Attachments of Ordinary Council

Item: 12.1.1

Attachment a.: Schedule of Submissions

SCHEDULE OF SUBMISSIONS – LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME NO. 24

Submission #

Submittors Details

Description of Affected Property

Submission Comments

Planning Services Comments

John and Patricia McPharlin

PO Box 2388

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lots 184 – 187 Burton Road, Castletown

Request that the commercial zoning be amended to ‘Residential’ R40.

Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Lots 184 – 187 Burton Road, Castletown to ‘Residential’ with a density of R40

Department of Environmental Regulation

Locked Bag 33

Cloisters Square

PERTH WA 6000

N/A

No comment on the proposed Local Planning Scheme. Where required, the Department of Environment Regulation will provide input at subsequent stages of planning in reference to the Department’s regulatory responsibilities under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 or Contaminated Sites Act 2003.

Noted

Department of Aboriginal Affairs

Ground Floor

151 Royal Street

EAST PERTH WA 6004

N/A

(i) Not able to provide specific comment on particular areas in relation to Aboriginal Heritage Places.

(ii) There are currently one hundred and thirty five registered heritage places listed within the Shire's LGA as well as two hundred and one other heritage places also listed within the LGA on the Register of Aboriginal Places and Objects as well as the DAA Aboriginal Heritage Database.

(iii) Suggests that if the Shire have not already done so that they contact the Native Title Claimant groups for their input regarding the proposed Scheme and whether there will be any impact to the heritage places.

(iv) Recommends that for any future works that the Shire of Esperance refer to the State's Aboriginal Heritage Due Diligence Guidelines (Guidelines).

(i) Noted

(ii) Noted

(iii) Noted

(iv) Noted

Telstra

Locked Bag 2525

PERTH WA 6001

N/A

No Objection

Noted

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

GPO Box 2005

CANBERRA ACT 2601

N/A

(i) Page 79 of 117, sub-para (e)(iii) states "The local government shall not approve any development that infringes upon the Esperance Airport Obstacle Limitation Surfaces (OLS)." CASA allows, with condition, some developments to infringe the OLS. However there is no mention of PANS-OPS surfaces, which have far less scope for permissible infringements.

(ii) Page 80, sub-para (ii) - omits 'Safety' in "Civil Aviation [Safety] Authority.

(iii) There is no consideration in the planning document of the National Airports Safeguarding Framework: the WA Government did not sign the agreement, but ‘supports the framework and will look to implement over time’ through the WA Dept of Planning and individual local governments.

(i) Uphold

Insert Schedule 2 - 8.(c)(iii) Stating “within SCA 8C planning approval is required for all development (except Agriculture – Extensive)”

Amend Schedule 2 - 8.(e)(iv)vi by deleting the word “and”

Amend Schedule 2 - 8.(e)(iv)vii by renumbering to Schedule 2 - 8.(e)(iv)viii

Insert Schedule 2 - 8.(e)(iv)vii Stating “the Esperance Airport PANS-OPS protection surface; and”

Amend the Scheme Map by inserting SCA 8C a 37.04km by 2km rectangle centred on the main runway at an angle of 290 degrees.

(ii) Uphold

Amend Schedule 2 - 8.(e)(iv)ii. by inserting the word “Safety” between the words “Aviation” and “Authority” and replace “Department for Planning and Infrastructure (Transport Division) with “Department of Transport”.

(iii) Noted

Shaun Breaden

Manager Development and Statutory Services

PO Box 507 Windich Street

ESPERANCE WA 6450

N/A

Ravensthorpe has provisions in their Scheme that could be useful to allow us to deal with unkempt land more effectively.

Uphold

Amend the Scheme by inserting into Schedule 1:

“30. Unkempt Land

(a) On any land within the Scheme area, any undergrowth, refuse, rubbish or disused material which in the opinion of the local government is likely to adversely affect the health, comfort or convenience of the inhabitants thereof, the local government may cause a notice to be served on the owner or occupier of such land requiring that the land is cleared of trees, scrub, undergrowth, refuse or rubbish, or such refuse, rubbish or disused material is removed from such land within a specified period.

(b) Where the owner or occupier does not clear the land or remove the refuse, rubbish or disused material as required by the notice, the local government may without payment or any compensation in respect thereof, clear or remove it and dispose of it at the expense of the owner or occupier to whom notice is given.

(c) A person to whom a notice under this clause is given may apply for a review of the requirement to the State Administrative Tribunal in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 Part 14. Where such an appeal is lodged, the effect of the notice and subsequent actions under subclause (b) shall be suspended until a decision of the State Administrative Tribunal has been handed down.

(d) Failure to comply with a notice under this clause shall be a breach of the provisions of this Scheme.”

Neil Hoey and Sharryn Robertson

PO Box 362

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 103 Lake Road and Lot 24 Hills Road, Myrup

(i) Requests to move the lot boundary between Lot 24 Hills Road and Lot 103 Lake Road.

(ii) Request 2 hectare Lot on corner of Hills Road and Cudgee Close.

(iii) No additional lots will be created.

(i) Noted

The Scheme currently provided for a boundary adjustment to be made between Lot 24 Hills Road and Lot 103 Lake Road.

(ii) Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning a 2 hectare portion of Lot 24 on corner of Hills Road and Cudgee Close to Rural Residential with the designation of RR3.

(iii) Noted

Horizon Power

143 Sims Street

CHADWICK WA 6450

Reserves 31359, 36365 and portion of Reserve 41248

(i) Horizon Power has commenced planning for future power generation capability on Lot 618 (Reserve 31359) (to supply power to the Town of Esperance). We seek to amend the zoning of the site to “Public purpose: Electricity purposes” to allow for the additional use of the site.

(ii) Request to extend request in (i) to amend the zoning of the site to “Public purpose: Electricity purposes” over Reserve 36365 and portion of Reserve 41248.

(i) Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Reserve 31359 to ‘Infrastructure Services’.

(ii) Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Reserve 36365 and portion of Reserve 41248 to ‘Infrastructure Services’.

Department of Water

5 Bevan Street

ALBANY WA 6330

N/A

Suggest the following draft clause for your consideration.

‘Despite any other provision of the Scheme, planning approval will only be issued if the proposal complies with Water Quality Protection Note 25 Land Use Compatibility Tables for Public Drinking Water Source Areas. Any approval that creates a variation from WQPN 25 will need to be supported by the Department of Water (in writing), before being issued’.

Uphold

Insert Schedule 2 - 4.(d)iii Stating “Despite any other provision of the Scheme planning approval cannot be issued unless the proposal complies with the provisions of Water Quality Protection Note 25 Land Use Compatibility in Public Drinking Water Source Areas unless it is satisfactory to the Department of Water.”

Shire of Ravensthorpe

PO Box 43

RAVENSTHORPE WA 6346

N/A

The Shire of Ravensthorpe has no objection and supports the draft Shire of Esperance Local Planning Scheme 24. There is little impact upon the Shire and its own planning and activities.

Noted

Esperance Tjaltjraak Services Pty Ltd

PO Box 1451

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 307 Norseman Road, Chadwick

(i) Lot 307 Norseman Road is currently zoned ‘Parks, Recreation and Conservation – Local’ under Local Planning Scheme No. 23. This area is of meaningful cultural significance to the Esperance Nyungar people. The water hole at this site was regularly used as a campground for Esperance Nyungar people, especially during the early days of Esperance’s development, when Aboriginal people were not allowed in the town site after dark.

Because of this cultural significance Lot 307 Norseman Road has been identified as a parcel of land to be transitioned to the Esperance Tjaltjraak Native Title Aboriginal Corporation as a 10 year lease.

(ii) Request the Shire of Esperance to amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Lot 307 Norseman Road to the Cultural and Resource Zone.

(i) Noted

(ii) Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Lot 307 Norseman Road, Chadwick to ‘Cultural and Natural Resource Zone’.

Sally Roworth

PO Box 1139

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 408 Yallambee Road, Myrup

Request that a ‘Shop’ be added as a land use to Lot 408 Yallambee Road, Myrup with an area of 36m².

Uphold

Amend Schedule 3 and the Scheme Map by adding an Additional Use with the following:

No. 12

Location: Lot 408 Yallambee Road, Myrup

Base Zone: Rural

Additional Use(s): As a ‘D’ use: Shop

Development Standards/Conditions: The shop is not to have a net Floor Area in excess of 36m².

Amend the Scheme Map accordingly.

David Law

35 Pink Lake Road

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 432 Freeman Street, Sinclair

Given the close proximity of our lot to the Esperance Senior High and the established residential area of Sinclair I would suggest a more appropriate zoning of our property would be Rural Residential.

I understand that you are presently undertaking a review of the present town planning scheme and would ask that you give consideration to this request in this review process.

Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Lot 432 Freeman Street, Lot 500 George Street, Lot 525 Thompson Street and Lots 97 and 300 Connolly Street, Sinclair as ‘Rural Residential’.

Helen Devenish

PO Box 1305

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 808 (21) Corry Street

Esperance

Request that a ‘Medical Centre’ be added as a land use to Lot 808 Corry Street, Esperance

Uphold

Amend Schedule 3 and the Scheme Map by adding an Additional Use with the following:

No. 13

Location: Lot 808 Corry Street, Esperance

Base Zone: Residential

Additional Use(s): As a ‘D’ use: Medical Centre

Development Standards/Conditions: The number of health practitioners is not to exceed 3.

State Heritage Office

PO Box 7479

CLOISTERS SQUARE PO WA 6850

N/A

(i) Scheme has been prepared in accordance with the deemed provisions as set out in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Schedule 2 wish is supported.

(ii) Local Planning Schemes enable local governments to create a heritage list. The Shire is yet to establish a heritage list, you may wish to consider a temporary solution of inserting a clause in the new scheme which states that the heritage list means the municipal inventory. While not the recommended approach, this is not considered inconsistent with the deemed provisions. Recommends the Shire begins planning to create a heritage list which meet these requirements as part of its review of its planning framework.

(i) Noted

(ii) Noted – a revised municipal inventory is currently being prepared which could form the basis of a heritage list.

Anne O’Neill

Yirri Grove

1544 Fisheries Road

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 1 Fisheries Road, Myrup

Request that a ‘Shop’ be added as a land use to Lot 1 Fisheries Road, Myrup with an area of 45m^2.

Uphold

Amend Schedule 3 and the Scheme Map by adding an Additional Use with the following:

No. 14

Location: Lot 1 Fisheries Road, Myrup

Base Zone: Rural

Additional Use(s): As a ‘D’ use: Shop

Development Standards/Conditions: The shop is not to have a net Floor Area in excess of 45m².

Esperance Tjaltjraak Services Pty Ltd

PO Box 1451

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lots 652 and 622 Sims Street, Chadwick,

Lot 303 Iona Street, Nulsen

(i) Lots 652 and 622 Sims Street have been offered to Esperance Tjaltjraak Services (ETS) as vested reserves for the purposes of Commercial, Residential, Cultural and Community Purposes. Road access to lots 622 and 652 is unlikely to occur in the foreseeable future, the use of these lots as part of contiguous industrial activity with properties located to the North, East or North West would appear to be the most appropriate outcome. The Department of Lands, as the owner of the two lots has no objection to their use for industrial purposes, and has also offered ETS power to lease upon these lots to facilitate their use for this purpose.

(ii) Lot 303 Iona Street has been offered to ETS in accordance with the Indigenous Land Use Agreement as a freehold property, free of encumbrances. It is recognised that the current cadastre of Lot 303 (and Lot 304) Iona Street was clearly influenced by the Shire of Esperance’s desire to excise portion of the previous single lot (now comprising Lots 303 and 304 Iona Street) for the purposes of a proposed new road reserve. It would therefore be appreciated if the matter concerning the proposed road reserve was clarified, and if as a result, portion of the previously proposed road reserve is no longer required from Lot 303, that the zoning for the whole of lot 303 is updated to Rural Residential.

(i) Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Lots 652 and 622 Sims Street, Chadwick to ‘General Industry’.

(ii) Noted

Lot 303 Iona Street, Nulsen is completely zoned for ‘Rural Residential’. Lot 304 has a reserve of ‘Public Open Space’ and ‘Local Distributor Road’. It is proposed to retain the zoning on Lot 304 as the portion of this lot reserved ‘Local Distributor Road’ is part of the future road network.

Department of Education

151 Royal Street

EAST PERTH WA 6004

N/A

No Objection

Noted

Water Corporation

PO Box 100

LEEDERVILLE WA 6902

N/A

The proposed changes appear to be largely of an administrative nature to comply with the model scheme text and do not appear to affect Water Corporation assets. If our assets are affected, the principle followed by the Water Corporation for the funding of subdivision or development is one of user pays. For any type of development the developer is expected to provide all water and sewerage reticulation that may be required. Incremental up-coding and density increases may require the developer to fund new works or the upgrading of existing works as development proceeds. In addition, the developer is responsible for the protection of all works.

Noted

Brett Trocinski

1 Kiwi Close

CASTLETOWN WA 6450

Lot 52 Kiwi Close and Lot 59 Goldfields Road, Castletown

Request that consideration be given to changing the zoning of Lot 52 Kiwi Close and Lot 59 Goldfields Road, Castletown to Residential R20 in line with the residential lots to the south west along Goldfields Road.

No current intentions to subdivide but it presents an opportunity to use the large frontages to Goldfields Road to encourage denser growth and flexibly in the future,

Dismiss

Lot 52 Kiwi Close and Lot 59 Goldfields Road, Castletown are proposed to be zoned ‘Rural Residential’ under the Scheme. The residential zoning that the current site entertains under Local Planning Scheme No. 23 was a result of the abolition of the Special Residential zone that was applied under former Town Planning Scheme No. 22.

If the proposal was supported a density bonus due to the lots size of R30 is applicable which would be incompatible with the surrounding development.

Alan and Alison Oliver-Miller

C/- Esperance Real Estate

PO Box 333

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 290 Mills Place, West Beach

Request that ‘Holiday House’ and ‘Holiday Accommodation’ are added to A11 (Lot 290 Mills Place, West Beach) as 'D' uses. The reason for this that we would like to supply some tourist accommodation in walking distance of West Beach.

Uphold

Amend Schedule 3 by adding the following uses to Additional Use A11 as a ‘D’ use:

· Holiday Accommodation

· Holiday House

Replace the Development Standards/Conditions: with ‘Holiday Accommodation is to comply with the density of R20.’

Department of Agriculture and Food

PO Box 483

NORTHAM WA 6401

N/A

(i) If there is any agricultural land of local, regional or state significance in the shire, this land should be identified and zoned as Priority Agriculture. A review of the Local Planning Strategy may also assist in identifying specific areas suitable for intensive agriculture.

(ii) In reference to a comment on page 35 (Schedule A), it should be noted that DAFWA's Stocking Rate Guidelines only apply to small rural holdings.

(iii) DAFWA supports the receipt of relevant Planning Applications where proposed development may impact rural land.

(iv) Any new mining development (e.g. extraction of basic raw materials) should be implemented with as little as possible disruption to Agriculture and in cooperation with all affected land holders.

(i) Noted

Priority Agriculture areas have not been identified within the local planning strategy at this stage but can be incorporated by Scheme Amendment once determined. It should also be noted that the ‘Priority Agriculture’ zone is not currently identified in Schedule 1 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

(ii) Noted

This has no impact on the operation of the Scheme as stocking rates do not apply to large rural holdings and they are also exempted by Clause 1(a)(i) of Schedule A.

(iii) Noted

(iv) Noted

Barry and Vera Wroth

PO Box 848

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 3 McLean Road, Chadwick

Two dwellings have been built on the lot. Not possible to subdivide which has created an untenable situation.

Dismiss

Whilst it is recognised that procedural errors in the past have not assisted the situation on Lot 3 McLean Road the Scheme is not the appropriate mechanism to resolve the issue. The draft Local Planning Strategy will provide an avenue to enable subdivision to occur.

David & Claire Mitchell

PO Box 1642

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 11 Coolgardie – Esperance Highway, Myrup

(i) Over recent years we have had enquiries over lot 11 as it is currently 80Ha, with a market value of approx. $500,000.00.

(ii) Most enquiries have wanted the location in smaller lots, to operate Home & business combined.

(iii) As a whole lot with home & shed costs it becomes an expensive option for small business.

(iv) We believe as 4 smaller lots we could then offer to the market an affordable option. Similar to what is zoned along old shark Lake Road. RS2 SCA 3B.

(i) Noted

(ii) Noted

(iii) Noted

(iv) Dismiss

Lot 11 Coolgardie-Esperance Highway is located within SCA3A. Within SCA3A there is a general presumption against the construction of single houses and other sensitive land uses. If supported it would be contrary to SCA3A.

Tourism Western Australia

GPO Box X2261

PERTH WA 6847

N/A

(i) In general, Tourism WA has no major comments to make on the draft Scheme text. The proposed changes are Iargely consistent with the model scheme text and therefore other local planning schemes.

(ii) In relation to the scheme maps, it is noted that the Shire does not differentiate its caravan parks from other tourism uses, and consistent with the existing scheme has proposed to retain these uses within the generic Tourism zone.

(i) Noted

(ii) Noted

The Scheme has been prepared in line with the Requirements of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and the approach undertaken has been deemed appropriate for the local Esperance context.

Lawrie Shaw

PO Box 2047

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 422 Pink Lake Road, Nulsen

Would like to apply for rezoning of Lot 422 Pink Lake Road from Commercial to Residential. I believe the change of zoning will make it easier to sell or redevelop the Block. I purchased the land in the early 90’s to accommodate my Business which was Pink Lake Butchers. I mainly used the Block for extra parking for Staff vehicles and loading refrigerated trucks. After 21 years I sold the Business in 2010 and have no longer use for a Commercial Block as there are a few commercial properties for Sale or Rent in the immediate area. I am sure I stand a better chance of selling it as a residential site

Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map by rezoning Lot 422 Pink Lake Road, Nulsen to ‘Residential’ with a density of R20.

Jenny Abbott on behalf of Marie Louise and David Wordsworth

8 The Esplanade,

PEPPERMINT GROVE WA 6011.

Lot 1 Dempster Street, Esperance

Request that a R40 density coding be applied to Lot 1 Dempster Street.

Dismiss

Lot 1 Dempster Street is a Permanent Entry on the Heritage Council of Western Australia Register of Heritage Places (Site 822).

An extract from the register entry states ‘Dempster Homestead (fmr), Esperance, a single storey, stone and iron residence in the Victorian Regency style set in landscaped gardens’.

Any proposal to apply a density to all or part of this site would need detailed heritage assessment. The site is also impacted by SCA 1 and SCA 9.

Kim & Gillian Beale

RMB 4323

Merivale Road

ESPERANCE WA 6420

Lot 35 Merivale Road, Myrup

Would like to see a shop included with the ‘Stonehenge’ development.

Stock will included souvenirs, tea and coffee, ice creams and cool drinks, handcrafts and other craft product, and tourism related information.

The floor area of the shop will not exceed 150m².

Uphold

Amend Schedule 3 and the Scheme Map by adding an Additional Use with the following:

No. 15

Location: Lot 1 Fisheries Road, Myrup

Base Zone: Rural

Additional Use(s): As a ‘D’ use: Shop

Development Standards/Conditions:

1. Should Lot 35 Merivale Road be subdivided this additional use will only apply to the lot containing the ‘Stonehenge’; attraction.

2. The shop is not to have a net Floor Area in excess of 150m².

Eleven Mile Beach Estate PTY LTD

PO Box 229

ESPERANCE WA 6450

Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road, Pink Lake

One of the aspects built into our Structure Plan was to identify that the area is thriving and the population is growing rapidly and therefore there is scope for a commercial enterprise such as a small convenience shop/coffee shop.

On our Structure Plan we have identified a block on the corner of Eleven Mile Beach Rd and Keenan Rd which would be ideal for this type of enterprise and request that the zoning required to enable this be included in LPS 24.

Uphold

Amend Schedule 3 and the Scheme Map by adding an Additional Use with the following:

No. 16

Location: Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road, Pink Lake

Base Zone: Rural Residential

Additional Use(s): As a ‘D’ use: Shop

Development Standards/Conditions:

1. Should Lot 9002 Eleven Mile Beach Road be subdivided this additional use will only apply to the lot on the corner of Eleven Mile Beach Road and Keenan Road.

2. The shop is not to have a net Floor Area in excess of 150m².

Department of Water

5 Bevan Street

ALBANY WA 6330

N/A

(i) SCA 4 – Shire is commended on provisions that will allow compliance with the Department of Water’s Water Quality Protection Note (WQPN) No. 25- Land use compatibility tables for public drinking water source areas (PDWSAs) (LUCT) (April 2016).

(ii) Recreation on land in a Public Drinking Water Source Area – Skroyls Park is located within the Priority 2 area. While the DoW's policy recognises existing facilities as well as maintenance and improvements to these (within current capacity), the policy recommends that new facilities are located outside PDWSAs. DoW notes the absence of a proposed scheme provision and questions the Shire's reasons for not including it within Draft LPS No.24 in SCA 4.

(iii) Condingup Water Reserve - The draft Condingup Water Reserve drinking water source protection review is being finalised. The boundary for the PDWSA in draft LPS No.24 should reflect current Drinking Water Source Protection report until an amended boundary is approved. Shape files for the proposed boundary of the Condingup Water Reserve will be made available to the Shire once the report is approved. The DoW will advise the Shire when this occurs.

(iv) Zoning table- The draft LPS No.24 zoning table should be consistent with the DoW's WQPN No.25 LUCT to ensure decision making for land use and development within SCA 4- PDWSA is consistent with the guideline.

(v) Better urban water management - The DoW recommends the integration of the Better Urban Water Management framework into the Shire's planning process. The following paragraph should be included in Part 4- General development requirements of the scheme text. "Management of stormwater on all developments should be in accordance with current best practice as per the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Australia (DoW, 2007). The Local Government may require the preparation of water management plans as a condition of development approval as per the Better Urban Water Management framework".

(vi) Supports exemption of minor buildings from requiring planning approval in SCA 4.

(vii) A7 – various lots Condingup - These lots are located within the P3 area of the Condingup Water reserve. The proposed additional uses are all acceptable in a P3 area, however the DoW requests that when these planning proposals are received, they are referred to DoW for advice.

(viii) A8 – Lot 5 Downes Street, Pink Lake - This site is located in a P2 area of the Esperance Water Reserve and within a wellhead protection zone. Reception centres are incompatible in P2 areas. If this is an existing facility, the DoW would welcome the opportunity to understand what facilities are located on the site, and whether there are opportunities to reduce risk to the water resource.

(ix) New Lot sizes for rural townsite zone – DoW supports as it is consistent with SCA 4.

(x) RR2 - The DoW queries whether it is possible to modify the provisions relating to the keeping of horses to include other stock? The DoW has previously raised this issue with the Shire as all stock create a risk to the water resource, not just horses.

Suggested wording;

3. The keeping of stock on lots less than 4 ha in area is prohibited.

4. The number of stock permitted on lots of 4 ha must be in accordance with DAFWA stocking guidelines. The local government will only grant approval to the keeping of stock subject to submission of an application for planning approval that includes proposed measures to manage the land.

(xi) RR6 – Condingup- Request the inclusion of additional provisions to

acknowledge the location of this RR area within the Condingup Water Reserve e.g.

1. All development shall be consistent with the provisions of SCA 4.

2. Rural pursuits that have the potential to pollute the Condingup Water Reserve Public Drinking Water Source Area are to be refused or referred to the Water Corporation and the Department of Water for comment and the local government is to be due regard to advice received from those agencies when determining applications.

3. Fertilisers, herbicides and insecticides should be applied sparingly to prevent excess chemicals or nutrients leaching into the groundwater with particular reference to protecting the Condingup Water Reserve.

(xii) Lots 44-48 Connolly Street & Lots 49, 54 & 55 Thompson St West Beach - These lots are located within a P2 area of the Esperance Water Reserve where the minimum lot size supported by the DoW is 2ha. The proposed density of R2 will be an improvement from the current R5, however the DoW will not support any subdivision of these lots without connection to sewer, particularly as they are located within wellhead protection zones for multiple production bores. Both the current and proposed zoning is inconsistent with the SCA 4 provisions.

(xiii) Lot 70 Stewart Street & Lot 76, 77, 79, 81 and 82 Twilight Beach Road, West Beach – These lots are located in a P3 area of the Esperance Water Reserve where the minimum lot size supported by the DoW is 1 ha, unless the site is connected to sewer. All future development for these lots should be consistent with the SCA 4 provisions.

(xiv) R14348 Gibson - change from agriculture to public purpose - This site is located in a P2 area of the Gibson Water Reserve. It appears that the change in zoning is to support the development of a gravel pit? When the development proposal is received, it should be forwarded to the DoW for advice to minimise the risk to the groundwater source.

(i) Noted

(ii) Noted

Provisions dealing specifically with Skroyls Park are located within the Local Planning Strategy and not the Scheme.

(iii) Uphold

Amend Schedule 2 – SCA 4 by inserting the following:

(h) Modification of Boundary

Upon finalisation of any Public Drinking Source Area within the Scheme Area by the Department of Water, any realignment of the SCA 4 boundary will trigger a Basic Amendment.

(iv) Noted

SCA4 ensures, irrespective of the zoning table, the DoW’s WQPN No.25 LUCT.

(v) Uphold

Amend the Schedule 1 by inserting the following:

“31. Management of stormwater

Management of stormwater on all developments should be in accordance with current best practice as per the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Australia (DoW, 2007). The Local Government may require the preparation of water management plans as a condition of development approval as per the Better Urban Water Management framework.”

(vi) Noted

(vii) Uphold

See Submission 30 (xi).

(viii) Uphold

Amend the Development Standards/Conditions for A8 in Schedule 3 by replacing it with:

1. Planning approval cannot be issued unless the proposal complies with the provisions of Water Quality Protection Note 25 Land Use Compatibility in Public Drinking Water Source Areas unless it is satisfactory to the Department of Water

(ix) Noted

(x) Uphold

Amend Schedule 8 - RR2 by replacing the word ‘horses’ with ‘stock’ in subclause 3. and 4.

(xi) Uphold in Part

Submission 9 addresses SCA 4 and as RR6 is with SCA4 this has already been addressed.

Amend Schedule 8 - RR6 by inserting the following:

(xii) Uphold

Amend the Scheme Map to show Lots 44-48 Connolly Street & Lots 49, 54 & 55 Thompson St West Beach as ‘Rural Residential’.

(xiii) Noted

(xiv) Noted

The reservation has been applied as the land in question is a crown reserve. As it is located within SCA 4 and development proposal will be referred to the Department of Water.

Department of Mines and Petroleum

100 Plain Street EAST PERTH WA 6004

N/A

(i) Advised that State Planning Policy 2.5 Rural Planning has been recently released and that Department of Mines and Petroleum had input in regard to mining in Western Australia.

(ii) Concerned over the change of the large areas of unallocated crown land from ‘Rural Unsettled’ under LPS 23 to ‘Environmental Conservation’ under LPS 24. The proposed change to a reserve classification of ‘Environmental Conservation’ gives the impression that mining activities are not supported for these areas. Excluding those areas that are already designated as State conservation reserves (under the Land Administration Act 1997), DMP requests that no reservation is applied to the balance of the ‘unsettled’ rangelands. DMP suggests that these areas could continue to be zoned ‘Rural’, thereby facilitating a wide variety of purposes, including environmental assets as set out in SPP 2.5. If the designation of ‘Rural’ is not deemed acceptable, then DMP requests that in the first instance these areas have no category (zone or reserve) if indeed no suitable alternative is currently available.

(iii) A map has been provided showing the location of five proposed Significant Geological Supplies (SGS) areas under State Planning Policy 2.5. These areas have basic raw materials that are of State significance due to the size of the resource, relative scarcity, demand and /or location near growth or demand areas. Notably, these areas have long-term strategic resources important to the development of the Shire, such as the limesand for agricultural purposes. It is recommended that the Shire considers applying Special Control areas around any of these areas if they are potentially threatened by conflicting land uses

(i) Noted

(ii) Noted

Whilst the concerns raised are noted it should be noted that the ‘Environmental Conservation’ reserve was applied as the previous ‘Rural Unsettled’ zone was not available under the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015. It should also be noted that this is only a Scheme Reserve and does not prevent activities that can occur under the Mining Act 1978.

(iii) Noted

The areas identified are proposed to be shown on the Local Planning Strategy maps which will provide suitable guidance in relation to any intensification of use through either subdivision or Scheme Amendment.

Department of Health

PO Box 8172

Perth Business Centre WA 6849

N/A

(i) Although the proposed Scheme encourages 'positive' outcomes for the Shire, it does not address potential negative issues in relation to such outcomes/developments. The Shire of Esperance could consider a provision within the scheme to require a 'health risk assessment' for a proposal. The 'health risk assessment' should include the benefits and negatives of the proposal and include public health, social and environmental impacts.

(ii) Schedule 1 Item 2 - Minimum lot size in residential zones

• Should specify in (a) -'where sewer connection is available....'

• For non-sewered lots - a different minimum lot size 'consistent with on-site effluent disposal requirements' is more appropriate.

(iii) The Scheme should require that any proposed developments are required to connect to scheme water and reticulated sewerage in accordance with the draft Country Sewerage Policy (as appropriate).Any water management plan including the utilisation of recreational water and any waste water recycling is to comply with DOH guidelines and requirements.

(iv) The Scheme should also advise that approval is required for any on-site waste water treatment process.

(v) The Scheme should require that a sufficient supply of potable water is of the quality specified under the Australian Drinking Water Quality Guidelines 2004.

(vi) DOH has a document on 'Evidence supporting the creation of environments that encourage healthy active living' which may assist you with planning elements related to this Scheme.

(vii) The proposed Scheme is to acknowledge and incorporate appropriate separation distances in accordance with the EPA Environmental Assessment Guideline (EAG) 3 'Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors No. 3 -Separation Distances between Industrial and Sensitive Land Uses'.

(viii) The Scheme should also acknowledge the DOH's Guidelines for the Separation of Agricultural and Residential Land Use as a means to help avoid conflict and potential adverse health effects and nuisance impacts from chemical use, dust and other rural pursuits.

(ix) Another document 'Land Use Planning for Natural Hazards can also guide the use of land to effectively reduce risk and enhance sustainability for areas prone to hazards such as flooding (including storm surge), fire, landslide, earthquake, strong wind and coastal erosion.

(i) Noted

The Scheme, through the Clause 67 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, requires due regard to be given to the listed matters, to the extent that is required in the opinion of the local government. The proposed modification is not supported

(ii) Uphold

Amend Schedule 1 Clause 2.(a) by adding ‘ where a sewerage connection is available’ after Detailed Area Plan.

Amend Schedule 1 Clause 2.(b) by renumbering it to Schedule 1 Clause 2.(c).

Amend Schedule 1 Clause 2 by inserting a new clause 2.(b) stating ‘For non-sewered lots a minimum lot size not greater that outlined in subclause (a) is to be consistent with on-site effluent disposal requirement.’

(iii) Noted

The Draft Government Sewerage Policy will apply without being incorporated into the Scheme. The Scheme also already contains provision in relation to the on-site collection of potable water.

(iv) Noted

Waste water treatment is not dealt with under the regulatory framework of the Scheme

(v) Uphold

Amend Schedule 1 Clause 17 by inserting as separate sentence at the end of the clause “Potable water is of the quality specified under the Australian Drinking Water Quality Guidelines 2004 (as amended).”

(vi) Noted

Advice only

(vii) Noted

The Scheme incorporates zoning controls to enforce adequate separation distances and to avoid incompatible land uses.

(viii) Noted

Refer Submission 32.(viii)

(ix) Noted

Advice only – it should also be noted that the Scheme and State Policy that is applied through the Scheme and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulation provide an effective to plan for natural hazards.

Table 2.1: Assets covered by this Plan

Category	Quantity	Replacement Value	Depreciated Replacement Value	Annual Depreciation Value
Plant	96	$13,394,572	$8,643,385	$1,533,726
Vehicles	66	$3,000,804	$2,273,577	$436,487
Total		$16,395,376	$10,916,962	$1,970,213

2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Management

The Council exists to provide services to its community. Council’s goal in managing infrastructure assets is to meet the required level of service in the most cost effective manner for present and future consumers.

The Shire of Esperance owns and operates a fleet of plant and equipment to assist in providing these services. Management of the fleet is therefore critical in ensuring community, strategic and operational service levels are achieved now and in the future.

2.3 Plan Framework

The key elements of Fleet asset management are:

· Taking a life cycle approach,

· Developing cost-effective management strategies for the long term

· Providing a defined level of service and monitoring performance

· Understanding and meeting the demands of growth

· Managing risks

· Continuous improvement in asset management practices.

2.4 Core and Advanced Asset Management

This asset management plan supersedes 2014 Fleet AMP and is intended to meet minimum legislative and organisational requirements for sustainable service delivery and long term financial planning and reporting.

2.5 Community Consultation

Community consultation is used to assist Council and the community in matching the level of service needed by the community, service risks and consequences with the community’s ability to pay for the service.

3. LEVELS OF SERVICE

3.1 Customer Research and Expectations

Council has not carried out any research on customer expectations. The Plant and Vehicle AMP is prepared based on the Shire’s current operational and service delivery requirements.

3.2 Legislative Requirements

Legislative requirements relating to Plant and Vehicle assets include:

· Local Government Act

· Environmental Protection Act

· Road Traffic Act

· Motor Vehicle Standards Act

· OSH Act

· OSH Regulations

3.3 Current Levels of Service

Service levels are defined using Community and Technical measures but have not been identified in this plan.

3.4 Desired Levels of Service

Desired service level measures and targets will be addressed in future reviews of this plan.

4. FUTURE DEMAND

4.1 Demand Forecast

Factors affecting demand may include changes in technology, population, demographics, seasonal factors, consumer preferences, expectations, economic and environmental factors. Demand may also be affected by seasonal use of the Shire’s road network and by factors including availability of resources such as gravel. This in turn may affect haul distances, types of plant required, plant renewal frequency and budgets. The Shires ability to meet any future desired level of service from Fleet infrastructure will be managed through successive reviews of the asset management plan.

Demand factor trends and impacts on service delivery are summarised in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1: Demand Factors, Projections and Impact on Services

Demand factor	Present position	Projection
Technology	Safety and productivity improvements are incorporated where possible in purchasing decisions.	Technical advances in safety, productivity and cost effectiveness will be monitored and incorporated where appropriate. GPS Fleet Tracking will be implemented in 2017 as per Policy “Ass 024”.
Capacity	The current 10 Year Plant and Vehicle renewal plans incorporate foreseeable changes in demand.	Future changes in demand may be identified from changes in road conditions, levels of service, material availability, climate or other factors. The capacity of the existing and proposed fleet to meet the desired levels of service will be monitored and any impacts will be reflected in annual reviews of this plan.

5. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The lifecycle management plan details how Council plans to meet existing levels of service while optimising life cycle costs.

5.1 Background Data

5.1.1 Physical parameters

The assets covered by this asset management plan are shown in Table 2.1.

Plant and Vehicle assets replacements are optimised based on a combination values including residual value, age, performance, condition, servicing and maintenance costs.

5.1.2 Asset capacity and performance

Council’s services are generally provided to meet design standards where these are available. Known service performance deficiencies are detailed in Table 5.1.2.

Table 5.1.2: Known Service Performance Deficiencies

Area	Service Deficiency
Fleet management system	Review current systems to ensure adequate integrated planning and reporting capabilities
Vehicles	Further standardisation of vehicle classes to be addressed.
Plant	Further address efficiency opportunities eg. Side tipping trailers On-going review of asset utilisation
Workshop	On-going review of workshop facilities to meet safety and servicing requirements of current fleet.

5.1.3 Asset condition

Plant and Vehicle condition is monitored continually by operators and maintenance and servicing staff. It is assumed that all maintenance and repairs are conducted as required without the need for asset condition monitoring.

5.1.4 Asset valuations

Assets values are shown below.

Current Replacement Cost (CRC) $16,395,376 (Current replacement cost of assets)

Depreciable Amount $12,426,251 (Current replacement cost – Residual)

Depreciated Replacement Cost (DRC) $10,916,962 (CRC – accumulated depreciation)

Annual Depreciation Expense (ADC) $1,970,213 (CRC – Residual / Useful Life)

Department of Local Government KPI’s:

	Asset Consumption Ratio	Asset Sustainability Ratio	Asset Renewal Funding Ratio
Vehicles	76%	96%	100%
Plant	65%	82%	100%
Combined	67%	85%	100%

The following table outlines the method, targets and interpretation

	Asset Consumption Ratio	Asset Sustainability Ratio	Asset Renewal Funding Ratio
Method	Depreciated Replacement value / Current Replacement value	Renewal Expenditure / Depreciation expenditure	10yr NPV Planned exp / 10yr NPV Required exp
Target	50 – 75%	90 – 100%	95 – 105%
Interpretation	Indicates the aged condition of assets, a ratio of less than 50% may indicate rapid deterioration, 60% indicates an adequate usable level of service, greater than 75% may indicate over investment	A Ratio below 90% would normally indicate under investment in renewal. This figure indicates an adequate level of renewal is provided	This ratio would normally indicate adequate provision for renewal in the LTFP, the ratio in this case is based on the assumption that all expenditure is funded

By fully funding projected renewals, Council is ensuring assets are renewed at the rate they are being consumed over the medium-long term and funding the life cycle costs for all new assets and services in its long term financial plan.

5.1.5 Asset hierarchy

Service Hierarchy

Service Level Objective

Plant

Provide and maintain fleet assets which enable major operational and construction tasks to be completed. Assets comply with all relevant standards and specifications.

Vehicles

Provide and maintain passenger and light operational vehicles to manufacturer’s specifications so as to ensure the safety of staff and public. Ensure the maximum utilisation and lowest whole of life costs while minimising environmental impacts. Assets comply with all relevant standards and specifications.

Sundry

Provide and maintain minor fleet assets to enable operational tasks to be completed in a safe manner. Assets comply with all relevant standards and specifications.

5.2 Risk Management Plan

No critical risks, being those assessed as ‘Very High’ - requiring immediate corrective action and ‘High’ – requiring prioritised corrective action have been identified in the Infrastructure Risk Management Plan.

5.3 Routine Operations and Maintenance Plan

Operations include regular activities to provide services relating to health, safety and amenity.

Routine maintenance is the regular on-going work that is necessary to keep assets operating, including instances where portions of the asset fail and need immediate repair to make the asset operational again.

5.3.1 Operations and Maintenance plan

Operations activities affect service level including quality and function and include purchase of fuel and GPS vehicle tracking.

Maintenance includes scheduled and un-scheduled work activities.

Scheduled maintenance is regular servicing and repair work that is managed through the Fleet Management System.

Un-scheduled maintenance is repair work carried out in response to service requests and management/supervisory directions.

Maintenance activities include inspection, assessing the condition and failures/breakdowns, prioritising, scheduling, actioning the work and reporting what was done to develop a maintenance history and improve maintenance and service delivery performance.

5.3.2 Standards and specifications

Maintenance work is carried out in accordance with Standards and Specifications and utilise scheduled maintenance plans and checklists.

· Motor Vehicles Standards Act

· Australian Design Rules

· Australian Dangerous Goods Code

· Road Traffic Act

· Road Traffic Regulations

· Road Traffic Rules

· Manufacturers vehicle specifications

5.3.3 Summary of future operations and maintenance expenditures

Future operations and maintenance expenditure is forecast to trend in line with the value of the asset stock as shown in

Figure 4: Projected Operations and Maintenance Expenditure

5.4 Renewal/Replacement Plan

Plant and Vehicle renewal expenditure may include the major refurbishment or the complete replacement of an existing asset in any category. Purchase or provision of fleet assets other than existing is considered new expenditure.

5.4.1 Renewal plan

Assets requiring renewal have been identified in the 10 Year Renewal Plans and incorporated in the NAMS.Plus3 Asset Data Management expenditure templates using Method 2 below.

· Method 1 uses Asset Register data to project the renewal costs for renewal years using acquisition year and useful life

· Method 2 uses capital renewal expenditure projections from external condition modelling systems (such as Pavement Management Systems)

· Method 3 uses a combination of average network renewals plus defect repairs in the Renewal Plan and Defect Repair Plan worksheets on the ‘Expenditure template’.

5.4.2 Renewal standards

Renewal work is carried out as per 5.3.2 Standards and Specifications.

5.4.3 Summary of projected renewal expenditure

Projected future renewal expenditures are forecast to increase over time as the asset stock ages. The costs are summarised in Figure 5.

The projected capital renewal program is shown in Appendix A.

Figure 5: Projected Capital Renewal Expenditure

5.5 Creation/Acquisition/Upgrade Plan

Refer to the Shire’s “10 Year Plant and Vehicle Renewal Plans”.

5.5.1 Selection criteria

The priority for all proposals is based on the desired service delivery, operational requirements and approved budget.

5.5.2 Standards and specifications

Standards and specifications for new assets and for upgrade/expansion of existing assets are the same as those for renewal shown in Section 5.4.2.

5.5.3 Summary of projected upgrade/new assets expenditure

Projected upgrades or new assets are detailed in the 10 year Plant & Vehicle Replacement plans.

Figure 6: Projected Capital Upgrade / New Asset Expenditure

5.6 Disposal Plan

Disposals are detailed in the 10 year Plant & Vehicle Replacement plans.

6. FINANCIAL SUMMARY

This section contains the financial requirements resulting from all the information presented in the previous sections of this asset management plan. The financial projections will be improved as further information becomes available on desired levels of service and current and projected future asset performance.

6.1 Financial Statements and Projections

The financial projections are shown in Figure 7 for projected operating (operations and maintenance) and capital expenditure (renewal and upgrade/expansion/new assets), net disposal expenditure and estimated budget funding.

Figure 7: Projected Operating and Capital Expenditure and Budget

6.1.1 Financial sustainability in service delivery

The key indicator for financial sustainability considered in the analysis of the services provided by this asset category is the projected/budgeted expenditure over a 10 year planning period.

Medium term – 10 year financial planning period

Lifecycle costs $4,198,465 / yr (over the 10 year planning period)

Lifecycle expenditure $4,198,465 / yr (over the 10 year planning period)

Funding shortfall $0 / yr (difference between costs and expenditure)

Indicates that Council has 100% of the projected expenditure required to provide the documented services

Financial Sustainability Indicators

Providing services from infrastructure in a sustainable manner requires the matching and managing of service levels, risks, projected expenditures and funding to achieve financial sustainability over the 10 year life of the AM Plan.

Figure 7A: Financial Sustainability Indicators

Figure 8 shows the projected asset renewals in the 10 year planning period from Appendix A. The projected asset renewals are compared to budgeted renewal expenditure in the capital works program and capital renewal expenditure in year 1 of the planning period in Figure 8.

Figure 8: Projected and Budgeted Renewal Expenditure

Table 6.1.1: Projected and Budgeted Renewals and Expenditure Shortfall

Year	Projected Renewals	LTFP Renewal Budget	Renewal Funding Shortfall	Cumulative Shortfall
2017	$1,671,000	$1,671,000	$-	$-
2018	$1,554,000	$1,554,000	$-	$-
2019	$1,891,000	$1,891,000	$-	$-
2020	$1,766,000	$1,766,000	$-	$-
2021	$2,812,000	$2,812,000	$-	$-
2022	$1,953,000	$1,953,000	$-	$-
2023	$2,399,000	$2,399,000	$-	$-
2024	$2,184,000	$2,184,000	$-	$-
2025	$2,350,000	$2,350,000	$-	$-
2026	$2,290,000	$2,290,000	$-	$-

Note: A negative shortfall indicates a funding gap, a positive shortfall indicates a surplus for that year.

6.1.2 Expenditure projections for long term financial plan

Expenditure projections are in current (non-inflated) values. Disposals are shown as net expenditures (revenues are negative).

Table 6.1.2: Expenditure Projections for Long Term Financial Plan ($’000)

Year	Operations	Maintenance	Projected Capital Renewal	Capital Upgrade/ New	Disposals
2017	$1,256,000	$806,000	$1,671,000	$235,000	$-
2018	$1,273,570	$817,280	$1,554,000	$-	$-
2019	$1,273,570	$817,280	$1,891,000	$-	$-
2020	$1,273,570	$817,280	$1,766,000	$-	$-
2021	$1,273,570	$817,280	$2,812,000	$-	$-
2022	$1,273,570	$817,280	$1,953,000	$-	$-
2023	$1,273,570	$817,280	$2,399,000	$-	$-
2024	$1,273,570	$817,280	$2,184,000	$-	$-
2025	$1,273,570	$817,280	$2,350,000	$-	$-
2026	$1,273,570	$817,280	$2,290,000	$-	$-

Note: All Operations and Maintenance projected expenditures are in current values

6.2 Funding Strategy

Projected expenditure identified in Section 6.1 is to be funded from future operating and capital budgets. The funding strategy will be detailed in the organisation’s 10 year long term financial plan.

6.3 Valuation Forecasts

Asset values are forecast to increase as additional assets are added to the asset stock from acquisition by Council. Figure 9 shows the projected replacement cost asset values over the planning period.

Figure 9: Projected Asset Values

Depreciation expense values are forecast in line with asset values as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10: Projected Depreciation Expense.

The depreciated replacement cost (current replacement cost less accumulated depreciation) will vary over the forecast period depending on the rates of addition of new assets, disposal of old assets and consumption and renewal of existing assets. Forecast of the assets’ depreciated replacement cost is shown in Figure 11. The effect of contributed and new assets on the depreciated replacement cost is shown in the darker colour.

Figure 11: Projected Depreciated Replacement Cost

7. ASSET MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

7.1 Accounting/Financial Systems

Refer to the General Asset Management Plan for further details regarding accounting and financial systems.

7.2 Asset Management Systems

Refer to the General Asset Management Plan for further details regarding Asset Management Systems.

7.3 Information Flow Requirements and Processes

Refer to the General Asset Management Plan for further details regarding information flows and processes.

7.4 Standards and Guidelines

Refer to the General Asset Management Plan for further details regarding standards and guidelines.

8. PLAN IMPROVEMENT AND MONITORING

8.1 Performance Measures

Refer to the General Asset Management Plan for further details regarding performance measures.

8.2 Improvement Plan

The asset management improvement plan generated from this asset management plan is shown in Table 8.2.

Table 8.2: Improvement Plan

Task	Task	Responsibility	Timeline
1	Monitor procedures to ensure the Asset Register is maintained and accurate	Asset Planning	On-going
2	Review risk register and implement any treatment plans.	Asset Planning / OSH	Annually
3	Ensure adequate workshop resources are available to support the fleet maintenance schedule	Asset Planning	On-going
4	Ensure the Fleet Management System continues to support best fleet management practices	Asset Planning	2016/17
5	Review the integration of the asset register and financial systems for long term planning	Asset Planning	Annually

8.3 Monitoring and Review Procedures

This asset management plan will be reviewed during annual budget preparation and amended to recognise any material changes in service levels and/or resources available to provide those services as a result of the budget decision process.

A full review of this Asset Management Plan is expected within 5 years.

REFERENCES

· 10 Year Plant Renewal Plan

· 10 Year Vehicle Renewal Plan

· NAMS.Plus Data Management and reporting system

· Authority BIS Financial Reporting

· TRIM Record management System

· SoE General Asset Management Plan

Appendix A Plant and Vehicle Valuation

Category	Group	Current Replacement Cost	Depreciated Replacement Cost	Annual Depreciation Cost	Residual
Vehicles	General	$2,265,056	$1,691,589	$343,313	$815,861
	Waste	$37,000	$17,000	$5,000	$12,000
	Airport	$37,000	$37,000	$6,498	$12,000
	Homecare	$661,748	$527,988	$81,676	$157,219
	S/T	$3,000,804	$2,273,577	$436,487	$997,080

Plant	General	$12,137,970	$7,768,881	$1,366,327	$2,795,323
	Waste	$1,185,132	$831,820	$157,804	$162,394
	Airport	$71,470	$42,684	$9,595	$14,328
	S/T	$13,394,572	$8,643,385	$1,533,726	$2,972,045

	Total	$16,395,376	$10,916,962	$1,970,213	$3,969,125

Item: 12.2.1

Attachment a.: Plant & Vehicle Asset Management Plan 2016

Appendix B Projected Capital Expenditure Summary

			2017/2018			2018/2019			2019/2020			2020/2021			2021/2022
			Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net
Vehicles	General	Renewal	$536,000	$193,335	$342,665	$534,570	$210,932	$323,638	$654,814	$263,789	$391,025	$479,707	$184,233	$295,474	$738,143	$215,883	$522,260
	Waste	Renewal				$38,110	$12,360	$25,750
	Airport	Renewal	$37,000	$12,000	$25,000										$41,644	$13,506	$28,138
	Homecare	Renewal	$55,000	$21,218	$33,782				$67,898	$16,974	$50,923	$118,015	$35,987	$82,027	$99,045	$32,322	$66,722
		Total	$628,000	$226,553	$401,447	$572,680	$223,292	$349,388	$722,712	$280,763	$441,948	$597,722	$220,220	$377,501	$878,832	$261,711	$617,120

Plant	General	Renewal	$1,696,480	$425,661	$1,035,818	$1,563,540	$358,830	$1,204,710	$1,770,377	$475,275	$1,345,220	$1,846,530	$489,465	$1,388,708	$1,919,587	$504,838	$1,414,750
	General	Upgrade			$235,000			$0			$0			$0			$0
	Waste	Renewal	$327,818	$94,111	$233,707	$0	$0	$0	$142,085	$38,028	$104,057	$0	$0	$0	$814,176	$33,295	$780,881
	Airport	Renewal	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
		Total	$2,024,298	$519,773	$1,504,525	$1,563,540	$358,830	$1,204,710	$1,912,462	$513,303	$1,449,276	$1,846,530	$489,465	$1,388,708	$2,733,764	$538,133	$2,195,631

Sundry	General	Renewal	$168,605	$5,583	$163,022	$173,663	$5,666	$167,997	$178,873	$5,751	$173,122	$184,239	$5,837	$178,402	$189,766	$5,925	$183,841

			2022/2023			2023/2024			2024/2025			2025/2026			2026/2027
			Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net	Budget Expenditure	Budget Income	Budget Net
Vehicles	General	Renewal	$615,575	$257,093	$358,482	$527,771	$204,865	$322,907	$770,178	$307,850	$462,328	$547,245	$171,647	$375,597	$782,864	$316,769	$466,095
	Waste	Renewal				$44,180	$14,329	$29,851
	Airport	Renewal										$46,870	$15,201	$31,669
	Homecare	Renewal	$63,760	$24,597	$39,163	$424,781	$63,442	$361,339				$206,484	$68,597	$95,092	$114,820	$37,470	$77,350
		Total	$679,335	$281,690	$397,645	$996,732	$282,636	$714,097	$770,178	$307,850	$462,328	$800,599	$255,445	$502,358	$897,684	$354,239	$543,445

Plant	General	Renewal	$2,026,981	$537,978	$1,489,003	$2,093,277	$695,400	$1,397,877	$2,121,452	$458,253	$1,721,325	$2,407,435	$596,367	$1,847,856	$2,272,617	$525,448	$1,747,169
	General	Upgrade			$0			$0			$0			$0			$0
	Waste	Renewal	$0	$0	$0	$391,432	$102,905	$288,527	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
	Airport	Renewal	$82,853	$15,436	$67,417	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
		Total	$2,109,835	$553,414	$1,556,420	$2,484,708	$798,305	$1,686,404	$2,121,452	$458,253	$1,721,325	$2,407,435	$596,367	$1,847,856	$2,272,617	$525,448	$1,747,169

Sundry	General	Renewal	$195,459	$6,014	$189,445	$201,323	$6,104	$195,219	$207,363	$6,196	$201,167	$213,584	$6,289	$207,295	$219,991	$6,477	$213,514

Document Control
Rev No	Date	Revision Details	Author	Reviewer	Approver
01	18/11/2016	Draft	BP	MW
02	07/12/2016	Update Vehicle cost and trade values	BP