
TBA |
The delegates and deputies to the GECZ were as for GVROC where information had been provided.
The above details are for information purposes only.
No decision required.
4.2 Election of WA Local Government Association State Council Representative and Deputy State Council Representative
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer/Returning Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 23 November 2015
Attachments: Nil
Background:
At the GVROC Council Meeting Friday 28 August 2015 it was resolved as follows:
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Harris Seconded: Cr Cullen
That:
1. Member Councils be requested to advise the Executive Officer of their delegates to the Zone as soon as possible after the 2015 Local Government elections; and
2. that the election of the Zone’s State Council representative, State Council deputy representative, Zone President and Zone Deputy President and Zone Executive Committee be conducted at the Zone meeting scheduled for Friday 27 November 2015.
CARRIED
Executive Officer Comment:
Nominations for the positions of State Council Representative and State Council Deputy Representative were called on Friday 23 October and closed on Friday 20 November 2015. All Member Councils have been advised of the outcome of the nomination process.
At the close of nominations 4.00pm on Friday 20 November 2015 no nominations had been received for either vacancy. As there were no nominations for the either position for the period 2015-2017 nominations will be invited from the floor of the meeting.
The following process will be followed in regard to the election for the position of both State Council Representative and Deputy State Council Representative:
§ The Returning Officer will invite nominations from the floor for the each position, with the election of the State Council Representative to be conducted first;
§ Should a ballot be required the following process will be followed:
o Prior to the ballot nominees for the position will be extended the opportunity to provide a two (2) minute election bid to delegates;
o The ballot will conducted as a secret ballot;
o Each voting delegate will be entitled to cast one (1) vote in the ballot process, with the “first past the post” method of election being used; and
o The candidates with the greater number of votes will be elected with the result being announced to the meeting.
Following the election of the State Council Representative the election of the Deputy State Council Representatives will be conducted.
It should be noted that WALGA has advised the following in regard to a “Tied Vote” for State Council Representative:
Tied vote – in the event of a tied vote, election will be determined by drawing names from a box. The Secretariat will put the names of the candidates concerned in a box and the first name drawn is the Elected Member.
State Council Representative Nomination
As there were no written nominations for the position of State Council Representative for the period 2015-2017 the Returning Officer invited nominations from the floor of the meeting.
Cr Cullen was nominated by Cr Rathbone. Mayor Bowler supported the nomination.
Cr Cullen accepted the nomination.
There being no further nominations Cr Cullen was elected to the position of State Council Representative for the period 2015-2017.
Election Deputy State Council Representative
As there were no written nominations for the position of Deputy State Council Representative for the period 2015-2017 the Returning Officer invited nominations from the floor of the meeting.
Cr Williams was nominated by Cr Cullen. Cr Rathbone supported the nomination.
Cr Williams accepted the nomination.
There being no further nominations Cr Williams was elected to the position of Deputy State Council Representative for the period 2015-2017.
5.1 Election of Chair and Deputy Chair to the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer/Returning Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 23 November 2015
Attachments: Nil
On Friday 23 October 2015 notice was given that at the GVROC Council Meeting to be held on Friday 27 November 2015 an election would be conducted for the positions of Chair and Deputy Chair of the GVROC. As the GVROC and the Goldfields Esperance Country Zone of WALGA (GECZ) operate as a single entity these elections are also in respect to the GECZ, ie for the positions of President and Deputy President. The term of appointment is for a two year period ending no later than November 2017.
Nominations for the positions of Chair and Deputy Chair will be invited from the floor of the meeting.
The procedure for the conduct of this election is as follows:
§ Prior to the ballot, nominees (should there be more than one nomination) for each position will be extended the opportunity to provide a two minute election bid to delegates;
§ The ballot will conducted as a secret ballot;
§ Each voting delegate to the GVROC will be entitled to cast one (1) vote in the ballot process, with the “first past the post” method of election being used; and
§ The candidate with the greater number of votes will be elected.
In the event of a tie between two candidates a second ballot will be conducted immediately.
Should the second ballot also be a tie, lots will be drawn and the name drawn first will be the successful candidate.
Cr Cullen was nominated by Cr Rathbone for the position of GVROC Chair. Cr Best supported the nomination.
Cr Cullen accepted the nomination.
There being no further nominations Cr Cullen was elected to the position of GVROC Chair for the period 2015-2017.
Mayor Bowler was nominated by Cr Williams for the position of GVROC Deputy Chair. Cr Craig supported the nomination.
Mayor Bowler accepted the nomination.
There being no further nominations Mayor Bowler was elected to the position of GVROC Deputy Chair for the period 2015-2017.
6.1 Appointment of Chair and Deputy Chair to the Goldfields Esperance Regional Collaborative Group
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 23 November 2015
Attachments: Nil
Background:
Clause 3.2 of the Agreement for the Goldfields Esperance Regional Collaborative Group (GERCG) provides direction as to the election of the Chair and Deputy Chair to the GERCG. Clause 3.2 states as follows:
On establishment of the RCG the Chair of the GVROC will be appointed Chair of the RCG and the Deputy Chair of the GVROC will be appointed Deputy Chair of the RCG. Appointment of a future Chair and Deputy Chair of the RCG shall be determined by the Board in accordance with clause 3.4.
Clause 3.4 refers to decisions of the Board, stating as follows:
Board meeting procedures shall be determined by the Board, and decisions shall be made by ordinary majority.
Executive Officer Comment:
With the elections for Chair and Deputy Chair to the GVROC just held it is considered relevant to reaffirm the positions of Chair and Deputy Chair to the GERCG.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Chair of the GVROC be appointed Chair of the GERCG and the Deputy Chair of the GVROC be appointed Deputy Chair of the GERCG.
RESOLUTION Moved: Cr Goldfinch Seconded: Mr Epis
That the Chair of the GVROC be appointed Chair of the GERCG and the Deputy Chair of the GVROC be appointed Deputy Chair of the GERCG.
CARRIED
7.1 Ms Mandi Warry Former Manager Goldfields Tourism Network Association –Update on the Goldfields Exhibits at the 2015 Royal Show (Attachment)
Just after the October GVROC Council Meeting the Executive Officer was contacted by Ms Mandi Warry, Manager of the Goldfields Tourism Network Association (GTNA) to see whether a time could be made available for her to provide an update to Member Councils on the success of the Goldfields Exhibits at the recent Perth Royal Show.
The Executive Officer agreed to make a 15 minutes time available for her to meet with GVROC Council.
As Member Councils may be aware, the Goldfields District Display met with considerable success at the Perth Royal Show gaining first place in the category “District Displays Northern Region”, achieving highest points in the following sections of the competition:
§ Best Arrangement;
§ Best Display of Gemstones;
§ Best Display of Mineral;
§ Best Display of Natural Resources and Environment; and
§ Best Display of Wood Products/Timber.
Since that time Ms Warry has resigned as the Manager GTNA. Mr Neil McGilp is the GTNA’s new Manager. It is the Executive Officer’s intention to make contact with him early in the New Year to extend an invitation for him to meet with GVROC Council to explain the GTNA’s budget request for 2016/2017.
Executive Officer Additional Officer Comment:
A copy of the PowerPoint presentation made available by Mandi Warry forms an attachment to the minutes of the meeting.
8.1 Minutes of a Meeting of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC) Council held Thursday 8 October 2015 (Attachment)
Minutes of the GVROC Council Meeting held Thursday 8 October 2015 have previously been circulated to Member Councils.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Minutes of the GVROC Council Meeting held Thursday 8 October 2015 be confirmed as a true and correct record of proceedings.
EN BLOC
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Hill
That the Minutes of the GVROC Council Meeting held Thursday 8 October 2015 be confirmed as a true and correct record of proceedings.
CARRIED
8.2 Minutes of a Meeting of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC) Council held Friday 6 November 2015 (Attachment)
Minutes of the GVROC Council Meeting held Friday 6 August 2015 have previously been circulated to Member Councils.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Minutes of the GVROC Council Meeting held Friday 6 November 2015 be confirmed as a true and correct record of proceedings.
EN BLOC
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Hill
That the Minutes of the GVROC Council Meeting held Friday 6 November 2015 be confirmed as a true and correct record of proceedings.
CARRIED
8.3 Business Arising from a Meetings of the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (GVROC) - November 2015 Status Report
The Executive Officer will provide a report to the meeting.
Executive Officer Additional Comment:
In working through the business arising from previous meetings the A/CEO Shire of Menzies advised the Shire of Menzies would not be able to participate in the GVROC solar PV project as Horizon Power had allocated the remaining power capacity to another business within the Menzies townsite.
It was agreed that this matter required urgent resolution.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Executive Officer’s report be received.
EN BLOC
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Hill
That:
1. The Executive Officer’s report be received; and
2. The Executive Officer liaise with the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder and the Shire of Menzies on the problems associated with the GVROC solar PV project.
CARRIED
1. Correspondence from Hon Stephen Dawson MLC, Member for Mining and Pastoral Region re the GVROC submission on the review of State electoral region and district boundaries; and
2. On Wednesday 28 October the Minister for Police released a media statement regarding the appointment of Mr Kin Papalia as WA’s first Road Safety Commissioner. Mr Papalia has also been appointed to the position of Chair of the Road Safety Council. A copy of the media statement can be found by following the following link:
RECOMMENDATION:
That the papers detailed in Item 8.4 be noted.
EN BLOC
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Hill
That the papers detailed in Item 8.4 be noted.
CARRIED
9.1 Financial Statements for period ending 31 October 2015 and Accounts for Payment (Attachment)
From Executive Officer
Background:
Presenting the unaudited financial statement for the period 1 July 2015 to 31 October 2015 and the accounts for payment for the period 1 October to 15 November 2015
Financial Statement:
The Executive Officer provides the following comment:
1. Account 501 - Members subscriptions – at the 31 October three Member Councils had not paid their annual subscription. The members have been reminded.
2. Account 502 – Members subscriptions Goldfields District Display – see previous note
3. Accounts 1513 and 1514 – Executive Officer Services – payment for Executive Officer Services and expenses incurred such as travel and accommodation.
4. Account 1555 – Included in this account is expenditure for the farewell dinner for Ron Yuryevich at the GVROC Meeting on 8 October.
5. Account 512 - Project General Contributions - at the 31 October three Member Councils had not paid their Contribution. See Note 1.
6. Account 515 - DLG Grant Asset Management – these funds have been transferred from the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder. During August 2015 the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder transferred the balance of the grant funds to GVROC to administer.
7. Account 1836 – Sponsorship Goldfields District Display – expenditure to assist the preparation of the Royal Show District Display.
8. Account 1848 – DLG Asset Management Business Case – the management of this project has recently transferred to GVROC.
Accounts Paid:
Cheque |
Date |
Payee |
For |
Amount incl GST |
EFT |
131015 |
Up to Date Accounting |
Accounting September 2015 |
475.20 |
EFT |
151015 |
BHW Consulting |
Reimbursement for: § GVROC Meeting Expenses 28 July 2015, § GVROC Meeting Expenses LG Week Meetings, § GVROC Meeting Expenses 4 September 2015, § GVROC Meeting Expenses 8 October 2015, § Farewell Dinner 7 October 2015 |
7,680.39 |
EFT |
101115 |
AMD Accountants |
Audit Costs |
2,739.00 |
EFT |
101115 |
Goldfields Tourism Network |
Attendance on behalf of GVROC at CMCA Rally Albany |
6,990.00 |
EFT |
101115 |
Up to Date Accounting |
Accounting October 2015 |
330.00 |
EFT |
101115 |
ATO |
September 2015 Quarterly BAS |
26,389.00 |
TOTAL $44,603.59 |
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Statement of Financial Position for the period ending 31 October 2015, as attached, be received.
2. That the Accounts Paid for the period 1 October to 15 November 2015 totalling $44,603.59 be approved.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Hill Seconded: Cr Rathbone
1. That the Statement of Financial Position for the period ending 31 October 2015, as attached, be received.
2. That the Accounts Paid for the period 1 October to 15 November 2015 totalling $44,603.59 be approved.
CARRIED
10.1 Financial Statement for the Period ending 31 August 2015
Reporting Officer: Rob Radosevich, A/CEO City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
Yvette Hargreaves, Manager Goldfields Records Storage Facility
Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 16 November 2015
Attachments: Financial Statement for the Goldfields Records Storage Facility for the period ending 31 October 2015
Background:
The A/CEO City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder will provide comment on the financial statement for the Goldfields Records Storage Facility.
The Manager Goldfields Records Storage Facility has provided the following progress report on the Goldfields Records Storage (GRS) for the period ending 31 October 2015:
§ GRS now have 3171 boxes in storage and 83 Clients (an additional 3 new clients have started using the facility since the last report was provided). All have utilised the facility’s destruction service;
§ The past two months has been very quiet, a reflection on the downturn in the region’s economy; and
§ In the quarter ending 31 October 2015 nine boxes of documents were destroyed as were 33 bins of papers and 71 additional boxes were placed in storage for existing clients.
It should be noted that a detailed report on the GRS was provided to GVROC when it met on Thursday 8 October 2015.
Executive Officer Comment:
No further comment required.
Consultation: Nil
Voting Requirement: Simple majority
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Provisional Financial Statement for period ending 31 August 2015 for the Goldfields Records Storage Facility, as attached, be received.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That the Provisional Financial Statement for period ending 31 August 2015 for the Goldfields Records Storage Facility, as attached, be received.
CARRIED
11.1 Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint – Submission from the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils (Attachment)
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 18 November 2016
Attachments: GVROC’s Submission to the Goldfields Esperance Development Commission
Background:
A draft of the Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint was available for public comment until Wednesday 11 November 2015.
In discussing the draft Blueprint with GVROC’s Member Councils at a meeting held Thursday 8 October 2015, the GEDC’s CEO, Shayne Flanagan, provided background to the Blueprint’s preparation. In discussing the work undertaken by the GEDC in drafting the Blueprint he explained the purpose of the Blueprint, once finalised, would be to:
§ Roadmap for social and economic change out to 2050;
§ Shift focus from ‘where we are going’ to ‘where we want to be’;
§ A whole-of-region strategy; and
§ Guide public and private sector investment and effort.
Following its meeting with Shayne Flanagan, the GVROC considered whether it should prepare a submission. GVROC Council resolved as follows:
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Stewart
That GVROC:
1. prepare a submission on the draft Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint; and
2. hold a teleconference meeting on Friday 6 November 2015 commencing at 8.00am for the purpose of reviewing and adopting a submission on the draft Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint.
CARRIED
A draft submission was prepared for consideration by the GVROC Council when it met by teleconference on Friday 6 November 2015. At this time GVROC resolved as follows:
RESOLUTION: Moved: Mr Epis Seconded: Cr Harris
That:
1. Subject to any changes agreed to, the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils endorses the submission prepared on the draft Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint;
2. The Executive Officer finalise and submit the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils’ submission prior to the close of business on Wednesday 11 November 2015; and
3. The submission be presented for ratification at the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils Meeting to be held in Kalgoorlie on Friday 27 November 2015.
CARRIED
Executive Officer Comment:
The Executive Officer finalised the GVROC’s submission lodging it prior to the close of public submissions on Wednesday 11 November 2015.
In an email dated Wednesday 18 November 2015 the Executive Officer was advised that the GVROC’s submission had been received. The email advised that all submissions received will be carefully considered by the GEDC as it finalise the Blueprint for the region. A specific response to the GVROC’s submission will provided in due course.
RECOMMENDATION:
That GVROC endorse the submission prepared on the draft Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint as presented.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Best Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That GVROC endorse the submission prepared on the draft Goldfields Esperance Regional Investment Blueprint as presented.
CARRIED
11.2 Increase in the Emergency Services Levy
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Date: 30 September 2015
Attachments: Nil
Background:
The impact of ongoing increases in the Emergency Services Levy (ESL) on Local Government was considered by the GVROC when it met on Thursday 8 October 2015, at which time it resolved as follows:
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Harris Seconded: Cr Best
That GVROC:
1. note the continuing disproportionate increases in the Emergency Services Levy and request that WALGA develop a strategy to advocate to the State Government for a return to the original intent of the funding arrangements including an increased allocation from consolidated revenue.
2. through its Member Councils prepares a petition to the President and Members of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia seeking to have an inquiry into the disproportionate increases in the Emergency Services Levy and the decline in the proportion of funding from consolidated revenue.
CARRIED
Executive Officer Comment:
WALGA is aware of Local Government’s concerns. As such it is in the process of preparing a discussion paper on the review of the Local Government Capital Grants Scheme and the ESL Administration fee paid to Local Government via the Scheme.
As part of this advocacy strategy, the WALGA President has met with the Minister for Emergency Services; Corrective Services; Small Business; Veterans on this issue. The Minister has announced a review of the Local Government Capital Grants Scheme. This is being led by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services. The Minister supports local government input into the operation of this Scheme and welcomed WALGA’s involvement in the review.
At the time of writing this article the Executive Officer has not progressed the petition as per the resolution taken by GVROC on Thursday 8 October 2015. Given the advocacy work currently being undertaken by WALGA there may be merit in deferring this action until such time as the outcome of WALGA’s efforts is known.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the matter of GVROC preparing a petition through its Member Councils to the President and Members of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia seeking to have an inquiry into the disproportionate increases in the Emergency Services Levy and the decline in the proportion of funding from consolidated revenue lay on the table until such time as the outcome of review of the Local Government Capital Grants Scheme being led by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services is known.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Craig
That:
1. the matter of GVROC preparing a petition through its Member Councils to the President and Members of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia seeking to have an inquiry into the disproportionate increases in the Emergency Services Levy and the decline in the proportion of funding from consolidated revenue lay on the table until such time as the outcome of review of the Local Government Capital Grants Scheme being led by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services is known; and
2. GVROC extend an invitation to the Minister for Emergency Services to GVROC Council Meeting to be held in Esperance on Friday 29 January 2016.
CARRIED
11.3 Southern Rangelands Workshop in Geraldton on Thursday 29 October 2015
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 16 November 2015
1. Attachments: Southern Rangelands BlueSheet
Background:
As Member Councils are aware, GVROC was invited to attend a Southern Rangelands workshop in Geraldton on Thursday 29 October 2015. Following discussion round whether GVROC should attend the workshop it was resolved as follows:
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Cullen
That:
1. Cr Harris be supported by GVROC as its nominated representative to the Southern Rangelands Workshop to be held in Geraldton on Thursday 29 October 2015; and
2. GVROC approve the Executive Officer attending the Workshop should Cr Harris be unable to attend.
CARRIED
Executive Officer Comment:
Councillors Quadrio and Harris attended the workshop on Thursday 29 October. A copy of the action sheet prepared following the workshop forms an attachment to the meeting agenda.
Councillors Quadrio and Harris may wish to make comment on the actions agreed to at the meeting.
The Executive Officer believes that GVROC should participate in future meetings/activities of the Southern Rangelands NRM. If this was agreed to it would necessitate a representative being appointed from within GVROC’s membership (either a Member Council or the Executive Officer being tasked with undertaking the role on the GVROC’s behalf). The appointed representative would need to be available to attend meetings of the group. At this point meetings are scheduled for:
§ Sometime prior to Christmas 2015 (this meeting will see the establishment of a Working Group to establish mechanisms for regional leaders to work collaboratively, thereby creating a more sustainable Southern Rangelands; and
§ A follow up workshop in April 2016 to measure the impact of the work undertaken that point.
Executive Officer Additional Comment:
Councillors Quadrio and Harris provided Member Councils with feedback on the meeting. Points highlighted included:
§ GVROC should continue to be involved in the work being undertaken by the Southern Rangelands NRM;
§ Each of the regions included within the Southern Rangelands NRM’s boundaries – the Gascoyne Development Commission, the Goldfields Esperance Development Commission (GEDC) and the Midwest Development Commission - were invited to attend the workshop. The GEDC did not attend.
§ A working group has been established to work out the next steps in the process to allow for the revitalisation of the pastoral industry across the region;
§ It was recognised that the working group’s membership need to include pastoralists and other industry representatives; and
§ Discussions were held around the need for diversification and the potential for funding from the State Government’s “Water for Food Program”.
Consultation: Nil
Voting Requirement: Simple majority
The matter is presented for consideration by Member Councils.
RECOMMENDATION:
That:
1. GVROC continue its association with the Southern Rangelands NRM; and
2. _________ be appointed as the GVROC’s representative to the Southern Rangelands NRM.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Harris Seconded: Cr Williams
That:
1. GVROC continue its association with the Southern Rangelands NRM; and
2. Cr Quadrio be appointed as the GVROC’s representative to the Southern Rangelands NRM.
CARRIED
11.4 GVROC Meeting with the Director General Department of Mines and Petroleum, Mr Richard Sellers on Thursday 8 October 2015
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 16 October 2015
Attachments: Correspondence from Mr Tony Bullen, Acting Executive Director Mineral Titles Division, Department of Mines and Petroleum
Background:
In meeting with Member Councils on Thursday 8 October 2015, Mr Richard Sellers, Director General Department of Mines and Petroleum, undertook to provide further information on a number of issues raised during the meeting. A copy of correspondence prepared providing response to some of the matters raised during the meeting form an attachment to the meeting agenda.
Executive Officer Comment:
The Executive Officer seeks direction as to whether any further action resulting from the receipt of this correspondence is required.
This direction will assist in providing topics for discussion with representatives from the Department of Mines and Petroleum at the GVROC Meeting to be held in Esperance on Friday 29 January 2016 (In the discussion that followed GVROC’s Meeting with the Directors General from the Department of Planning and the Department of Mines and Petroleum it was agreed that representatives of the Department of Mines and Petroleum and Department of Planning be invited to attend the January and August meetings of GVROC.
Executive Officer Additional Comment:
Member Councils put forward the following issues for discussion with representatives from the Department of Planning and Department of Mines and Petroleum at the GVROC Council Meeting scheduled for Friday 29 January 2016:
§ The increasing environmental constraints being placed upon prospectors when lodging applications to mine;
§ The return of rates by a local government when a mining lease is surrendered; and
§ The urgent need for “town sterilisation” so towns can be developed – without this the future development of the Coolgardie and Ravensthorpe townsites cannot take place;
There was also some discussion around the future of work that had been undertaken by WALGA’s Mining Policy Forum as the future of all policy forums was being considered.
Consultation: Nil
Voting Requirement: Simple majority
The matter is presented for consideration by Member Councils.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Mayor Bowler Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That the Minister for Mines be invited to the GVROC Council Meeting to be held in Esperance on Friday 29 January 2016.
CARRIED
11.5 GERCG Implementation (Asset Management) Project
Reporting Officer: Rob Radosevich, A/CEO City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
John O’Sullivan, Manager Assets and Procurement, City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Date: 9 November 2015
Attachments: National Asset Framework Assessment Report 2015
Background:
John O’Sullivan, the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder’s Manager Assets and Procurement, will provide a report on the GERCG’s asset management project, specifically the preparation of the National Asset Framework Assessment Report 2015, a copy of which forms an attachment to the meeting agenda.
The report contains a proposal for GVROC’s Member Councils to obtain regional licensing and training for NAMs Plus 3. The proposal with associated costings forms Appendix B of the report.
He will also briefly speak about the study he is looking to commence in early 2016 of GVROC’s asset renewal gaps based on the latest available valuations.
Executive Officer Comment:
GVROC Council will need to consider adoption of the proposal. Adoption of such a proposal will allow continued implementation of the findings of the earlier work undertaken by the GERCG with funding made available to it by the State Government. Adoption of the proposal will allow continued implementation of the findings of the earlier work undertaken by the GERCG with funding made available to it by the State Government.
Consultation: Nil
Voting Requirement: Simple majority
RECOMMENDATION:
That GVROC:
1. Endorse the National Asset Framework Assessment Report 2015 as prepared by the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder’s Manager Assets and Procurement, including the proposal for regional Licensing and training for NAMs Plus 3; and
2. Request that all Member Councils allocate funding in their 2016/2-2017 budgets for participation in the regional Licensing and training for NAMs Plus 3.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Hill Seconded: Cr Williams
That GVROC:
1. Endorse the National Asset Framework Assessment Report 2015 as prepared by the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder’s Manager Assets and Procurement, including the proposal for regional Licensing and training for NAMs Plus 3; and
2. Request that all Member Councils allocate funding in their 2016/2-2017 budgets for participation in the regional Licensing and training for NAMs Plus 3.
CARRIED
Ms Mandi Warry entered the meeting at 11.00am
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Hill Seconded: Mr Epis
That the meeting adjourn for morning tea.
CARRIED
The meeting adjourned at 11.02am
The meeting resumed at 11.22am
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Hill Seconded: Mr Epis
That the meeting resume.
CARRIED
At this point the meeting considered Agenda Item 7.1 but for the purposes of the minutes the item is considered in order of the agenda.
Mandi Warry left the meeting at 11.02am
11.6 Training for Country Councillors - Phase 3
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 20 October 2016
Attachments: Nil
Background:
As Member Councils are aware, WALGA and the Department of Local Government and Communities are working in partnership to provide high level training opportunities for Country Local Government councillors. Using WALGA’s Diploma of Local Government (Elected Member) as its framework, a 4 day program is being delivered in regional locations across Western Australia. Phase 3 of this training will take place during the first half of 2016.
The following Training for Country Councillors will be held in Esperance and Kalgoorlie:
Title |
Date |
Serving on Council (Esperance) |
27 January 2016 |
Meeting Procedures and Debating (Esperance) |
28 January 2016 |
Land Use Planning (Kalgoorlie) |
18 February 2016 |
Strategy and Managing Risk (Kalgoorlie) |
19 February |
Each course runs from 9.00am through until 4.30pm and the cost in attending is $50 (GST exempt) per participant per course.
Executive Officer Comment:
The training is being offered at heavily subsidised prices and represents an excellent opportunity for Councillors, both newly elected and those looking to build their skills level.
Executive Officer Additional Comment:
Cr Rathbone also raised the matter of training for Mayors/Presidents and their deputies to be held in Perth on Monday 7 December, enquiring whether it would be possible to have this training offered in Esperance in late January next year when other training is also scheduled.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Member Councils be encouraged to participate in the training opportunities being offered by WALGA and the Department of Local Government and Communities during the first half of 2016.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Hill Seconded: Cr Best
That:
1. Member Councils be encouraged to participate in the training opportunities being offered by WALGA and the Department of Local Government and Communities during the first half of 2016;
2. The Executive Officer enquire whether the training session for Mayors/Presidents and their deputies could also be offered to Member Councils as part of the training scheduled to be held on Esperance in late January 2016.
CARRIED
11.7 Elected Members Training – Local Government Finance
Reporting Officer: Ian Fitzgerald, CEO Shire of Ravensthorpe
Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Date: 18 November 2015
Attachments: Nil
Background:
The Shire of Ravensthorpe recently received correspondence from accounting firm Moore Stephens regarding new training offering specifically developed for elected members on the topic of Local Government finance. A copy of the email is provided below for Member Councils information.
From: Moore
Stephens [mailto:pbobek=moorestephens.com.au@mail187.atl81.rsgsv.net] On
Behalf Of Moore Stephens
Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2015 9:04 AM
To: Ian Fitzgerald
Subject: Elected members training- Local Government Finance
|
Executive Officer Comment:
Ian Fitzgerald, CEO, Shire of Ravensthorpe believes this course may have value for GVROC’s membership and was looking to have the matter discussed to determine whether there was sufficient interest to have a course delivered within the region.
The matter is presented for consideration by Member Councils.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Dunlop Seconded: Cr Craig
That the Executive Officer investigate the cost to conduct training similar to that being promoted by Moore Stephens across three locations within GVROC.
CARRIED
11.8 Census of Local Government Councillors (Attachment)
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Date: 18 November 2015
Attachments: Census of WA Local Government Councillors Information
Background:
The University of WA and WALGA are partnering in the conduct of an Elected Member Census project which is being funded by the Department of Local Government and Communities.
A research team including Professor Fiona Haslam McKenzie and Dr Paul Maginn from the Centre for Regional Development at the University of Western Australia (UWA) is planning to undertake a Census of WA Local Government Councillors early in 2016 and wishes to raise an awareness of the census and how Local Government CEOs can assist in the process.
Executive Officer Comment:
UWA has conducted a pilot census and the response was that to be effective the census must be delivered via a council meeting or at a council pre-meeting to ensure a maximum response rate. To that end, UWA are raising the awareness through this agenda item and requesting that the CEOs administer the census.
UWA has requested that:
§ the CEO put the census on a meeting agenda;
§ administer (distribute) the census (short survey which will take no more than 10 minutes to complete) and the accompanying information sheet to councillors; and
§ collect the completed surveys and mail them back to UWA in a Reply Paid Envelope.
More detailed information on the Census forms an attachment to the meeting agenda.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report be noted and Member Councils be encouraged to assist in the conduct of the Census of WA Local Government Councillors.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That the report be noted and Member Councils be encouraged to assist in the conduct of the Census of WA Local Government Councillors.
CARRIED
11.9 Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Date: 19 November 2015
Attachments: Letter to WALGA from Moharich and More
Background:
As Member Councils will be aware, the recently gazetted Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 are a cause for concern for some local governments, particularly as they relate to where second hand dwellings can be being relocated to.
By way of additional background the following email was circulated to a number of local governments:
Attention all local governments –
I had a meeting with officers from the Department of Planning this morning and have been advised that:
1. The Draft Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations will remove any planning controls over the use of transportable buildings as single houses. This essentially means that owners who want to put a second hand transportable in any of your towns only have to apply for a Building Permit – the BCA only deals with structural issues and therefore there is no requirement for any upgrading, bonds, or assessment of impact of amenity.
2. The Draft Regulations will be finalised next Monday/ Tuesday. If you are opposed to this change I urge you to sign the attached petition (and get as many signatures as possible) and return it to me by Friday 21 August 2015 12.30pm so I can collate objections and lodge it with the Ministers Office.
3. The Department of Planning has advised me that “Transportable dwellings are now considered a dwelling and considered a ‘single house’ which does not require planning approval if in compliance with the R Codes. Any issues with structure/health aspects of the building will be covered through compliance with those acts e.g. Building Act and Health Act. “
4. The ‘current’ version of the Draft Regulations is not publicly available and includes a lot of changes that have not formed part of advertising.
We work for a number of regional Shires and the use of poor quality second hand transportable as dwellings in townsites is a major issue. Please join me and try and make a difference before it is too late. Even if we just get CEO and planners signatures due to the short time frame it all helps.
There are a lot of issues with the New Regulations and this is only one of them, but I feel it is an important one as uncontrolled second hand houses have potential to have a negative impact on our towns.
Kind Regards
Liz Bushby
Gray & Lewis Land Use Planners
Executive Officer Comment:
Vanessa Jackson, Policy Manager, Planning and Improvement, WALGA has been working to address the concerns raised by a number of local governments and expressed in the above email from Liz Bushby.
WALGA consulted with Member Councils on the proposed regulations in December 2014 and January 2015 and the submission was endorsed by WALGA State Council in March 2015. Unfortunately, as is the protocol around draft legislation, it is confidential and as such WALGA could not consult with Member Councils on the various versions of the regulations before they were published.
In late August 2015 WALGA raised the concerns being expressed by Member Councils with the Department of Planning. Whilst there were some interim responses from the Department of Planning no substantive response was received by the time WALGA President met with the Minister for Planning on Thursday 29 October 2015.
In addition to working with the Department of Planning on this matter, WALGA has also obtained legal advice (a copy of which forms an attachment to the meeting agenda). The advice received indicates that the concerns being expressed by local government were “real” and if anything the advice suggested the issue was wider than just transportable houses.
In early November WALGA met with representatives of the Department of Planning to discuss the regulations and the meeting was positive in that it would seem that the regulations were not intended to have the apparent consequences that have been identified. The discussions are ongoing and hopefully there will be a resolution in the not too distant future.
The role that WALGA and in particular Vanessa Jackson has played in pursuing the interest of concerned Member Councils is to be commended and it is disappointing that the Department of Planning failed to address the sector’s concerns in a timely manner.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the report be noted with WALGA and Vanessa Jackson, Policy Manager, Planning and Improvement being complimented on their approach to addressing this matter.
2. The Zone Executive Officer continue to monitor the progress of this issue.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Rathbone Seconded: Cr Harris
1. That the report be noted with WALGA and Vanessa Jackson, Policy Manager, Planning and Improvement being complimented on their approach to addressing this matter.
2. GVROC write to the Minister for Planning seeking clarification on the siting of transportable homes as per the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
CARRIED
11.10 Meeting with the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal
Reporting Officer: Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Date: 17 November 2015
Attachments: Nil
Background:
As Member Councils will be aware, the Salaries and Allowance Tribunal (SAT) have responsibility for establishing the allowances for elected members and the salaries of CEOs working in Local Government.
During the early part of 2016 SAT is looking to undertake a program of travel throughout the state to meet with regional and remote local governments so that they stay informed on the issues that affect them. This will assist SAT as it looks to review the allowances and salaries for both elected members and CEOs. As such, it has requested a meeting with GVROC as part of this review program.
Executive Officer Comment:
The Executive Officer has extended an invitation to members of the Salaries and Allowance Tribunal to meet with GVROC on Friday 29 January 2016 when GVROC meets in Esperance.
Statutory Implications: Nil
Consultation: Nil
Voting Requirement: Simple Majority
RECOMMENDATION:
That the invitation to members of the Salaries and Allowance Tribunal to meet with GVROC on Friday 29 January 2016 be noted.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Harris
That the invitation to members of the Salaries and Allowance Tribunal to meet with GVROC on Friday 29 January 2016 be noted.
CARRIED
11.11 Proposed Re-establishment of the WA Police Livestock Squad
Reporting Officer: Mr Steve Deckert, CEO, Shire of Laverton
Mr Jim Epis, CEO Shire of Leonora
Helen Westcott, Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: No interest to disclose
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Date: 12 November 2015
Attachments: Correspondence
from the Murchison Country Zone re the
Re-establishment of the WA Police Livestock Squad
Background:
The Murchison Country Zone has written to all pastoral and agricultural local governments seeking their support as they work to have the Police Livestock Squad reformed.
Executive Officer Comment:
The Police Livestock Squad was established to protect rural properties and farms across the state to prevent livestock theft. The Squad was disbanded in 2008 with the responsivity transferred to the general police staff operating within a region. The call to have the Squad reformed arises from growing concern about stock theft in the northern Goldfields.
The Shires of Laverton and Leonora have requested the matter be listed for discussion, believing that support for the proposal should be offered.
Statutory Implications: Nil
Consultation: Nil
Voting Requirement: Simple Majority
RECOMMENDATION:
That GVROC offer its support to the Murchison Country Zone in its efforts to have the Police Livestock Squad established.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Williams Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That the GVROC Technical Officers Working Group prepare a report for consideration at a future meeting of the GVROC Council on:
1. the benefits of having the Police Livestock Squad reformed as well as other strategies that will assist in reducing stock theft across the Goldfields Esperance region; and
2. the training of all policer officers in order that they have a basic understanding of how to deal with livestock.
CARRIED
Zone delegates to consider the Matters for Decision contained in the WA Local Government Association State Council Agenda and put forward resolutions to Zone Representatives on State Council
12.1 State Councillor / Goldfields Esperance Zone President’s Report
Nil report
12.2 WALGA Status Report (Attachment)
From Executive Officer
BACKGROUND:
Presenting the Status Report for November 2015 which contains WALGA’s responses to the resolutions of previous Meetings
ZONE COMMENT:
This is an opportunity for Member Councils to consider the response from WALGA in respect to the matters that were submitted at the previous Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils notes the WALGA Status Report.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Seconded:
12.3 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Matters for Decision
From Executive Officer
Background:
WALGA State Council meets five times each year and as part of the consultation process with Member Councils circulates the State Council Agenda for input through the Zone structure.
The Zone is able to provide comment or submit an alternate recommendation that is then presented to the State Council for consideration.
5.1 Local Government Rating (05-034-02-0015 TL)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA:
1. Endorse the attached “Rate Capping: Policy Statement” expressing opposition to rate capping;
2. Advocate for a review of the rate billing process with the intention of establishing consistency with the State Government’s water rates billing process; and,
3. Advocate to the Minister for Local Government to:
a. Amend the Local Government Act to clarify that Independent Living Units should only be exempt from rates where they qualify under the Commonwealth Aged Care Act 1997; and,
b. Either
i. Amend the charitable organisations section of the Local Government Act 1995 to eliminate exemptions for commercial (non-charitable) business activities of charitable organisations; or,
ii Establish a compensatory fund for Local Governments, similar to the pensioner discount provisions, if the State Government believes charitable organisations should remain exempt from payment of Local Government rates.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.2 Policy Options to Increase Elected Member Training (05-034-02-0015 TL)
WALGA Recommendation
That:
1. WALGA continue to promote Elected Member training and development opportunities;
2. The secretariat develop:
a. A best practice Council Induction Guide; and
b. A template Elected Member Training and Development Policy.
3. WALGA adopts a formal policy position that opposes legislative change that:
a. Requires candidates to undertake training prior to nominating for election; or,
b. Incentivises Elected Member training through the fees and allowances framework; or,
c. Mandates Elected Member training.
4. Notwithstanding WALGA’s opposition to mandatory Elected Member training, if such a regime becomes inevitable, WALGA seek to ensure that it;
a. Only applies to first time Elected Members;
b. Utilises the Elected Member Skill Set as the appropriate content for mandatory training;
c. Applies appropriate Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL);
d. Requires training to be completed within the first 12 months of office; and
e. Applies a penalty for non-compliance of a reduction in fees and allowances payable.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC does not a formal position on training options at this point. Member Councils might wish to consider the matter and develop a position.
5.3 State Budget Submission 2016-17 (05-088-03-0001 PS)
WALGA Recommendation
That the Association’s State Budget Submission 2016-17 be endorsed.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.4 Submission to the Select Committee into the Scrutiny of Government Budget Measures on Infrastructure Financing (05-088-03-0001 PS)
WALGA Recommendation
That the Association’s submission to the Select Committee into the Scrutiny of Government Budget Measures on Infrastructure Financing be endorsed.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.5 Infrastructure WA Advisory Group (05-001-03-0018 ID)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA:
1. Maintain observer status with the Infrastructure WA Advisory Group provided that there is no direct financial cost.
2. Urge the State Government to lead a consultative, transparent process to develop a coherent and comprehensive infrastructure plan for Western Australia.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.6 West Australian State CCTV Strategy Consultation (05-019-03-0009 JH)
WALGA Recommendation
That the proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Minister for Police and WALGA (as a participant on behalf of Local Governments) “for the provision of a coordinated State CCTV network that allows data sharing between owners of CCTV cameras facing public areas to enhance the safety and security of the Western Australian community” be endorsed.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support WALGA Recommendation.
Note: The Executive Officer was approached by officers working on the State CCTV Strategy to see whether there would be a suitable time before the end of the year to meet with Member Councils to discuss the grants to be made available as the State Government roles out its CCTV Strategy. Due to timing constraints this meeting was not possible but Member Councils are reminded that the grant applications for this funding can be made. Details regarding the grants were made in a ministerial media release on Sunday 8 November 2015.
Councils can apply for funding by visiting http://www.police.wa.gov.au/cctv.
5.7 Interim Submission – Building Commission’s Discussion Paper about ‘Instant Start’ (05-015-01-0003 VJ)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA:
1. Strongly oppose the ‘Instant Start’ concept as it is not based on any policy foundation and has inherent risks and potential liability for Local Government; and
2. Endorse the interim submission to the Building Commission on the Discussion Paper ‘Instant Start’ that sets out WALGA’s concerns.
ZONE COMMENT:
The following is an extract from WALGA’s Interim Submission – Building Commission’s Discussion Paper about ‘Instant Start which “sums up” the inherent problems with the process being proposed:
WALGA Final comments
Clearly the State Government and the Building Commission lacks understanding of the role of local government. The state government seems to be making decisions to be popular among some without any thought of the detrimental impact the decision has on local government (or residents). This Instant Start decision is a perfect example.
Further, given the State Governments recent announcement of ‘Red Tape’ reduction, it is incredible that the ‘Instant Start’ process is still being pursued, as a significant amount of additional red tape, processing requirements, forms, and enforcement issues will be imposed on the Building Commission and Local Government in order to ‘help’ save 10 days for the Building Industry.
It is worrying that a significant change to the Building Application process is being pursued without any data to back it up, and even though the Building Commission’s role is to monitor and review the operation of the Building Act through Section 86 of the Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011. The Association is currently compiling a one year data snapshot of the Building Permit process, to clearly show the efficient processing of Building Permits by the local government sector and will provide this information once completed.
As there is a high focus of these legislative changes being proposed to assist in the ‘housing affordability’ debate, it is suggested that the entire housing delivery process be investigated, including the scheduling arrangements of the Building Industry.
It would be interesting to clearly outline the whole of development costs, which would show that the holding costs imposed by the local government assessment system (the 10 days) is insignificant compared to the delays home owners face in the scheduling of supplies and trades over the 12 – 18 month construction schedule.
If this fatally flawed system is pursued, WALGA will be recommending that all local governments should advise landowners that when they have a problem with the builder and process because of ‘Instant Start’ that they direct their complaint to the Building Commission and the Minister, not the local government.
GVROC strongly supports the WALGA Recommendation.
5.8 Interim Submission to WA Planning Commission – Draft Liveable Neighbourhoods (05-047-02-0007 VJ)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA endorse the interim submission to the WA Planning Commission on the draft Liveable Neighbourhoods document.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.9 Revised Draft State Planning Policy 3.7: Planning in Bushfire-Prone Areas (05-024-02-0056 CG)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA:
1. note the feedback provided by the Association to the WA Planning Commission concerning the revised draft SPP3.7 Planning in Bushfire-Prone Areas.
2. Request that the Minister for Planning and the WA Planning Commission release the revised draft document for public consultation.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.10 Interim Submission to the WA Planning Commission: Peel Region Scheme Floodplain Management Policy (05-036-03-0028 CG)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA endorse the interim submission to the WA Planning Commission regarding the draft Peel Region Scheme Floodplain Management Policy.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.11 Interim Submission on the Heritage Bill 2015 (05-036-03-022 NH)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA endorses the interim submission to the Heritage Bill 2015.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
5.12 Interim Submission on the Emissions Reduction Fund Safeguard Mechanism (05-028-03-0016 LS)
WALGA Recommendation
That WALGA endorse the interim submission to the Commonwealth Department of the Environment relating to the Emissions Reduction Fund Safeguard Mechanism.
ZONE COMMENT:
GVROC support the WALGA Recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils endorses all recommendations being matters contained in the WALGA State Council Agenda other than those recommendations separately considered.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Hill Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils endorses all recommendations being matters contained in the WALGA State Council Agenda other than those recommendations separately considered.
CARRIED
12.4 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Matters for Noting/Information
6.1 Report Municipal Waste Advisory Council (MWAC) (01-006-03-0008 RNB)
6.2 Update on Energy Efficient Street Lighting (05 028 04-0006 LS)
6.3 Successful Advocacy for Faster Native Vegetation Clearing Permit Processing Times (05-095-03-0001 JB)
6.4 Local Government Audits (05-068-02-0001 WFS)
Given the pending transfer of auditing responsibilities to the Office of the Auditor General Member Councils may wish to further discuss this matter.
6.5 City of Perth Bill (05-034-01-0015 TL)
The Executive Officer in reading the City of Perth Bill and the associated Hansard of parliamentary debate on the WA Parliament website noticed that the Minister for Local Government has introduced two further amendments to the Bill that will amend the Local Government Act 1995 by amending s5.82, s5.83 and inserting two new sections 5.89A and 5.89B.
The effect of the proposed changes is to require gift and travel disclosures to be declared within 10 days of receiving them and also make them available for inspection on the website of local governments.
The Bill will now be considered by the Legislative Council.
6.6 Local Laws and the Parliamentary Process (05-034-01-0007 JMc)
6.7 Parliamentary Committee Review, Development Assessment Panels (05-047-01-0016 CG)
12.5 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Organisational Reports (Attachments)
7.1 Key Activity Reports
7.1.1 Report on Key Activities, Environment and Waste Unit (01-006-03-0017 MJB)
The following is an extract from the activity report as it relates to biosecurity:
Biosecurity Policy
The Association is undergoing an in-depth assessment of biosecurity policy in response to members’ concerns raised at the AGM. As stage one of this work, the Association is currently drafting a discussion paper that will outline all relevant background information and pose possible management options. This document will be circulated in the early New Year for Local Government comment. WALGA will also deliver five biosecurity forums around the south west land division in February 2016, with the Department of Agriculture and Food staff presenting and answering questions at these sessions. The workshops are being planned for Esperance, Merredin, Bridgetown, Geraldton and Perth.
Note: With the importance of biosecurity becoming more widely known Member Councils should look to support the workshop being planned for Esperance.
A copy of the recently released Biosecurity Needs Assessment Report and related presentation form attachments to the meeting agenda for the interest of Member Councils. The Needs Assessment Report was developed through surveys with four key stakeholder groups including local government. Within many comments/feedback detailed is the suggestion that local government become responsible for community coordination and there is a reference to local government being required to prepare biosecurity frameworks (suggestion 6) and other plans. Other comments include:
§ Local government becoming responsible for the setting up of biosecurity groups; and
§ Involvement of local government rangers in the control of pest weeds and plants.
7.1.2 Report on Key Activities, Governance and Organisational Services (01-006-03-0007 TB)
7.1.3 Report on Key Activities, Infrastructure (05-001-02-0003 ID)
7.1.4 Report on Key Activities, Planning and Community Development (01-006-03-0014 AH)
12.6 Review of WALGA State Council Agenda - Policy Forum Reports
7.2 Policy Forum Reports
7.2.1 Mining Community Policy Forum
7.2.2 Container Deposit Legislation Policy Forum
7.2.3 Metropolitan Mayors Policy Forum
7.2.4 Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act (2007) Review Policy Forum
7.2.5 Freight Policy Forum
12.7 WALGA President’s Report (Attachment)
Presenting the WALGA President’s Report
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Goldfields Voluntary Organisation of Councils notes the following reports contained in the WALGA State Council Agenda:
§ Matters for Noting/Information;
§ Organisational reports;
§ Policy Forum reports; and
§ WALGA President’s Report.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Best Seconded: Cr Rathbone
That the Goldfields Voluntary Organisation of Councils notes the following reports contained in the WALGA State Council Agenda:
§ Matters for Noting/Information;
§ Organisational reports;
§ Policy Forum reports; and
§ WALGA President’s Report.
CARRIED
13.1 Department of Local Government and Communities
Mr Gary Angel, Principal Strategy Officer, Strategy, Research and Initiatives, Department of Local Government and Communities
14.1 Traineeships
Cr Best enquired whether any Member Councils were offering traineeships.
The City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder advised that it currently offered 13 traineeships annually.
The Mayor put forward the potential for a regionally based traineeship program, whereby trainees would get experience across the region and not just in one local government.
RESOLUTION: Moved: Cr Best Seconded: Cr Harris
That the Executive Officer prepare a report on the potential for a regionally focussed local government traineeship program for consideration at the GVROC Council meeting to be held on Esperance on Friday 29 January 2016.
CARRIED
15. FUTURE MEETINGS/FUNCTIONS
Friday 29 January 2016 – an in-person meeting of the GVROC Council in Esperance
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 12.49pm
DECLARATION
These minutes were confirmed by the Goldfields Voluntary Regional Organisation of Councils at the meeting held on 29 January 2016
Signed _______________________________
Person presiding at the meeting at which these minutes were confirmed
Minutes of the Audit Committee
Author/s |
Helen Hall |
Executive Assistant |
Authorisor/s |
Matthew Scott |
Chief Executive Officer |
File Ref: D15/31908
That the recommendations of the Audit Committee meeting held on 14 December 2015 be received. Voting Requirement Simple Majority
|
Audit Committee: Minutes
14 December 2015 Page Minutes 187
Shire of Esperance
Audit Committee
Monday 14 December 2015
MINUTES
DISCLAIMER
No responsibility whatsoever is implied or accepted by the Shire of Esperance for any act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council or Committee meetings. The Shire of Esperance disclaims any liability for any loss whatsoever and howsoever caused arising out of reliance by any person or legal entity on any such act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council or Committee meetings. Any person or legal entity who acts or fails to act in reliance upon any statement, act or omission made in a Council or Committee meeting does so at that person’s or legal entity’s own risk.
In particular and without derogating in any way from the broad disclaimer above, in any discussion regarding any planning application or application for a licence, any statement or intimation of approval made by a member or officer of the Shire of Esperance during the course of any meeting is not intended to be and is not to be taken as notice of approval from the Shire of Esperance. The Shire of Esperance warns that anyone who has any application lodged with the Shire of Esperance must obtain and should only rely on written confirmation of the outcome of the application, and any conditions attaching to the decision made by the Shire of Esperance in respect of the application.
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Council is committed to a code of conduct and all decisions are based on an honest assessment of the issue, ethical decision-making and personal integrity. Councillors and staff adhere to the statutory requirements to declare financial, proximity and impartiality interests and once declared follow the legislation as required.
ATTACHMENTS
Please be advised that in order to save printing and paper costs, all attachments referenced in this paper are available in the original Agenda document for this meeting.
Table of Contents / Index
ITEM
NO. ITEM HEADING PAGE
1. OFFICIAL OPENING 4
2. ATTENDANCE
3. APOLOGIES & NOTIFICATION OF GRANTED LEAVE OF ABSENCE
4. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
5. Deputations, Presentations, Inspections, Petitions
Nil
6. DECLARATION OF MEMBERS INTERESTS
6.1 Declarations of Financial Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60a
6.2 Declarations of Proximity Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60b
6.3 Declarations of Impartiality Interests – Admin Regulations Section 34c
7. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
8. New Business of an Urgent Nature
Nil
9. Matters Requiring a Determination of Committee
9.1 Appointment of Independent Audit Committee Member
10. Matters behind Closed Doors
10.1 PROVISION OF AUDIT SERVICES
11. CLOSURE
Audit Committee: Minutes
14 December 2015 Page Minutes 190
SHIRE OF ESPERANCE
MINUTES
Audit
Committee Meeting HELD IN Council Meeting Room ON
14 December 2015
COMMENCING AT 4pm
1. OFFICIAL OPENING
The Presiding Member declared the meeting open at 4.15pm.
2. ATTENDANCE
Members
Cr V Brown Shire President Rural Ward
Cr P Griffiths Town Ward
Cr B Parker Rural Ward
Cr B Stewart, JP Town Ward
Shire Officers
Mr W M (Matthew) Scott Chief Executive Officer
Mr S Burge Director Corporate Resources
Mrs B O’Callaghan Manager Financial Services
Members of the Public & Press
3. APOLOGIES & NOTIFICATION OF GRANTED LEAVE OF ABSENCE
4. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Nil Questions
5. Deputations, Presentations, Inspections, Petitions
Nil
6. DECLARATION OF MEMBERS INTERESTS
6.1 Declarations of Financial Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60a
Nil
6.2 Declarations of Proximity Interests – Local Government Act Section 5.60b
Nil
6.3 Declarations of Impartiality Interests – Admin Regulations Section 34c
Nil
7. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
|
Seconded: Cr Parker
AU1215-043 F4 - A0 That the Minutes of the Audit Committee Meeting of the 10 November 2015 be confirmed as a true and correct record.
|
|
8. New Business of an Urgent Nature
Nil
9. Matters Requiring a Determination of Committee
Seconded: Cr Parker
AU1215-044
Officer’s Recommendation That the Audit Committee accepts that the position of independent committee member remains vacant during the current term of the Audit Committee until the committee makes a decision on any applications received. F4 - A0 |
10. Matters behind Closed Doors
Seconded: Cr Parker
AU1215-045 That the meeting proceed behind closed doors in accordance with section 5.23(2) of the Local Government Act 1995, to consider the following items, which are considered confidential for the reasons indicated. 10.1 PROVISION OF AUDIT SERVICES This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
F4 - A0
|
Seconded: Cr Parker
AU1215-046 Officer’s Recommendation That the Audit Committee recommends to Council to accept Moore Stephens quote for Audit Services for five years commencing 1 July 2015. F3 – A1 (Against Cr Griffiths)
|
Seconded: Cr Parker
AU1215-047 That the meeting come from behind closed doors.
F4 - A0
|
11. CLOSURE
The Presiding Member declared the meeting closed at 4.45pm.
These Minutes were confirmed at a meeting held on _____________________
Signed ________________________________________
Presiding Member at the meeting at which the Minutes were confirmed.
Dated_____________________
27 January 2016 Page 194
14. Motions of which Notice has been Given
15. MEMBERS QUESTIONS WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE
16. URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY DECISION
17. MATTERS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS
Officer’s Comment:
It is recommended that the meeting is behind closed doors for the following items, in accordance with section 5.23(2) of the Local Government Act 1995.
Tender 09-15 Construction of Depot Administration Building
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
RFQ 13-15 Replacement of a Grader
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
RFQ 17-15 Replacement of a Prime Mover
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
RFQ 18-15 Replacement of an End Tipper
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
RFQ 20-15 Replacement of a Light Truck
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
RFQ 29-15 Replacement of a Low Loader
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
Sale of Vacant Land - 6 Adelaide Close
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local government (Section 5.23(2)(e)(ii)).
Proposed Lease - Lot 47 Shark Lake Road Monjingup - Shark Lake Industrial Park
Confidential Item
This report is considered confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, as it relates to a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting (Section 5.23(2)(c)).
18. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
19. CLOSURE